Survey instruments examining the perspective of HIV infected people were coded for items measuring enacted stigma, anticipated stigma, and internalized stigma. Items were coded as enacted stigma if they measured perceived experiences of prejudice and/or discrimination. These items spanned a wide range of experiences, including discriminatory actions (e.g., “At the hospital/clinic, I was left in a soiled bed” [11 (link)]), verbal abuse (e.g., “Someone told me HIV is what I deserve for how I lived” [9 (link)]), and social rejection (e.g., “I feel some friends have rejected me because of my illness” [8 (link)]). Items were coded as anticipated stigma if they measured the expectation of experiencing future prejudice and discrimination. Some of these items referenced discriminatory behaviors (e.g., “Most employers would not employ me because I am HIV+” [50 (link)]) while others measured the anticipation of dislike by others (e.g. “My neighbors would not like living next door if they knew I had HIV” [50 (link)]). Finally, measures were coded as assessing internalized stigma if they measured the application of shame and/or negative beliefs associated with HIV/AIDS to the self. Items assessing shame (e.g., “I feel ashamed that I have HIV” [50 (link)]), guilt, (e.g., “I feel guilty because I have HIV” [9 (link)]), and worthlessness (e.g., “I felt completely worthless” [11 (link)]) were common examples.
Sex Workers
This term encompasses a diverse range of individuals, including cisgender and transgender individuals, male, female, and non-binary persons.
Sex work may take many forms, such as street-based, escort, or online-based services.
Sex workers face unique challenges, including stigma, discrimination, and increased risk of violence and exploitation.
Research focused on supporting sex worker communities is crucial to improving health outcomes and protecting human rights.
PubCompare.ai offers a powerful tool to assist researchers in locating the most effective protocols and methods to aid sex worker populations.
Most cited protocols related to «Sex Workers»
In 2004, researchers were approached to collaborate on an initial needs assessment of women attending the drop-in. The results led to the conception and design of both a research and a service arm [29 (link)]. The service arm focuses on peer outreach, resource development, and ongoing wellness nights at the drop-in that help to support the knowledge translation activities of the research arm. The CBR project partnership, initiated in late 2005, was developed and continues to be supported through active consultation and exchange of information between researchers and community. The community co-investigators represent sex work, Aboriginal, and youth service organizations. The research is guided by a sex-for-work perspective and adheres to participatory-action research methodologies [32 (link),33 (link)]. In particular the project is guided by the OCAP principles of ownership, control, access and possession initially developed by the First Nations' Governance Committee and subsequently adopted by the Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network (CAAN). Providence Health/UBC Ethics Review Board provided ethical approval for this study. In addition, PACE (Prostitution Alternatives, Counselling and Education (PACE) Society) Policy Group provided community ethics review from a sex work research and policy perspective and the project adheres to these best practices [34 ].
In 2005 a questionnaire (Additional files
When people responded and returned the questionnaire we scanned the data and created a digital data file and linked image file for each completed questionnaire. The scanning was completed using intelligent character recognition and editing software developed in Thailand called Scandevet (Figure
Most recents protocols related to «Sex Workers»
Eligibility criteria were to be an adult woman (≥18 years); a migrant from Venezuela; to have exchanged sex for money, drugs, food, or a place to sleep during the previous 6 months; and to provide written and verbal informed consent.
Data were collected from September through October 2021. At both study sites, FGDs were conducted in a counseling room by a trained member of the study team. Surveys were administered on paper. All FGDs were audio-recorded with permission from participants and conducted in Spanish. Participants did not mention their names while being recorded; to maintain confidentiality, we assigned a numeric code to each participant during the FGD and an alphanumeric code for the paper-based survey. Participants who fully agreed to participate in the interviews were also invited to the FGDs. The discussions had a duration of approximately 60 minutes, and participants were compensated for participating (US$ 10).
Surveys were administered by a research team member in Spanish, took approximately 45 minutes to complete, and had closed-ended questions. The survey included sections on sociodemographics, migration experiences, sexual history, sexual risk behaviors, health care seeking behavior, psychosocial and mental health wellbeing, health care access, social services access, social support, and violence. The survey instrument was piloted with 10 participants who were not included in the final analysis. The instrument has been used in previous local serological and epidemiological studies (15 -17 (link)).
In total, four FGDs were conducted with two to seven participants per group (two FGDs at each study site); 40 surveys were administered (20 at each study site). The FGDs were used to further explore personal experiences with navigating health services, the migratory process to the DR, access to SRH services, state of health and mood, substance abuse, violence, educational level, and knowledge of HIV/STI transmission. Because we could not estimate the population of Venezuelan female sex workers in the DR, a power calculation could not be made; therefore, the sample obtained was based on peer-to-peer invitation at study sites.
Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
Scale for assessment of sexual dysfunction: Scales for sexual dysfunction were applied which included an index for premature ejaculation (IPE) and an index for erectile function (IIEF).[28 (link),29 (link)] Erectile dysfunction, on IIEF, is defined by a score less than 25 on the erectile function domain of IIEF. Premature ejaculation, on the other hand, is not defined within the scale but has been defined in certain studies as a score less than 50% of the total score on IPE.[30 (link),31 (link)] Apart from erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation, other sexual dysfunctions were not assessed in our study. We chose to assess only these two sexual dysfunctions as they are commonly encountered in our clinical population and are easily assessed using structured scales.
Scales for assessment of the sexual relationship, satisfaction, and sexual quality of life: For assessment of sexual relationships, satisfaction, and sexual quality of life, three scales, viz, the Self-esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR),[32 (link)] the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short form (NSSS-S),[33 ] the Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire-Male (SQoL-M),[34 (link)] were used.
SEAR: It is a 14-item scale that assesses self-esteem and relationship through Likert scoring.[32 (link)] A cutoff of 50% has been used in some studies.[31 (link)] Internal consistencies of all domains are more than 0.8.
NSSS-S: It is a Likert-type scale assessing satisfaction associated with the sexual activities of the partner and self. It has two subscales: ego-centered subscale (10 items) and activity/partner-centered subscale (10 items).[33 ] The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the scale is good (>0.9).
SQoL-M: It is an 11-item Likert-type scale, assessing an individual’s perception of his sexual quality of life.[34 (link)] The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the scale is >0.7. All scales were translated into Hindi as per WHO translation-back translation method (except IIEF and IPE which were already available in Hindi).
Data in this study represent a subset of a larger project which explored the mental health and related service use of LGBTIQA+ people, sex workers, and kink-oriented people in rural Tasmania. The larger project included a survey (N = 78) and interviews (N = 33). The current study is focused solely on LGBTIQA+ participants and includes a sample of 66 online survey respondents and 30 interview participants. Data from sex workers and kink-oriented participants have been reported separately.
Top products related to «Sex Workers»
More about "Sex Workers"
This diverse population includes cisgender and transgender individuals, as well as those identifying as male, female, and non-binary.
Sex work encompasses a range of activities, from street-based to escort and online-based services.
Sex workers face unique challenges, including stigma, discrimination, and an increased risk of violence and exploitation.
Research focused on supporting these vulnerable communities is crucial to improving health outcomes and protecting human rights.
Statistical software like SAS version 9.4, Stata 12.0, SPSS version 22.0, STATA version 10, SAS 9.4, Cobas Integra 400, SAS v9.4, R version 3.6.1, Stata version 15, and Aptima can be utilized to analyze data and inform evidence-based interventions.
PubCompare.ai is a powerful tool that empowers sex worker research by using AI-driven protocol optimization to enhance reproducibility and accuracy.
Researchers can easily locate the best protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents through AI-comparisons, ensuring they discover the most effective products and methods to support sex worker communities.
Trun to PubCompare.ai for your research needs.