The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Phenomena > Biologic Function > Rumination, Digestive

Rumination, Digestive

Rumination, Digestive is a medical condition characterized by the involuntary regurgitation of partially digested food from the stomach into the mouth, often accompanied by re-chewing and re-swallowing.
This process can lead to discomfort, malnutrition, and other health issues.
PubCompare.ai's advanced AI-driven tools can help researchers optimize their protocols for studying Rumination, Digestive, allowing them to quickly identify the most effective products and procedures from the latest literature, preprints, and patents.
Leverag*e our AI-powered insights to take your research to the next level and gain a deeper understanding of this complex digestive disorder.

Most cited protocols related to «Rumination, Digestive»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2014
Child Feelings Pain Parent Rumination, Digestive
The ALEQ assesses a broad range of negative life events that typically occur among adolescents, including school/achievement problems, friendship and romantic difficulties, and family problems. Examples of items from the ALEQ include “got a bad report card” to assess school events, “had an argument with a close friend” for friendship events, “boyfriend/girlfriend broke up with you but you still want to go out with them” for romantic events, and “your parents grounded you” for family events. Youth were asked to indicate how often (Likert scale ranging from never (0) to always (4)) these negative events had occurred to them over the past 5 weeks. These ratings were then transformed into dichotomous count of stressors (0=no event; 1=event occurred). The dichotomized ALEQ were used to assess a count of stressors with higher scores indicating more exposure to negative events at a particular time point over the past 5 weeks. The ALEQ demonstrated good validity in past research (Hankin, 2008 ; Hankin et al., in press ).
The 57 different negative life events included in the ALEQ can be categorized into events occurring in an interpersonal (e.g., peers, romantic partners, family) and non-interpersonal (e.g. academics, work) domains (see Hankin & Abramson, 2002 (link)) as well as independent versus dependent types of events. Independent events are those that are believed to befall individuals and are not expected to be related to a person’s characteristics (e.g., close friend moves, death of a relative), whereas dependent events are those that the individual’s characteristics or behaviors may have contributed to the occurrence of these events (e.g., fight with friend, romantic breakup). To create variables for interpersonal and non-interpersonal events as well as independent and dependent events, the list of 57 stressors was categorized independently by the authors with 100% agreement. This resulted in 39 interpersonal events (26 of these as dependent, 13 of these as independent) and 11 as non-interpersonal events (all were categorized as dependent). Seven events were not clearly interpersonal or non-interpersonal, and so they were not included in these categorized variables. Examples for the interpersonal-dependent category of event include: “You had an argument with a close friend,” “Your parents grounded you,” “Your boyfriend/girlfriend criticized you,” and “A boyfriend/girlfriend broke up with you but you still wanted to be with them.” For interpersonal-independent, examples include: “A close friend moved away,” “A close family member couldn’t work due to injury or illness,” and “close family member (parent, sibling) died.” For non-interpersonal events, examples include: “Did poorly on, or failed, a test or class project,” “You didn’t complete the required homework for class,” and “You had to do chores or work you didn’t want to do.” The ALEQ was given at all 4 time points. For the present study, the following variables, interpersonal-dependent, interpersonal-independent, and non-interpersonal, at each of the 4 time points, were used in analyses to test our hypothesis that co-rumination would predict interpersonal-dependent stress generation better than interpersonal-independent or non-interpersonal events.
Publication 2010
Adolescent Family Member Friend Injuries Parent Rumination, Digestive Youth
For multifaceted clinical assessment of the patients’ conditions, we used the following seven well-established scales:
Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS): A scale for measuring lifestyle disabilities of chronic pain patients. Higher scores (on a scale of 0 to 60 points) indicate greater degrees of lifestyle disability [15 (link)].
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A self-reported instrument used to evaluate depression and anxiety in clinical research. The HADS has advantages over other such assessments in that it is efficient in assessing both anxiety and depression. It is composed of 14 questionnaire items and was originally developed for a general medical rather than psychiatric field. Higher scores (0 to 21 points both for anxiety and depression) indicate greater degrees of anxiety and depression [21 (link)].
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS): Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS assesses catastrophizing (rumination, magnification, and helplessness) about pain, with higher scores (0 to 52 points) indicating greater degrees of catastrophizing [14 (link)].
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ): PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire developed to assess the confidence of patients with ongoing pain in performing daily activities while in pain. The PSEQ is applicable to any type of persisting pain. It covers a range of functions, including household chores, socializing, work, and coping with pain without medication. Scores can range from 0 to 60, and higher scores indicate greater degrees of performing activities while in pain [11 (link)].
EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): The EQ-5D assesses (on a scale of 0 to 1.0) the outcome of health-related aspects of QOL (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Zero indicates death and 1.0 indicates complete health [6 (link)–7 (link)].
Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS): This scale assesses the severity of insomnia using diagnostic criteria set forth by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). The eight-item questionnaire evaluates sleep onset, night and early-morning waking, sleep time, sleep quality, frequency and duration of complaints, distress caused by the experience of insomnia, and interference with daily functioning [13 (link)].
Locomo 25: This was developed as a screening tool for locomotive syndrome by a Japanese orthopedic surgeon group in 2008. It consists of 25 questions aimed at musculoskeletal disorders such as walking disability, difficulty in daily living, or suffering pain within the body. Scores can range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate a greater degrees of performing activities while in pain [10 (link)].
Publication 2020
Anxiety Chronic Pain Diagnosis Disability Evaluation Disabled Persons Households Human Body Japanese Musculoskeletal Diseases Orthopedic Surgeons Pain Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Range of Motion, Articular Rumination, Digestive Sleep Sleeplessness Syndrome
Data cleaning will follow the protocol set out by Tabachnick and Fidell [59 ]. Statistical analysis will follow the CONSORT standards [60 (link)]. Unplanned missing data will be handled via multiple imputation (MI). Sensitivity analysis, assuming a variety of MI models (Missing at Random; Missing Not at Random), will verify the likely impact of missing data. Auxiliary variables will be used to improve the estimation of missing data. Primary analyses will be conducted on the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample.
Subsequent analyses will use the Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis [61 (link), 62 (link)]. CACE assumes that randomisation has no direct effect on outcome variable; instead it assumes that the effect of treatment depends on the compliance to treatment (operationalized in terms of completing four out of six modules), which in turn is dependent on randomisation. Therefore, CACE provides estimates of a treatment effect whilst taking into account adherence and compliance with the treatment and whilst also retaining the benefits of randomisation. This model is thus an exemplar of using an Instrumental Variable (IV) where randomisation is the instrument, which is correlated with compliance to the treatment, and directly unrelated to the outcome. In simple terms, CACE finds the difference in the outcome variable between the compliers in the treatment arm and the compliers in the control arm had they been offered the treatment, assuming that the rates of compliance are similar in both arms as a consequence of randomisation.
As a prevention study, the main outcome of interest is the occurrence and time to onset of any depressive episode. Cox regression survival analyses will be performed to examine the effect of the preventive intervention on episode onsets of major depression. Participants will be censored upon measurement dropout or end of study. Although condition will be the main independent variable included in the model, we will also consider sex and history of past depression (the stratification variables).
The secondary outcome of occurrence/time to onset of generalized anxiety disorder will also be assessed using Cox regression survival analyses. Symptom severity and levels of rumination/worry will be examined using mixed model ANCOVAs: between group (ITT/CACE) and repeated measures (3 to 15-month follow-ups), with baseline symptom levels and stratification variables as covariates.
Publication 2016
Anxiety Disorders Arm, Upper Hypersensitivity Major Depressive Disorder Rumination, Digestive
The PCS includes 13 items assessing the thoughts and feelings associated with pain.[4 ] The PCS assesses three dimensions of pain catastrophizing: Rumination (4 items; Questions 8, 9, 10, and 11), magnification (3 items; Questions 6, 7, and 13), and helplessness (6 items; Questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12). Patients rate on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all, 1 = to a slight degree, 2 = to a moderate degree, 3 = to a great degree, 4 = all the time) the degree to which they have the described thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain. A total PCS score can be computed by summing the score on all the items, with higher scores indicating a higher tendency of pain catastrophizing. The scores for the three PCS subscales can be obtained in a similar manner. In the original study, a PCS total score of ≥30 was considered to be indicative of a clinically relevant level of catastrophizing. Although, the author in a more recent study found a cutoff score ≥24 might be a more evidence-based cut score.[5 (link)]
Publication 2017
Feelings Pain Patients Rumination, Digestive Thinking

Most recents protocols related to «Rumination, Digestive»

Questionnaires will be completed through a secure, web-based survey system hosted by the research centre so that participants can complete questionnaires electronically, either at home or during their visit to the research centre. Online questionnaires are sent via a national secure mail platform used by citizens in regular correspondence with public institutions and the health care system.
Measures include several salient domains in the clinical characterisation of the patient, among others, assessments of demographics (e.g., ethnicity, education, and marital status); medical and psychiatric history; depressive symptoms and impact of depression behaviour and day-to-day life; treatment preferences and expectations, life experiences; and a broad range of state and trait psychometrics. Some questionnaires will only be given to patients in subcohorts I-II (Table 2).

Questionaries Additional questionnaires for the subcohort I-II only are in bold

Symptom profile and SeverityCognitive styleUpbringing and life historyFunctioning and quality of life
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – self-report (IDS-SR) [34 (link)]Mentalisation Questionnaire (MZQ) [35 (link)]Online Stimulant and Family History Assessment Module (OS-FHAM) [11 (link)]Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) [36 (link)]
Dimension of Anger Reactions (DAR-5) [37 (link)]Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) [38 (link)]Child abuse and trauma scale (CATS) [39 (link)]Modified Sheehan Disability Score (mSDS)
Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) [40 (link)]Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) [41 (link)]Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) [42 (link)]WHO 5 wellbeing index (WHO-5)
Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [43 (link)]Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) [44 (link)]Stressful Life Events (SLE) [45 (link)]Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) [46 (link)]
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) [47 (link)]Short form of Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) [48 (link)]Questions from the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (CAMB) [49 (link)]
Symptom checklist (SCL-10) [50 (link)]Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) [51 (link)]Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R) [52 (link)]
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) [53 (link)]
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [54 (link)]
Publication 2023
Abuse, Child Alexithymia Anger Anxiety Disorders Attention Awareness Cognition Disorders Depressive Symptoms Disabled Persons Ethnicity Life Experiences Mentalization Metacognition Mindfulness Parent Patients Pleasure Psychometrics Rumination, Digestive Wounds and Injuries

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Rumination, Digestive Thinking

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Burnout, Psychological Child Emotional Regulation Gender Motivation Parent Rumination, Digestive

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Burnout, Psychological Child Emotional Regulation Gender neuro-oncological ventral antigen 2, human Parent Rumination, Digestive
Before surgery, demographic information was collected through a patient-reported questionnaire. Preoperative anxiety and depressed mood were assessed using a 0 (not anxious or depressed) to 10 (extremely anxious or depressed) scale. The Chinese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) [10 (link)] was used to evaluate rumination, magnification, and helplessness associated with pain. Preoperative chronic pain (lasting for at least 3 months) was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [11 (link)]. Preoperative health-related quality of life was evaluated using the validated Chinese version of EuroQol five-dimensional-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire [12 (link)]. Postoperative pain was assessed using part of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) [13 (link)]. Specifically, patients reported the worst, average and lowest pain scores over the last 24 hours and the current pain scores related to the surgery at the time of interview. Pain resolution was defined as two consecutive reports of no pain, with no analgesics or pain control therapies needed.
The patients’ medical records were reviewed to obtain the Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgery and analgesia information. Data on surgical complications were obtained from medical records during the hospital stay and patient self-reports after discharge. Major complications were defined as complications of grade III or higher according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification [14 (link)]. Because of the various types and routes of opioids that were prescribed, all opioids were converted to oral morphine equivalents (MEQs) using standard formulas [15 (link)].
Publication 2023
Analgesics Chinese Chronic Pain Diet, Formula Management, Pain Mood Morphine Operative Surgical Procedures Opioids Pain Pain, Postoperative Patient Discharge Patients Rumination, Digestive

Top products related to «Rumination, Digestive»

Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, United Kingdom, Cameroon, China, Denmark, Canada, Israel, New Caledonia, Germany, Poland, India, France, Ireland, Australia
SAS 9.4 is an integrated software suite for advanced analytics, data management, and business intelligence. It provides a comprehensive platform for data analysis, modeling, and reporting. SAS 9.4 offers a wide range of capabilities, including data manipulation, statistical analysis, predictive modeling, and visual data exploration.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Austria, Canada
SPSS version 27 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The core function of SPSS is to enable users to perform a wide range of statistical analyses on their data, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Austria, Morocco, Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, China, France, Denmark, Norway, Hungary, Malaysia, Israel, Finland, Spain
MATLAB is a high-performance programming language and numerical computing environment used for scientific and engineering calculations, data analysis, and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for solving complex mathematical and computational problems.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Denmark, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Australia, Israel
Stata is a general-purpose statistical software package that provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, management, and visualization. It offers a wide range of statistical methods, including regression analysis, time series analysis, and multilevel modeling, among others. Stata is designed to facilitate the analysis of complex data sets and support the entire research process, from data import to report generation.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, China
The Tim Trio is a versatile laboratory equipment that serves as a temperature-controlled magnetic stirrer. It features three independent stirring positions, allowing simultaneous operation of multiple samples. The device maintains a consistent temperature range to ensure accurate and reliable results during experimental procedures.
Sourced in United States
JMP Pro v. 16.0 is a statistical discovery software developed by SAS Institute. It provides advanced analytics and data visualization capabilities to help users explore, analyze, and gain insights from their data.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Belgium, Austria, Australia, Spain
SPSS is a comprehensive statistical software package that enables data analysis, data management, and data visualization. It provides a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, predictive analytics, and advanced modeling. SPSS is designed to help users efficiently manage and analyze large datasets, making it a valuable tool for researchers, statisticians, and data analysts.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Austria, Germany
SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and visualization.
SPSS (version 3.3) is a software package developed for statistical analysis. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The software is designed to handle a wide variety of data types and offers a range of statistical procedures to assist users in their research and decision-making processes.

More about "Rumination, Digestive"

Rumination, also known as regurgitation or merycism, is a digestive disorder characterized by the involuntary, repeated regurgitation of partially digested food from the stomach into the mouth.
This condition can lead to discomfort, malnutrition, and other health concerns.
Researchers studying Rumination, Digestive can leverage advanced AI-driven tools like those offered by PubCompare.ai to optimize their research protocols.
These tools can help identify the most effective products and procedures from the latest literature, preprints, and patents, allowing researchers to gain a deeper understanding of this complex disorder.
Rumination, Digestive is often associated with other gastrointestinal conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and gastroparesis.
Statistical software like SAS 9.4, SPSS version 27, and MATLAB can be used to analyze data and identify patterns related to the disorder.
Researchers may also leverage Stata, Tim Trio, and JMP Pro v. 16.0 to further explore the risk factors, symptoms, and treatment options for Rumination, Digestive.
SPSS statistical software, including SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 and SPSS (version 3.3), can be utilized to conduct in-depth analyses and draw insights from the available data.
By incorporating these AI-powered tools and statistical software, researchers can take their studies on Rumination, Digestive to the next level, optimizing their protocols and gaining a more comprehensive understanding of this complex digestive disorder.