Water samples were collected in clean and autoclaved Nalgene (Nalge Europe Ltd., Hereford, UK) sampling bottles (volume 4.2 l), stored in dark cooling boxes at 4 °C during transport and processed within 6 h after collection. For molecular biological analysis a known volume (usually 4.2 l) of spring water was filtered through polycarbonate membrane filters (Isopore™, 45 mm diameter, 0.2 μm pore size, Millipore Corp., Bedford, USA). Immediately after filtration, filters were frozen and stored at −80 °C until nucleic acid extraction. Nucleic acid extraction was performed as described by Griffiths et al. (2000) (link), with a DNA precipitation using isopropanol instead of the polyethylene glycol. Recovered DNA was redissolved in 50 μl of sterile bi-distilled water and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. All extracted sample DNAs were checked for amplifiable bacterial DNA and PCR inhibition by applying a general 16S rRNA gene PCR assay (Winter et al., 2007 (link)). Occasionally during Monitoring replicate samples (2 or 3 times 4.2 litres) were taken and processed separately (n =9). The sample replicates yielded very reproducible quantitative microbial source tracking results (e.g. the median coefficient of variation of BacR ME was 7%). The DNA from four samples (one each from May, April and September 2005 and one from January 2006) apparently was lost during PCR extraction and the respective sampling dates were excluded from all analysis. Enumeration of E. coli, enterococci, presumptive Clostridium perfringens and heterotrophic plate count at 22°C was performed as described in the respective ISO standard methods (ISO, 1999 , 2000a , 2000b , 2002 ). Numbers of aerobic sporeforming bacteria were determined by pasteurisation of the water sample at 60°C for 15 min, membrane filtration and incubation on yeast extract agar at 22°C for 7 days.
Pasteurization
This technique, named after the renowned scientist Louis Pasteur, is widely used in the dairy, beverage, and food processing industries to enhance food safety and extend shelf life.
Pasteurization can be optimized through the use of advanced AI-driven tools, such as PubCompare.ai, which allow researchers to easily identify the best pasteurization protocols and products from the scientific literature, preprints, and patent databases.
By leveraging these intelligent tools, researchers can enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of their pasteurization research, leading to improved food quality and safety for consumers.
Experieence the power of AI-assisted pasteurization optimization with PubCompare.ai.
Most cited protocols related to «Pasteurization»
A four-stage process was undertaken to identify the ultra-processed foods from both the adult and the youth FFQs. First, all food items in the FFQs across different waves of data collection were complied. Food items that were nearly identical between FFQs but were presented with minor differences were captured as separate items (e.g., ‘Cold breakfast cereal (1 bowl)’ and ‘Cold breakfast cereal (1 serving)’). This was done to make sure that no food item was overlooked. FFQs from every 4 years of the NHS-I (1986–2010), the NHS-II (1991–2015), the HPFS (1986–2014), from 1996, 1998, 2001 for GUTS-I and from 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011 for GUTS-II were used.
Second, three researchers working independently assigned foods in the adult (N.K, S.R, E.M) and the youth (N.K, M.D, E.M) cohorts to one of the four NOVA groups based on their grade of processing – unprocessed/minimally processed foods (G1), processed culinary ingredients (G2), processed foods (G3) and ultra-processed foods (G4). Food assignment was guided by the definition, examples and supplementary material published by the proponents of the NOVA classification(1 (link)). Categorisation was an iterative process requiring the review of the original FFQs used at each wave of data collection to contextualise food items within the larger food lists. Food preparations made from multiple ingredients or different food items that were presented jointly in the FFQ were not disaggregated into their different components. Additionally, the nutrient profile of food items, their actual amounts consumed by the study participants or participant demographics were not considered at any point in the categorisation process. Instead, the original food item as it was listed in the FFQ was categorised in its entirety.
At the third stage, categorisation between researchers was triangulated. Food items for which there was consensus in the categorisation among all researchers were assigned to their NOVA group. A food item was flagged for further scrutiny and shortlisted in case a researcher was unable to assign it to a NOVA group or in cases of disagreement in categorisation by any two researchers.
At stage four, an expert panel comprising of three senior nutrition epidemiologists (F.F.Z; T.F; Q.S) with substantial experience working with the dietary intake in these cohorts, was convened to review and discuss the categorisation of the short-listed products. All discussions were additionally informed by the following resources:
Consultations with the research dietitians. The team of research dietitians, led by L.S, was responsible for overseeing the collection of dietary data and for ascertaining the nutrient composition of food items across all Harvard cohorts. They shared their insights obtained from gathering supplementary data, tracking new and reformulated products available in the supermarket, and conducting multiple pilot studies with cohort participants.
Cohort-specific documents. These resources provided more insight into the extent of processing of certain FFQ food items by highlighting information on the specific ingredients used in recipes and food preparations, the proportion by weight of individual ingredients to the final recipe or a more detailed description of food items (whether the food was canned or salted or boiled, the brand name of certain packaged foods, etc.).
Supermarket scans. The ingredient lists of the first five brands of specific products that were displayed on the Walmart website in 2019 and 2020 were scrutinised. They served as a proxy for establishing the level of processing for a small proportion of food items for which limited information was available from the resources listed above.
As a first step, food subgroups estimated to contain only food codes having <104 CFU/g were identified by 3 individuals (MLM, MES, and RH) (
Although “pickled” fruits or vegetables could be acidified and not fermented, the food descriptions were inadequate to distinguish between these 2 possibilities. The experts agreed to assume these were fermented or partially fermented in the case of refrigerated and non-heat-treated products and assigned all such pickled foods to Med. For the last step, intakes of Med and Hi categories were determined by linking microbe definitions to food codes. A fourth category was also developed, MedHi, consisting of an aggregate of consumers of foods from Med, Hi, or both Med and Hi categories.
For preparing the maqui-citrus beverages, maqui powder was mixed with citrus juices to obtain the base beverage. Then, the three selected sweeteners were added, in different concentrations, in order to obtain an acceptable taste and to obtain the different beverages analyzed in the present work. The beverages underwent a pasteurization treatment through the application of 85 °C for 58 s. Afterwards, the mixtures were bottled and stored at 5 °C until being consumed by the volunteers.
As a preliminary task, the beverages developed were characterized on their polyphenolic composition. With this objective, the juices were centrifuged at 10,500 rpm, for 5 min (Sigma 1–13, B. Braun Biotech International, Osterode, Germany). The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45 µm PVDF filter (Millex HV13, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and analyzed by RP-HPLC-DAD. The identification and quantification of anthocyanins was performed by applying the method previously reported [16 (link),31 (link)]. Briefly, a chromatographic analysis of samples (10 µL), for the identification and quantification of anthocyanins was carried out on a Luna 5µm C18(2)100 Å column (250 × 4.6 mm), using Security Guard Cartridges PFD 4 × 3.0 mm, both supplied by Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The solvents used for the chromatographic separation were Milli-Q water/formic acid (95.0:5.0, v/v) (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B), in a linear gradient (time, %B) (0, 15%); (20, 30%); (30, 40%); (35, 60%); (40, 90%); (44, 90%); (45, 15%), and (50, 15%), using an Agilent Technologies 1220 Infinity Liquid Chromatograph, equipped with an autoinjector (G1313, Agilent Technologies) and a Diode Array Detector (1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatograms were recorded and processed on an Agilent ChemStation (Santa Clara, CA, USA) for LC 3D systems. The flow rate was 0.9 mL/min. The quantification of anthocyanins was done on UV chromatograms recorded at 520 nm as cyanidin-3-O-glucoside at 520 nm and expressed as mg per 100 mL of juice.
Test specimens were taken from different production batches (n = 5). Approximately 3.8 kg cheese (17 balls) was obtained from 20 L of milk. Each ball of cheese was 220 g. The cheese was prepared in pilot plant scale using pilot industrial equipment, and each batch was analyzed twice.
Most recents protocols related to «Pasteurization»
Conventional treatment of Homogenization-Pasteurization (H-P) was also applied to the RP using an indirect heat system composed of a double-stage homogenizer positioned upstream (Model X68, Soavi B. and Figli, S.P.A., Parma, Italy) and a multitube tubular heat exchanger at a flow rate of 1000 L/h (laminar flow) (6500/010, GEA Finnah GmbH, Ahaus, Germany). Beverages were homogenized at pressures of 18 MPa (first stage-valve) and 4 MPa (second stage-valve) at 65 °C, and subsequently pasteurized at 80 °C for a holding time of 15 s. Samples (RP, H-P, 200 MPa, and 300 MPa) were collected in sterile glass bottles of 1 L of capacity with twist-off caps (Apiglass Envases y Material Apícola, S.L., Barcelona, Spain) inside a laminar flow cabin (Mini-V cabin, Telstar Technologies, S.L., Terrassa, Spain) and were stored at refrigeration temperature (4 °C) until their analyses
Microbiological shelf-life of stored beverages corresponded to 3, 5, 30 and 57 days for the RP, H-P and UHPH processed beverages at 200 and 300 MPa, respectively, according to Codina-Torrella et al. [9 (link)].
Top products related to «Pasteurization»
More about "Pasteurization"
This process, named after the renowned scientist Louis Pasteur, is widely employed in the dairy, beverage, and broader food industries to enhance food safety and extend product shelf life.
Optimizing pasteurization parameters can be facilitated through the use of advanced AI-driven tools like PubCompare.ai.
These intelligent platforms enable researchers to easily identify the most effective pasteurization protocols and products by analyzing scientific literature, preprints, and patent databases.
By leveraging PubCompare.ai's capabilities, researchers can enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of their pasteurization research, leading to improved food quality and safety for consumers.
Pasteurization techniques can be further enhanced through the use of specialized equipment and analytical methods.
Circulating water baths provide precise temperature control for experimental pasteurization, while centrifuges like the Centrifuge 5702R enable efficient sample separation and preparation.
Microbial analysis techniques, such as the GasPak 100 system and MALDI-TOF MS, can be employed to verify the efficacy of pasteurization in eliminating target pathogens like the Lm EGD-e (ATCC BAA-679) strain.
Additionally, tools like TRIzol reagent and Columbia blood agar can be utilized for nucleic acid extraction and microbial culturing, respectively, to support pasteurization research.
By combining the power of AI-driven optimization, specialized equipment, and advanced analytical methods, researchers can drive continuous improvements in pasteurization processes, ensuring the delivery of safe, high-quality, and nutritious food products to consumers.
Experieence the transformative impact of AI-assisted pasteurization optimization with PubCompare.ai.