The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear energy is a form of energy generation that utilizes the nuclear reactions of atomic nuclei to produce electricity.
This process involves the controlled splitting or fusion of atomic nuclei, releasing large amounts of energy.
Nuclear energy is a clean, reliable, and efficient source of power, but it also carries risks and challenges related to radioactive waste management, safety, and public perception.
Researchers in this field work to optimize nuclear reactor designs, enhance safety protocols, and develop innovative nuclear fuel technologies to address these concerns and promote the wider adoption of nuclear power as a sustainable energy solution.

Most cited protocols related to «Nuclear Energy»

Autodock uses interaction maps for docking. Prior to the actual docking run these maps are calculated by the program autogrid. For each ligand atom type, the interaction energy between the ligand atom and the receptor is calculated for the entire binding site which is discretized through a grid. This has the advantage that interaction energies do not have to be calculated at each step of the docking process but only looked up in the respective grid map. In addition to speeding up a docking runs the grid maps on their own can also provide value hints for ligand optimization. Since a grid map represents the interaction energy as a function of the coordinates their visual inspection may reveal potential unsaturated hydrogen acceptors or donors or unfavourable overlaps between the ligand and the receptor. The plugin therefore provides the functionality to visualize these grid maps in PyMOL. The maps generated by autogrid are converted to a file format readable by PyMOL (DX format) which allows to draw isosurfaces and isomeshes analogous to electron density maps. Since several maps can be loaded and controlled simultaneously, a rapid inspection of several interaction types is made very easily. Figure 3 shows how these grid maps can be controlled via the plugin.

Autodock grid maps displayed with different contour levels. a Map for interactions of aliphatic carbon atoms at contour level 5 kcal/mol. b Same map at contour level −0.3 kcal/mol. c Hydrogen bond donor map at contour level −0.5 kcal/mol

In Fig. 3A an isosurface at a contour level of 5 kcal/mol for the interaction of the protein with aliphatic carbon atoms is shown. Such a setting may be used to get a visual impression of the overall shape of the binding site. Ligand modifications which cause a penetration of such a wall will most likely not enhance the affinity. In Fig. 3B the same map is visualized at a contour level of −0.3 kcal/mol. As can be seen, the shape of the surface, here shown as isomesh, roughly describes an envelope of the ligand and reveals putative spots of attractive interactions that may guide further ligand optimization. Likewise, hydrogen bond donor or acceptor interaction maps can guide ligand optimization since they might reveal unsaturated acceptor or donor positions (Fig. 3C).
The plugin provides functionality to handle different interaction maps and representations at different contour levels at the same time and hence, offers the possibility to visualize different binding site properties which may provide valuable insights for structure-based drug design.
Publication 2010
Binding Sites Carbon Donors Electrons Exanthema Hydrogen Hydrogen Bonds Ligands Microtubule-Associated Proteins Nuclear Energy Proteins Tissue Donors Vision
The input to the FireDock algorithm is a set of candidate complexes. Each complex consists of two proteins: receptor and ligand. The method refines each candidate and ranks all the candidates according to the binding energy.
The FireDock (16 (link)) method includes three main steps:

Side-chain optimization: The side-chain flexibility of the receptor and the ligand is modeled by a rotamer library. The optimal combination of rotamers for the interface residues is found by solving an integer LP problem (30–32 ). This LP minimizes a partial energy function consisting repulsive van der Waals and rotamer probabilities terms.

Rigid-body minimization: This minimization stage is performed by a MC technique that attempts to optimize an approximate binding energy by refining the orientation of the ligand structure. The binding energy consists of softened repulsive and attractive van der Waals terms. In each cycle of the MC method, a local minimization is performed by the quasi-Newton algorithm (33 ,34 ). By default, 50 MC cycles are performed.

Scoring and ranking: This final ranking stage attempts to identify the near-native refined solutions. The ranking is performed according to a binding energy function that includes a variety of energy terms: desolvation energy (atomic contact energy, ACE), van der Waals interactions, partial electrostatics, hydrogen and disulfide bonds, π-stacking and aliphatic interactions, rotamer's; probabilities and more.

The FireDock method was extensively tested (16 (link)) on docking candidates generated by the PatchDock method (10 ,21 (link)) for cases from benchmark 1.0 and 2.0 (28 (link),29 (link)). FireDock succeeded in ranking a near-native solution in the top 15 predictions for 83% of the 30 enzyme–inhibitor test cases and for 78% of the 18 semi-unbound antibody–antigen test cases.
Publication 2008
Antigens cDNA Library Disgust Disulfides Electrostatics Enzyme Inhibitors Human Body Hydrogen Immunoglobulins Ligands Muscle Rigidity Nuclear Energy Proteins
The ZDOCK algorithm, which followed from initial efforts in FFT-based protein docking [18] (link), [19] (link) and was described in detail by Chen and Weng [10] (link), includes the following steps (not including the pre-processing step of marking surface atoms and atom types in PDB files). The terms “receptor” and “ligand” refer to the two input proteins, with the receptor generally being the larger protein or known to function as a receptor in vivo (e.g. an antibody in an antibody/antigen interaction).
ZD1. Center receptor coordinates at origin based on center of mass.ZD2. Center ligand coordinates at origin based on center of mass.ZD3. Select cubic grid size to contain centered molecules for FFT.ZD4. Discretize receptor, assigning scores to 3D grid(s) of complex numbers.
ZD5. Rotate input ligand to random orientation, if specified.
ZD6. Rotate ligand to Euler angles from uniformly distributed set, and discretize.
ZD7. Perform 3D FFT to compute convolution between ligand and receptor grids, and select top scoring position from the resultant grid.ZD8. Repeat steps 6–7 for a total of 3,600 ligand rotations (15° angular sampling) or 54,000 ligand rotations (6° angular sampling).
Here we present major improvements to ZDOCK's initial orientation and FFT procedures (bold steps above), while not modifying the discretization protocols that embody the ZDOCK scoring function. Previous ZDOCK versions and their scoring terms include: ZDOCK 1.3 [10] (link): Grid-based shape complementarity, atomic contact energy (ACE; [20] (link)), electrostatics: ZDOCK 2.1 [21] (link): Pairwise shape complementarity (PSC); ZDOCK 2.3 [14] (link): PSC, ACE, electrostatics; ZDOCK 3.0 [11] (link): PSC, interface atomic contact energy (IFACE), electrostatics.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2011
Antigens Complement System Proteins Cuboid Bone Electrostatics Immunoglobulins Ligands Nuclear Energy Proteins Reproduction
The first set of protocols (Table I) we considered relax the sidechains but keep the backbone fixed. Sidechains are optimized in two steps—first, discrete combinatorial rotamer optimization and second, continuous optimization of the sidechain torsion angles. The combinatorial rotamer optimization (referred to as repacking throughout the remainder of the text) is carried out using Monte Carlo simulated annealing with the Dunbrack backbone dependent rotamer library.9 (link) The continuous optimization is carried out using quasi-Newton minimization and is referred to as minimization throughout the remainder of the text.
We experimented with two energy functions at both the repacking and minimization steps. The first is the standard Rosetta all atom energy function used in prediction and design calculations;10 (link) we refer to this as “hard-rep” because the Lennard-Jones repulsive interactions are not damped, thus atomic clashes incur very large energetic penalties. The second has the repulsive interactions at short atomic separations damped as described in the Supporting Information but is otherwise identical; we refer to this as “soft-rep” because small atomic overlaps are not heavily penalized.
We also experimented with allowing different numbers of residues surrounding the site of mutation to be repacked. As indicated in the Table I protocol summary, we considered three possibilities: first, only repacking the mutated residue, second, only residues within 8 Å of the mutated residue, and third, all residues.
We also explored protocols which carry out backbone torsion angle minimization following sidechain repacking in attempts to more accurately model the structural consequences of mutations. To prevent the backbone from moving too much from the native structure, in some protocols, we included distance constraints during the backbone minimization as described in the Supporting Information.
Finally, we explored protocols which more extensively search through alternative backbone conformations. We developed a Monte Carlo simulated annealing protocol that generates backbone conformations with ideal bond lengths and bond angles that uniformly sample the space of conformations surrounding any given native structure. The protocol carries out 100,000 moves each consisting of a small random perturbation of the backbone torsion angles; the scoring function prevents sampling from deviating by more than a specified tolerance from the starting structure. Single side chain rotamer flips are attempted at one-tenth the frequency of backbone moves. The resulting structures have small and partially compensating changes in nearly all the backbone torsion angles. The lowest energy structure sampled during each trajectory is subjected to backbone and sidechain minimization using the hard-rep energy function. Full details are provided in the Supplementary Information.
Publication 2010
cDNA Library CFLAR protein, human Disgust Immune Tolerance Mutation Nuclear Energy Vertebral Column
Jobs sent from the web server are entered into a queuing system for all jobs being processed. Once ready, the given protein structure is received by the server which performs the i3Drefine algorithm (8 (link)). i3Drefine is basically an iterative version of 3Drefine refinement protocol. In i3Drefine, the starting model is refined using 3Drefine protocol (7 (link)) and the resulting refined model is again processed by the same method. This iteration is done five times in order to generate five refined models for the starting structure. Since 3Drefine employs restrained backbone flexibility during energy minimization, such an iterative scheme is effective to escape any local minima and move closer to the native structure. Upon completion, the results of the structure refinement are displayed on a unique web page and an email notification is sent, if specified.
The i3Drefine refinement process involves an iterative implementation of two-steps: optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomic-level energy minimization using a combination of physics and knowledge based force fields; implemented using the molecular modeling package MESHI (9 (link)). Given a starting structure for refinement, a combination of local geometry restraint and a conformational search is first performed to optimize the hydrogen bonding network. Subsequently, 200 000 steps of energy minimization is employed on the optimized model using highly convergent limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shannon (L-BFGS) (12 ) algorithm or until convergence to machine precision using a customized all-atom force field. The force field consists of a combination of physics based and knowledge based terms. The physics-based terms include the energetic contributions of the bonded interactions described in ENCAD potential (13 ) (bond length, bond angle and torsion angle) along with a tethering term of the Cα and Cβ atoms (7 (link)) and the knowledge-based terms include the atomic pairwise potential of mean force (6 (link)) and explicit hydrogen bonding potential. The resulting energy-minimized model is the refined model. A detailed analysis of the relative importance of these energy terms and the i3Drefine algorithm has been presented in the published work of i3Drefine (7 (link),8 (link)). Figure 1 visualizes the 3Drefine web server workflow.
Publication 2016
ENKAD Memory Nuclear Energy Proteins Vertebral Column

Most recents protocols related to «Nuclear Energy»

The HYNIC-FAPI probe was chemically modified and synthesized from Nanchang Tanzhen Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (Jiangxi, China). The purity of HYNIC-FAPI was 98%, and the structure of the product was identified by MS (Fig. 1). 99mTc is obtained from the 99Mo-99mTc generator supplied by China Atomic Energy Research Institute (Beijing, China). 10 mg tricine (Tricine buffer, free acid) and 20 mg TPPTS (Tris(3-sulfonatophenyl) phosphine, sodium salt) dissolved in 5 ml saline (95%), then 50 μl HYNIC‑FAPI (1 μg/μl), 50 μl 99mT (185 MBq) and 25 μl fresh SnCl2·2H2O(1 mg/ml in 0.2 M HCL) were added into 200 μl mixture above in turn. All the reagents were mixed and heated at 100 °C for 30 min to synthesize [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-FAPI.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Acids Buffers Nuclear Energy phosphine Saline Solution Sodium Sodium Chloride tricine Tromethamine
The theoretical calculations in this part of the work are based on density functional theory,16,17 using the Vienna ab initio calculation package for first-principles calculations.18,19 In the calculation process, the projected enhanced wave electric potential (PAW) method is used.20 The exchange-correlation functional uses the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) function combined with the PBE functional21 (link) and the local density approximation (LDA). The PBE + U approximation method is proven to effectively improve the accuracy of the performance calculation of actinide materials.22,23 Therefore, U = 3.0 is used as a calculation parameter considering the strong correlation effect of 5f orbital, which is consistent with the calculation parameters of Torres and Pegg et al.24–26 The calculation uses the Monkhorst–Pack method to divide the simple Briyuan area by 5 × 3 × 3 K points.27 The truncation can be 500 eV, and when the atomic energy volume converges to 1.0 × 10−5 eV per atom, and the atomic force converges below 0.01 eV s−1, the structural relaxation optimization is completed. All calculations are done under periodic boundary conditions. Considering the computational cost, a supercell of size 2 × 2 × 1 is used to calculate properties such as energy and electrons.
Publication 2023
Actinoid Series Elements Electricity Electrons Familial Mediterranean Fever Nuclear Energy
Calculations of the structures of the 2D CdSe quantum nanosheets were performed using first‐principles DFT calculations implemented in the Vienna Ab‐initio Simulation Package (VASP). Specifically, projector augmented wave (PAW) potentials and the Perdew‐Burke Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) were employed. The plane cutoff energy was set at 400 eV, and Gaussian smearing was used with the width of 0.1 eV. For all CdSe nanosheets, the convergence criterion was 10−5 eV for electronic energy, and the Hellmann–Feynman force was converged to 10−2 eV Å−1 for the ionic relaxation. A slab model and z‐direction vacuum were used to simulate the CdSe nanosheets. For wurtzite‐CdSe, the slab model consists of seven Cd–Se atomic monolayers (≈1.4 nm thickness) with the (112¯0) surface termination and each monolayer contains one Cd and one Se atomic layers. After the reconstruction of the nonpolar (112¯0) surface, supercell structures were created by forming Se defects in the wurtzite‐CdSe structures obtained by the surface reconstruction. For zinc blende‐CdSe, the slab model consists of 7 atomic monolayers, and each monolayer was a combination of one Cd and one Se atomic layers. After the (001) surface was reconstructed in the same way as described above, Se defects were formed to create supercell structures. The surface reconstruction processes were conducted by following the modified methods of previous works.[76, 77] Supercell structures of wurtzite‐CdSe nanosheets with Se defects (Figures S9 and S10, Supporting Information) and zinc blende‐CdSe nanosheets with Se defects (Figure S11, Supporting Information) were calculated with Monkhorst‐Pack 4 × 3 × 1 k‐points and 4 × 4 × 1 k‐points, respectively. To consider the computational cost and accuracy of the energy outcome, it was identified that a vacuum space greater than 10 Å along the z‐axis was the optimal value for the slab model. The distance between supercell structures was far enough that there was no electronic interference between them. In the wurtzite‐CdSe nanosheets, all atoms used in the calculation were not fixed, except for the atoms in the middle layer. By contrast, all atoms in other supercells were flexible. The Se vacancy formation energy was calculated to demonstrate that Se defects can be caused by electron beam irradiation. The vacancy formation energy (Ef) was calculated as per the Equation 1.
Ef=EvacEbulkμx where Evac is the energy of supercells with defects and Ebulk is the energy of original structure before the formation of defects. The chemical potential µx of the Se atom was considered as the energy of the isolated atom.[78]
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
ECHO protocol Electrons Epistropheus Ions Nuclear Energy Radiotherapy Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Vacuum Zinc
The output properties
for the GPR models are atomic properties calculated using ab initio methods. In our previous work using active learning,
the atomic property being modeled was the IQA energy. The IQA energy
is used in atomic simulations for intramolecular interaction, that
is, taking care of the internal energy balance of a flexible molecule.
The IQA energy captures the intra-atomic energy along with the interaction
energy with all atoms other than a given atom A in
the molecule, where EintraA is the intra-atomic
energy of atom A, VclAB is the classical
potential energy between atoms A and B, and VxcA is the exchange-correlation potential energy
between atoms A and B. Explicit
formulae defining these energies can be found in the original IQA
publication44 (link) and in work62 (link) that made IQA compatible with DFT, for the first time.
In an MD simulation, the forces to apply to each atom can be calculated
from the derivative of the predicted energy allowing the modeling
of a single molecule in vacuo.
FFLUX is a polarizable
force field, which requires electrostatic information to cover intermolecular
interactions. Short-range electrostatics are captured by the IQA energy,
specifically in the interaction energy (EinterAB) of the IQA energy. For long-range electrostatic interactions,
FFLUX uses multipole moment predictions63 (link)−65 (link) from GPR models as an
input45 (link) to the SPME method.48 (link) This allows FFLUX to capture monopole–monopole,
monopole–dipole, dipole–dipole, etc. interactions using
multipole moments up to hexadecapole moments (L
= 4).
Training multipole moment models is similar to training
IQA energies.
In fact, the training process is identical, other than for the replacement
of the training outputs by the specific multipole moment being trained.
It is important to note that it is required that the multipole moments
are in the ALF because the features are expressed with respect to
the ALF. The multipole moments are typically computed in the global
frame so a rotation to the ALF is needed prior to training. Then,
when using the GPR multipole moment models in a simulation, the multipole
moments must be expressed with respect to the global frame. Thus,
the multipole moments must be rotated from the predicted local frame
moments back to the global frame.
Quantum chemical calculations
were carried out using the program66 GAUSSIAN09
at B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory,
while the QTAIM calculations were carried out using the external program67 AIMAll19.
Numerical errors in the computation
of the atomic properties cause
an integration error to the training input. Certain geometries may
result in an especially large integration error and may not be suitable
for use in the GPR model. Such geometries must thus be removed from
the training set prior to training, in a process known as scrubbing.
Points are scrubbed from the training set if the point’s integration
error is greater than the threshold of 0.001.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Electrostatics Nuclear Energy Reading Frames Solid Phase Microextraction
We trained a machine-learning neural network potential for the Mg–O–H system using the NEP and GPUMD71 method, which directly uses relative atomic coordinates to describe local atomic environments to obtain atomic energies, while forces are obtained by taking the derivatives of the energies. Our dataset was built by choosing 16,000 configures in the trajectories from AIMD in the NVT ensemble in the pressure range from 300 GPa to 800 GPa with a temperature step of 1000 K from 3000 to 7000 K.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
derivatives Nuclear Energy Pressure

Top products related to «Nuclear Energy»

Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Canada, Japan, Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Israel, New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark, India, Poland, Sweden, Argentina, Netherlands, Brazil, Macao, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Cameroon, Hong Kong, Portugal, Morocco, Hungary, Finland, Puerto Rico, Holy See (Vatican City State), Gabon, Bulgaria, Norway, Jamaica
DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium) is a cell culture medium formulated to support the growth and maintenance of a variety of cell types, including mammalian cells. It provides essential nutrients, amino acids, vitamins, and other components necessary for cell proliferation and survival in an in vitro environment.
Sourced in United States
Materials Studio is a comprehensive software suite designed for materials science research and development. It provides a range of tools and functionalities for modeling, simulation, and analysis of materials at the atomic, molecular, and mesoscopic scales. The core function of Materials Studio is to enable users to understand, predict, and design the properties of materials through computational methods.
Sourced in Canada
IR-79 is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis of materials using infrared spectroscopy. It is capable of measuring the absorption and transmission of infrared light through samples, providing information about the chemical composition and molecular structure of the tested materials.
Sourced in United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, France, Italy, Switzerland, Australia, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Singapore, India, Netherlands, Sweden, New Zealand, Portugal, Poland, Israel, Lithuania, Hong Kong, Argentina, Ireland, Austria, Czechia, Cameroon, Taiwan, Province of China, Morocco
Lipofectamine 2000 is a cationic lipid-based transfection reagent designed for efficient and reliable delivery of nucleic acids, such as plasmid DNA and small interfering RNA (siRNA), into a wide range of eukaryotic cell types. It facilitates the formation of complexes between the nucleic acid and the lipid components, which can then be introduced into cells to enable gene expression or gene silencing studies.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, France, Spain, Australia, China, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, Japan, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Malaysia, Brazil, Hungary, Chile, Belgium, Denmark, Macao, Mexico, Sweden, Indonesia, Romania, Czechia, Egypt, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Greece, Panama, Kenya, Finland, Israel, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Norway
Hydrochloric acid is a commonly used laboratory reagent. It is a clear, colorless, and highly corrosive liquid with a pungent odor. Hydrochloric acid is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride gas.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, Japan, Canada, France, Switzerland, Italy, Australia, Belgium, Spain, Denmark, Ireland, Netherlands, Holy See (Vatican City State), Israel
Opti-MEM is a cell culture medium designed to support the growth and maintenance of a variety of cell lines. It is a serum-reduced formulation that helps to reduce the amount of serum required for cell culture, while still providing the necessary nutrients and growth factors for cell proliferation.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, New Zealand, Spain, Denmark, Israel, Macao, Ireland, Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Holy See (Vatican City State), Sweden, Brazil, Argentina, India, Poland, Morocco, Czechia
DMEM/F12 is a cell culture medium developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is a balanced salt solution that provides nutrients and growth factors essential for the cultivation of a variety of cell types, including adherent and suspension cells. The medium is formulated to support the proliferation and maintenance of cells in vitro.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada, Japan, Italy, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Singapore, Uruguay, Australia, Spain, Poland, India, Austria, Denmark, Netherlands, Jersey, Finland, Sweden
The FACSCalibur is a flow cytometry system designed for multi-parameter analysis of cells and other particles. It features a blue (488 nm) and a red (635 nm) laser for excitation of fluorescent dyes. The instrument is capable of detecting forward scatter, side scatter, and up to four fluorescent parameters simultaneously.
Sourced in Canada
The 60Co gamma irradiator is a piece of laboratory equipment used for the irradiation of samples. It utilizes the radioactive isotope cobalt-60 as the source of gamma radiation. The core function of the 60Co gamma irradiator is to provide a controlled and uniform exposure of materials to ionizing radiation.

More about "Nuclear Energy"

Nuclear power is a form of energy generation that harnesses the power of atomic nuclei.
This process involves the controlled splitting or fusion of atomic nuclei, releasing large amounts of energy.
Nuclear energy is a reliable, efficient, and clean source of electricity, but it also comes with risks and challenges related to radioactive waste management, safety, and public perception.
Researchers in this field work to optimize nuclear reactor designs, enhance safety protocols, and develop innovative nuclear fuel technologies to address these concerns and promote the wider adoption of nuclear power as a sustainable energy solution.
Some key subtopics in nuclear energy research include reactor design, fuel cycle management, radiation protection, and waste disposal.
Nuclear energy can be leveraged alongside other clean energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, to create a diversified and resilient energy portfolio.
Technoglogies like Materials Studio and IR-79 are used to model and simulate nuclear processes, while tools like DMEM, Lipofectamine 2000, and FACSCalibur are employed in related biological and materials research.
Despite the challenges, nuclear energy remains an important component of the global effort to transition to a low-carbon, sustainable energy future.
With continued innovation and responsible development, nuclear power can play a key role in powering our world while minimizing environmental impact.