Odors
They are produced by a variety of natural and synthetic sources, including plants, animals, and industrial processes.
Odors play a crucial role in human and animal behavior, including food selection, social interactions, and environmental awareness.
The study of odors is an important field of research in areas such as neuroscience, psychology, and environmental science.
Researchers utilize various methods and tools to analyze and characterize odors, including sensory evaluation, chemical analysis, and computational modeling.
Understanding the nature and impact of odors is essential for applications ranging from fragrance and flavor development to environmental monitoring and public health.
Most cited protocols related to «Odors»
Odors were delivered using felt-tip pens (“Sniffin’ Sticks”) of approximately 14 cm length and an inner diameter of 1.3 cm. These pens carry a tampon soaked with 4 ml of liquid odorant. For odor presentation, the cap was removed from the pen for approximately 3 s, the pen’s tip brought in front of the subject’s nose and carefully moved from left to right nostril and backwards [3 (link)].
The threshold was obtained in a three alternative forced choice paradigm (3 AFC) where subjects were repeatedly presented with triplets of pens and had to discriminate one pen containing an odorous solution from two blanks filled with the solvent. Phenylethanol (dissolved in propylene glycol) or n-butanol (dissolved in water) were used, with both odorants having been found equivalent in olfactory sensitivity testing: scores obtained with both are correlated [17 (link)]. The highest concentration was a 4% odor solution. Sixteen concentrations were created by stepwise diluting previous ones by 1:2. Starting with the lowest odor concentration, a staircase paradigm was used where two subsequent correct identifications of the odorous pen or one incorrect answer marked a so-called turning point, and resulted in a decrease or increase, respectively, of concentration in the next triplet. Triplets were presented at 20 s intervals. The threshold score was the mean of the last four turning points in the staircase, with the final score ranging between 1 and 16 points.
The discrimination task used the same 3 AFC logic. Two pens of any triplet contained the same odorant, while the third pen smelled differently. Subjects were asked to indicate the single pen with a different smell. Within-triplet intervals were approximately 3 s. As the odors used in this subtest were more intense, between-triplets intervals were 20–30 s. The score was the sum of correctly identified odors. Hence, the scores in this task ranged from 0 to 16 points. Importantly, subjects were blindfolded for the threshold and discrimination tasks to avoid visual identification of target pens.
Odor identification comprised common and familiar odorants (recognized by at least 75% of the population). Subjects were presented with single pens and asked to identify and label the smell, using four alternative descriptors for each pen. Between-pen intervals were approximately 20–30 s. The total score was the sum of correctly identified pens, thus subjects could score between 0 and 16 points.
The final “TDI score” was the sum of scores for Threshold, Discrimination and Identification subtests, with a range between 1 and 48 points.
Most recents protocols related to «Odors»
EXAMPLE 1
A mixer, equipped with an electric mixer that has three prop-style mixing blades in series on a central shaft is used to produce a composition in accordance with the present disclosure. The tank itself is a stainless-steel cone-bottom tank with a 33 degree slope with a set of four baffles to allow for turbulent laminar flow.
36% w/w of dimethyl sulfoxide and 15% w/w of styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer are added to the tank, heated to 160° F., and mixed for one hour or until dissolved. 17% dicyandiamide is then added, and mixing continued for another hour or until dissolved. 15% monoethanolamine (MEA) is added with stirring and the resulting solution is allowed to cool to 100° F. Once cooled, 17% N-(N-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) is added with mixing for 45 minutes or until dissolved. The resulting solution is passed through a 5 micron filter, and samples are taken from both the top and the bottom of the reactor for testing. The resulting solution is reddish-orange and has a sulfur-like odor.
EXAMPLE 3
A mixer, equipped with an electric mixer that has three prop-style mixing blades in series on a central shaft is used to produce a composition in accordance with the present disclosure. The tank itself is a stainless-steel cone-bottom tank with a 33 degree slope with a set of four baffles to allow for turbulent laminar flow.
30.99% w/w of dimethyl sulfoxide and 20% w/w of styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer are added to the tank, heated to 160° F., and mixed for one hour or until dissolved. 0.01% FD&C Blue #1, 17% dicyandiamide, and 15% monoethanolamine (MEA) are then added, and mixing continued for another hour or until dissolved. The resulting solution is allowed to cool to 100° F., and then 17% N-(N-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) is added with mixing for 45 minutes or until dissolved. The resulting solution is passed through a 5 micron filter, and samples are taken from both the top and the bottom of the reactor for testing. The resulting solution is blue and has a sulfur-like odor.
Example 4
The patient received an artificial heart (LVAD) in 2013. From fall 2015, he was initially in outpatient treatment for driveline infection. The first documented driveline treatment with ActiMaris took Place®. A few months later, inpatient admission was required for operative remediation of the infection. The finding was so pronounced that odor of the Pseudomonas infestation could be detected before the patient entered through the door. The degree of infection is shown in
It should be noted that treatment with ActiMaris Alone® was unsuccessful for more than six months, so that the infection progressed significantly with an increase in the infection parameters. After three weeks of combination therapy, the improvement in findings shown above could be achieved with normalization of the infection values.
EXAMPLE 2
A mixer, equipped with an electric mixer that has three prop-style mixing blades in series on a central shaft is used to produce a composition in accordance with the present disclosure. The tank itself is a stainless-steel cone-bottom tank with a 33 degree slope with a set of four baffles to allow for turbulent laminar flow.
40.99% w/w of dimethyl sulfoxide and 10% w/w of styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer are added to the tank, heated to 160° F., and mixed for one hour or until dissolved. 0.01% FD&C Blue #1, 17% dicyandiamide, and 15% monoethanolamine (MEA) are then added, and mixing continued for another hour or until dissolved. The resulting solution is allowed to cool to 100° F. and then, 17% N-(N-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) is added with mixing for 45 minutes or until dissolved. The resulting solution is passed through a 5 micron filter, and samples are taken from both the top and the bottom of the reactor for testing. The resulting solution is blue and has a sulfur-like odor.
Morris water maze (MWM)
Hippocampal spatial memory and learning memory were assessed by the Morris Water Maze (MWM) test, which was performed as previously reported [39 (link)]. Acquired data was analyzed using SMART V3.0 (Panlab Harvard Apparatus, Germany) video tracking system. 13 animals per group were utilized.
Novel object recognition test (NORT)
All spaces were properly cleaned with 96% ethanol between animals, in order to eliminate odor or other cues. Data was measured and represented in seconds.