> Phenomena > Natural Phenomenon or Process > Osmotic Pressure

← Osmosis

Osmotic Pressure

Osmotic Pressure refers to the pressure exerted by the movement of solvent molecules across a semipermeable membrane, from a region of lower solute concentration to a region of higher solute concentration.
This pressure differential is an important factor in various biological processes, such as cell volume regulation, water balance, and nutrient transport.
Understanding and optimizing osmotic pressure experiments is crucial for researchers studying these fundamental physiological mechanisms.
PubCompare.ai leverages AI-driven protocol comparison to enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of osmotic pressure research, helping scientists easily locate the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, while identifying the most suitable products to streamline their research process and elevate their scientific discoveries.

Most cited protocols related to «Osmotic Pressure»

Improved Salt Bridge Interactions in CHARMM36

Another refinement in the C36m FF concerns improved description of salt bridge interactions involving guanidinium and carboxylate functional groups with a pair-specific non-bonded LJ parameter (NBFIX term in CHARMM) between the guanidinium nitrogen in arginine and the carboxylate oxygen in glutamate, aspartate as well as the C terminus. This salt bridge interaction was found to be too favorable in the CHARMM protein force fields as indicated by the overestimation of the equilibrium association constant of a guanidinium-acetate solution ,^{33 , 34} as well as the underestimation of its osmotic pressure (personal communication, Benoit Roux). The added NBFIX term increases the R_min from the 3.55 Å based on the Lorentz-Berthelot rule to a larger value of 3.637 Å (Shen and Roux, personal communication), which we subsequently showed to improve the agreement with the experimental osmotic pressure of guanidinium acetate solutions (Supplementary Figure 19). We noted that the NBFIX approach employed here differs from Piana et al’s work²⁷ where the CHARMM22 charges of the Arg, Asp and Glu side chains were reduced in magnitude, with both approaches leading to weaker and more realistic salt-bridge interactions. The NBFIX term makes sure only the specific interaction between Arg and Asp/Glu is modified, while the interaction of these residues with other amino acids, water, or ions are kept the same as in the C36 FF. Again, our aim is to improve the C36 FF with minimal changes in the model.

Huang J., Rauscher S., Nawrocki G., Ran T., Feig M., de Groot B.L., Grubmüller H, & MacKerell AD J.r. (2016). CHARMM36m: An Improved Force Field for Folded and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Nature methods, 14(1), 71-73.

Publication 2016

Acetate Amino Acids Arginine Aspartate aspartylglutamate Glutamate Guanidine Ions Nitrogen Osmotic Pressure Oxygen Proteins Sodium Chloride

Determining Effective Lipid Bilayer Charge

This new method was developed to determine the effective charge Q_eff of a lipid bilayer by simulating its response to an applied electric field E. Specifically, the bilayer (or any large or small molecular assembly) is constrained in a harmonic potential with force constant k, and the average displacement

\bar{Δ d}

along the direction of the field is evaluated. The force on the bilayer from the field is Q_eff E. This is balanced by the force from the constraint,

k \bar{Δ d}

, leading to
Q_eff can be evaluated from simulations with a single field or from the slope of

\bar{Δ d}

vs. E.
For purposes of parameter development, the effective charge method complements the osmotic pressure method: (1) it can be applied directly to bilayers; (2) it can be applied to interactions with uncharged functional groups, such as carboxylate esters. The osmotic pressure approach, in contrast, is applicable to small molecules. While it can be applied to uncharged species, the osmotic pressure dependence on ionic concentration is too small to be a useful target for the present parameter development.
An existing 72 POPC lipid bilayer⁷ with ca. 31 waters/lipid was expanded along z by adding water to reach 120 waters/lipid. To obtain a 0.1 M NaCl solution, 16 Na⁺ and 16 Cl⁻ ions were added via random water replacement, as described below for the POPS bilayer. The simulation method is the same as for osmotic pressure calculation. After equilibration to a converged volume, four simulations were run in the NVT ensemble, each with an external electric field E = 0.4 kcal/mol Å⁻¹e⁻¹ applied in one of the x, −x, y, or −y directions, with a harmonic restraint k= 1.0 kcal/mol Å⁻² applied on the bilayer center of mass. As noted in the Introduction, the strategy here is based on the results of electrophoresis experiments, where vesicles of POPC do not migrate in an applied electric field, indicating that their net charge is very close to zero. The R^ij_min values for sodium paired with O atoms in ester C=O and P=O functional groups were therefore adjusted iteratively to minimize the effective charge.

Venable R.M., Luo Y., Gawrisch K., Roux B, & Pastor R.W. (2013). Simulations of Anionic Lipid Membranes: Development of Interaction-Specific Ion Parameters and Validation using NMR Data. The journal of physical chemistry. B, 117(35), 10.1021/jp401512z.

Publication 2013

1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine Complement System Proteins Electricity Electrophoresis Ester C Esters Ions Lipid A Lipid Bilayers Lipids Osmotic Pressure Sodium Sodium Chloride

Comprehensive Mucus Characterization Methods

Mucus samples were prepared as previously described [19 (link), 20 (link)], with buffer capacity measurements performed as described by Holma [21 (link), 22 (link)] and Kim [23 ]. Spontaneous sputum samples were collected as detailed previously [11 (link), 24 ]. Detailed methods for the pooling of sputum samples are given in the supplemental materials. Mucus nanorheology was performed with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays [24 ], microrheology assays were performed with particle tracking microrheology of 1μm diameter COOH modified beads [8 (link)], and cone and plate macroscopic rheology was performed as previously described [7 , 25 (link)], ensuring that measurements we taking in the linear viscoelastic regime (See supplemental material). Osmotic pressure, PCL height, and mucociliary transport measurements were performed as previously described [1 (link), 26 (link)]. Mucus harvested from human bronchial epithelial cell cultures are considered non-human subject protocol #03-1396. Sputum samples were collected under IRB #15-2431. See supplemental material for detailed methods.

Hill D.B., Long R.F., Kissner W.J., Atieh E., Garbarine I.C., Markovetz M.R., Fontana N.C., Christy M., Habibpour M., Tarran R., Forest M.G., Boucher R.C, & Button B. (2018). Pathological Mucus and Impaired Mucus Clearance in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Results from Increased Concentration, not altered pH. The European respiratory journal, 52(6), 1801297.

Publication 2018

Biological Assay Bronchi Buffers Epithelial Cells Homo sapiens Mucociliary Clearance Mucus Osmotic Pressure Retinal Cone Sputum

Constraint-Based Metabolic Modeling

All biological processes are subjected to physico chemical constraints (such as mass balance, osmotic pressure, electro neutrality, thermodynamic, and other constraints). As a result of decades of metabolic research and the recent genome sequencing projects, the mass balance constraints on cellular metabolism can be assigned on a genome scale for a number of organisms. Methods have been developed to analyze the metabolic capabilities of a cellular system based on the mass balance constraints and this approach is known as flux balance analysis (FBA) [13 (link), 14 , 16 ] (see the supplementary information for an FBA primer). The mass balance constraints in a metabolic network can be represented mathematically by a matrix equation:
S • v = 0 Equation 1
The matrix S is the mxn stoichiometric matrix, where m is the number of metabolites and n is the number of reactions in the network (The E. coli stoichiometric matrix is available in matrix format in the supplementary information and in a reaction list in Appendices 1-3). The vector v represents all fluxes in the metabolic network, including the internal fluxes, transport fluxes and the growth flux.
For the E. coli metabolic network represented by Eqn. 1, the number of fluxes was greater than the number of mass balance constraints; thus, there were multiple feasible flux distributions that satisfied the mass balance constraints, and the solutions (or feasible metabolic flux distributions) were confined to the nullspace of the matrix S.
In addition to the mass balance constraints, we imposed constraints on the magnitude of individual metabolic fluxes.
α_i ≤ v_i ≤ β_i Equation 2
The linear inequality constraints were used to enforce the reversibility of each metabolic reaction and the maximal flux in the transport reactions. The reversibility constraints for each reaction are indicated online. The transport flux for inorganic phosphate, ammonia, carbon dioxide, sulfate, potassium, and sodium was unrestrained (α_i = -∞ and β_i = ∞). The transport flux for the other metabolites, when available in the in silico medium, was constrained between zero and the maximal level (0 ≤ v_i ≤ v_i^max). The v_i^max values used in the simulations are noted for each simulation (Fig. 1). When a metabolite was not available in the medium, the transport flux was constrained to zero. The transport flux for metabolites capable of leaving the metabolic network (i.e. acetate, ethanol, lactate, succinate, formate, and pyruvate) was always unconstrained in the net outward direction.
The intersection of the nullspace and the region defined by the linear inequalities defined a region in flux space that we will refer to as the feasible set, and the feasible set defined the capabilities of the metabolic network subject to the imposed cellular constraints. It should be noted that every vector v within the feasible set is not reachable by the cell under a given condition due to other constraints not considered in the analysis (i.e. maximal internal fluxes and gene regulation). The feasible set can be further reduced by imposing additional constraints (i.e. kinetic or gene regulatory constraints), and in the limiting condition where all constraints are known, the feasible set may reduce to a single point.
A particular metabolic flux distribution within the feasible set (vector v which satisfies the constraints in Eqns. 1 and 2) was found using linear programming (LP). A commercially available LP package was used (LINDO, Lindo Systems Inc., Chicago, II). LP identified a solution that minimized a metabolic objective function (subject to the imposed constraints- Eqns. 1 and 2) [16 , 48 (link), 49 (link)], and was formulated as shown below:
Minimize -Z
where Z = Σ c_i v_i = Equation 3
The vector c was used to select a linear combination of metabolic fluxes to include in the objective function [50 (link)]. Herein, c was defined as the unit vector in the direction of the growth flux, and the growth flux was defined in terms of the biosynthetic requirements:
(Equation 4)
where d_m is the biomass composition of metabolite X_m (we used a constant biomass composition defined from the literature [51 ] (see Appendix 4)), and the growth flux was modeled as a single reaction that converts all the biosynthetic precursors into biomass.

Edwards J.S, & Palsson B.O. (2000). Metabolic flux balance analysis and the in silico analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 gene deletions. BMC Bioinformatics, 1, 1.

Publication 2000

Acetate Ammonia Anabolism Biological Processes Carbon dioxide Cells Cloning Vectors Escherichia coli Ethanol formate Gene Expression Regulation Genome Kinetics Lactates Metabolic Networks Metabolism Oligonucleotide Primers Osmotic Pressure Phosphates Potassium Pyruvate Sodium Succinate Sulfates, Inorganic

Leaf Patch Pressure Attenuation Analysis

The input pressure, P_in, experienced by the cells in a leaf patch is equal to the clamp pressure, P_clamp, only if the pressure signal is transferred lossless to the cells in the leaves. However, losses usually occur due to the compressibility and the deformability of the silicone of the pressure sensor as well as of the compressibility of the cuticle and other structural elements of the leaf. Therefore, theory shows that only a fraction of P_clamp may arrive at the cells, i.e. that the attenuation factor, F_a=P_in/P_clamp, is smaller than unity. F_a depends on the individual leaf properties. F_a can be assumed to be constant (and leaf thickness changes are negligible) if the structural elements are completely pre-compressed by application of an appropriate P_clamp. If P_clamp is kept constant during the following experimental period, P_in is constant and the output pressure, P_p, is only determined by the cell transfer function, T_f(V), where V is the leaf patch volume. In other words, T_f(V) determines the fraction of P_in sensed by the probe. It is dimensionless and assumes values between zero and unity: T_f depends on the volume of the leaf patch, V, at constant ambient temperature, T: δV depends on changes in cell turgor pressure, δP_c, as follows: where o_p is the average volumetric elastic modulus of the clamped tissue (Philip, 1958 (link)). o_p is a very complex parameter and will be dictated by the turgor pressure in the turgescent state. For a first approximation it is assumed that o_p increases linearly with P_c (support for this assumption is given by Zimmermann and Steudle, 1978 ; Zimmermann and Hüsken, 1980 ; Wendler et al., 1983 ): where a and b are constants for individual leaf properties. Because of the viscoelastic properties of the cell wall, the magnitude of the constants depends on the duration of the external pressure application (Zimmermann and Hüsken, 1980 ). The constants are relatively large if rapid turgor pressure changes are induced (e.g. by using the cell turgor pressure probe), whereas slow turgor pressure changes (e.g. under transpirational conditions) result in small values.
Combining equations 2–4 leads to equation 5.
Equation 5 can be integrated by assuming for a first approximation that at P_c=0 T_f=1 and that the internal osmotic pressure of the cells remained constant. After appropriate re-arrangements equation 6 is obtained: and, respectively, if the denominator is replaced by equation 4:
Introducing equation 6 into equation 1 yields the wanted relationship between the parameters P_p and P_in:
Equation 8 can be verified experimentally. Inspection of the equation shows that the patch clamp pressure, P_p, is a power function of the turgor pressure, P_c. The exponent of the function is equal to or smaller than unity. If a=1 and b <<P_c, equation 8 turns into P_p=b/P_c, i.e. both parameters are directly reciprocally coupled with each other. Thus T_f assumes low values if P_c is high and, vice versa, a value close to unity if P_c is close to zero. Using appropriate values for a and b for a given leaf (see below) it can be shown that below P_c=100 kPa, P_p increases dramatically. This means that the transfer function responds very sensitively upon loss of complete turgor pressure.
In the derivation of equation 8 it was assumed that o_p is temperature-independent. However, temperature effects on cell elasticity are well-known, although they are not very large in the temperature range investigated here (see, for example, Petersen et al., 1982 ; Niklas, 1992 ; Hogan and Niklas, 2004 ; Edelmann et al., 2005 ). Temperature effects on o_p cannot be excluded if different values for the P_clamp, and, in turn, for the input pressure, P_in, are selected, as well as if significantly different values for the constants a and b are assumed for optimum fitting of the P_p=f(P_c) curves. Therefore, in the case of large temperature gradients as observed here (see Figs 2 and 3) only the relative, but not the absolute changes in P_p measured at the different heights can be compared with each other. However, P_p values measured at the same height are still comparable and give information about the turgescence, i.e. about the water status of the leaf cells.

Zimmermann D., Reuss R., Westhoff M., Geßner P., Bauer W., Bamberg E., Bentrup F.W, & Zimmermann U. (2008). A novel, non-invasive, online-monitoring, versatile and easy plant-based probe for measuring leaf water status. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59(11), 3157-3167.

Publication 2008

Cells Cell Wall Elasticity Elastic Tissue Figs Osmotic Pressure Physiology, Cell Plant Leaves Pressure Silicones

Most recents protocols related to «Osmotic Pressure»

Characterization of Pegylated Cysteinyl-succinyl Hemoglobin

Not available on PMC !

Example 10

The specifications of the pegylated cysteinyl-succinyl crosslinked hemoglobin used for the below safety, pharmacokinetics and tissue oxygenation studies, are shown in Table 12.

TABLE 12

Physical Properties of Cysteinyl-succinyl Crosslinked

Hemoglobin Conjugate.

Pegylated Cysteinyl-

succinyl Crosslinked

tHb [g/dL]4.5-5.5

pH7.4-8.4

MetHb [%]≤8%

Endotoxin [EU/mL]≤0.25

Colloid Osmotic Pressure [mmHg]>73

Estimated PEG no./Hb12-14

Estimated MW [kDa]125-135

Average Hydrodynamic Size [nm]13.5-14.5

Free Dimer [%]0

Unpegylated Hemoglobin≤5%

Residual PEG [mg/mL]≤0.2

US11857605B2. Thiosuccinyl-crosslinked hemoglobin conjugates and methods of use and preparation thereof (2024-01-02). Billion King International Limited [CN]. Inventors: Kwok Chu Butt [CN], Norman Fung-Man Wai [CA], Hiu Chi Chong [CN], Wing Tat Choi [CN], Colin Pak Fai Yeh [CN], Benjamin Chi Yin Wai [CA].

Full text: Click here

Patent 2024

4-methyl-5-ethoxalyl-1H-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,5-benzodiazepin-2-one Cell Respiration Colloids Drug Kinetics Endotoxins Hemoglobin Hydrodynamics Osmotic Pressure Physical Processes Safety Tissues

Heat-Treated MCF-7 Cell Permeabilization

MCF-7 cells (ATCC cat. no. HB-7) were cultured under the standard protocol reported in our previous studies [32 (link)]. The trypsinized MCF-7 cells were resuspended to a low conductive buffer (BTXPRESS Low Conductivity Medium T, BTX, USA). The low conductive buffer is biocompatible as it maintains the osmotic pressure at ∼270 mOsm/L, and is nontoxic according to the manufacturer's datasheet. The permeabilized MCF-7 cells were heat-treated at 60 C for 10 min, and then fixed with 4% formaldehyde. After permeabilization, MCF-7 cells were stained with trypan blue for 5 min and washed with the low conductive buffer three times.

Zhong J., Liang M., Tang Q, & Ai Y. (2023). Selectable encapsulated cell quantity in droplets via label-free electrical screening and impedance-activated sorting. Materials Today Bio, 19, 100594.

Full text: Click here

Publication 2023

Buffers Electric Conductivity Formaldehyde MCF-7 Cells Osmotic Pressure Trypan Blue

Measuring Osmolality of Artificial Seawater

The osmolality of the ASWs at different concentrations was estimated with the osmometer (VAPRO Vapor Pressure Osmometer 5600; ELITechGroup). The measurements were done at least twice for each salt concentration and the average values for the 50% ASW, ASW, and 120% ASW were, respectively, 452, 866, and 1,076 mOsm/kg, corresponding to osmotic pressure drops of −1,02 MPa and +0.52 MPa respectively.

Najafi J., Dmitrieff S, & Minc N. (2023). Size- and position-dependent cytoplasm viscoelasticity through hydrodynamic interactions with the cell surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(9), e2216839120.

Publication 2023

Osmotic Pressure Sodium Chloride, Dietary Vapor Pressure

Computational Model of Brain Fluid and Solute Transfer

The transfer functions in System (3) model the exchange of fluid, r_j, and solutes, s_j, between the different compartments. These compartments are either separated by a membrane or directly connected to vessels along the same tree (e.g. an artery branching to capillaries or the PVS around arteries branching to the PVS around capillaries. We assume the possibility of PVS around capillaries in line with e.g. [36 (link)]).
When the compartments are separated by a membrane, the fluid flows from one compartment to another due to a difference in pressure which is related to the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane, i.e.

\begin{matrix} r_{j} = \frac{1}{ϕ_{j}} \sum_{i \in J, i \neq j} γ_{j, i} [(p_{i} - p_{j}) - σ_{i, j} (π_{i} - π_{j})], \end{matrix}

with

\begin{matrix} γ_{j, i} = L_{i, j} \frac{|S_{i, j}|}{|Ω|}, \end{matrix}

where |Ω| = ∫_Ω 1 dx = 2313 mm³ is the brain volume (computed from our rat brain mesh), L_i,j is the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane separating the i−th and j−th compartments,

\frac{|S_{i, j}|}{|Ω|}

is the ratio between the surface of the membrane and the total volume of the tissue, and σ_i,j is the osmotic reflection coefficient for the membrane. This reflection coefficient corresponds to a specific solute. In this work, we only consider osmotic effects due to plasma cells in the blood where π_j is the osmotic pressure. The solute crosses the membrane due to the combination of two effects: Either via convection of fluid through the pores of the membrane or via diffusion. These two effects are modelled by the transfer functions (see e.g. [37 ])

\begin{matrix} s_{j} = \frac{1}{ϕ_{j}} \sum_{i \in J, i \neq j} λ_{j, i} (c_{i} - c_{j}) + \frac{(c_{j} + c_{i})}{2} {\tilde{γ}}_{j, i} (p_{i} - p_{j} - σ_{i, j} (π_{i} - π_{j})), \end{matrix}

where this time

\begin{matrix} λ_{j, i} = P_{i, j} \frac{|S_{i, j}|}{|Ω|}, {\tilde{γ}}_{j, i} = γ_{j, i} (1 - σ_{reflect}), \end{matrix}

in which P_i,j is the permeability of the membrane separating the i−th and j−th compartments to the solute and σ_reflect reflects the solvent-drag reflection coefficient.
In the case of a continuous transition between compartments, such as between arteries and capillaries, no membrane is present and we set P_i,j = 0. Values for the exchange coefficients

γ_{j, i}, {\tilde{γ}}_{j, i}

and λ_j,i are given in Subsection 2.3.

Poulain A., Riseth J, & Vinje V. (2023). Multi-compartmental model of glymphatic clearance of solutes in brain tissue. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0280501.

Full text: Click here

Publication 2023

Arteries BLOOD Blood Vessel Brain Capillaries Cell Membrane Permeability Convection Diffusion Electric Conductivity Osmosis Osmotic Pressure Plasma Cells Pressure Reflex Solvents Tissue, Membrane Tissues Trees

Preparation of MT-BHC Microparticles and Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

Based on our previous studies (Tian et al., 2018 ), MT-BHC MPs were prepared by the emulsion–solvent evaporation method. Briefly, 200 mg of EUD RS PO, 200 mg of EUD RL PO, 50 mg of BHC, and 30 mg of MT-BHC were completely dissolved in an acetonitrile solution containing 80 mg of triethyl citrate, 80 mg of glycerol, and 124 mg of Tween 80 (O₁ phase). The O₁ phase was emulsified by slowly dropping into the O₂ phase consisting of 248 mg of spirulina 80 and 10 mL of liquid paraffin and mixed rapidly with a stirrer (XW-80A, Haimen Kylin-Bell Lab Instruments Co., Ltd.), then sonicated (JY 92-II, Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Ltd. China) for 15 min in an ice bath with a ultrasonic power of 53% at 5-s intervals and stirred at 800 rpm for 1 h in the ice bath and later at RT for 0.5 h, followed by adjusting the speed to 650 rpm until a clear mixture was obtained. The resulting MPs were washed with n-hexane to remove any excess oil content on the surface, recovered by centrifugal filtration, and air-dried at room temperature. The MT-BHC MPs eye drops were prepared by dispersing the MPs powder in a sarcosine phosphate buffer containing a co-suspension agent and adding 3.1% mannitol (mass/vol) and 0.1% (mass/vol) Tween 80 to adjust the osmotic pressure and viscosity.
MT-BHC SLNs were prepared by the melt-emulsion sonication and low temperature-solidification method in line with our previous research (Liu S et al., 2020 (link); Han et al., 2021 (link)). Briefly, the organic phase was composed of 30 mg of BHC, 30 mg of GMS, and 100 mg of SPL dissolved in 5 mL of ethanol under heating at 75 °C. The water phase was a mixture of 200 mg of Tween 80, 100 mg of PEG-400, and 5 mg of sodium deoxycholate. First, 5 mg of MT-BHC complex was added to the organic phase and then ice bath ultrasonication for 10 min, injected into the aqueous phase at 75 °C under stirring at 800 rpm. Next, the stirring speed was increased to 1000 rpm and the mixture was stirred until an initial emulsion was formed. To maintain the stable morphology of SLNs, the initial emulsion was quickly injected into a 3.6% (wt/vol) aqueous mannitol solution at 0 °C and stirred for 2 h. The obtained SLNs were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the two preparation methods.

Li H., Dai F., Liu H., Tao Q., Hu J., Zhang Y., Xiao Z., Rupenthal I.D., Li H., Yang F., Li W., Lin H, & Hou D. (2023). Physicochemical properties and micro-interaction between micro-nanoparticles and anterior corneal multilayer biological interface film for improving drug delivery efficacy: the transformation of tear film turnover mode. Drug Delivery, 30(1), 2184312.

Full text: Click here

Publication 2023

acetonitrile Bath Buffers Cold Temperature Deoxycholic Acid, Monosodium Salt Emulsions Ethanol Eye Drops Filtration Glycerin magnesium citrate Mannitol n-hexane Oil, Mineral Osmotic Pressure Phosphates polyethylene glycol 400 Powder Sarcosine Solvents Tween 80 Ultrasonics Viscosity

Top products related to «Osmotic Pressure»

Fetal bovine serum (fbs) by Thermo Fisher Scientific

Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal

Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.

Dulbecco modified eagle medium (dmem) by Thermo Fisher Scientific

Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Canada, Japan, Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Israel, New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark, India, Poland, Sweden, Argentina, Netherlands, Brazil, Macao, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Cameroon, Hong Kong, Portugal, Morocco, Hungary, Finland, Puerto Rico, Holy See (Vatican City State), Gabon, Bulgaria, Norway, Jamaica

DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium) is a cell culture medium formulated to support the growth and maintenance of a variety of cell types, including mammalian cells. It provides essential nutrients, amino acids, vitamins, and other components necessary for cell proliferation and survival in an in vitro environment.

Osmomat 030 by Gonotec

Sourced in Germany

The Osmomat 030 is a laboratory instrument designed for the precise measurement of osmotic pressure. It operates using the freezing point depression principle to determine the osmotic concentration of a liquid sample.

Au5800 by Beckman Coulter

Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Canada

The AU5800 is a chemistry analyzer designed for high-throughput clinical laboratory testing. It features advanced optics and automation to provide reliable and efficient sample processing. The core function of the AU5800 is to perform a variety of clinical chemistry tests, including immunoassays, on patient samples.

D glucose by Merck Group

Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Australia, France, Italy, Canada, Sao Tome and Principe, Japan, Macao, Israel, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, India, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand, Brazil, Singapore, Netherlands

D-glucose is a type of monosaccharide, a simple sugar that serves as the primary source of energy for many organisms. It is a colorless, crystalline solid that is soluble in water and other polar solvents. D-glucose is a naturally occurring compound and is a key component of various biological processes.

D mannitol by Merck Group

Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Spain, Italy, Japan, France

D-mannitol is a type of sugar alcohol commonly used in the production of pharmaceutical and laboratory equipment. It serves as a bulking agent, sweetener, and excipient in various formulations. D-mannitol is a white, crystalline powder with a sweet taste and is soluble in water. It is widely utilized in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries as a component in drug tablets, capsules, and other medicinal products.

Osmomat 050 by Gonotec

Sourced in Germany

The Osmomat 050 is a laboratory instrument designed to measure the osmolality of liquid samples. It utilizes the freezing point depression method to determine the osmotic concentration of the sample. The Osmomat 050 is capable of accurately measuring the osmolality of a wide range of sample types, including biological fluids, aqueous solutions, and other liquids.

Peg 400 by Tokyo Chemical Industry

PEG 400 is a polyethylene glycol with an average molecular weight of 400 g/mol. It is a clear, viscous liquid that is miscible with water and many organic solvents. PEG 400 is commonly used as a solvent, humectant, and plasticizer in various industries.

Penicillin streptomycin by Thermo Fisher Scientific

Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada, France, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Gabon, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Brazil, Macao, India, Singapore, Poland, Argentina, Cameroon, Uruguay, Morocco, Panama, Colombia, Holy See (Vatican City State), Hungary, Norway, Portugal, Mexico, Thailand, Palestine, State of, Finland, Moldova, Republic of, Jamaica, Czechia

Penicillin/streptomycin is a commonly used antibiotic solution for cell culture applications. It contains a combination of penicillin and streptomycin, which are broad-spectrum antibiotics that inhibit the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Vapro 5600 by Wescor

Sourced in United States

The Vapro 5600 is a vapor pressure osmometer designed to measure the osmolality of aqueous solutions. It utilizes the dew-point method to determine the osmotic pressure of samples.

What is Osmotic Pressure and why is it important?

Osmotic pressure refers to the pressure exerted by the movement of solvent molecules, typically water, across a semipermeable membrane. This pressure differential is a crucial factor in various biological processes, such as cell volume regulation, water balance, and nutrient transport. Understanding and optimizing osmotic pressure is crucial for researchers studying these fundamental physiological mechanisms, as it helps ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of their experiments.

What are some common challenges in measuring Osmotic Pressure?

Measuring osmotic pressure can be challenging due to factors like temperature fluctuations, membrane integrity, and solute concentration gradients. Ensuring consistent experimental conditions and using the right equipment and protocols are essential to obtain accurate and reliable results. Improperly calibrated instruments or inadequate sample preparation can lead to erroneous osmotic pressure measurements.

How can different types of Osmotic Pressure experiments be used?

Osmotic pressure experiments can be used to study a variety of biological and chemical systems. For example, measuring the osmotic pressure of cells can provide insights into their volume regulation and water balance mechanisms. In the pharmaceutical industry, osmotic pressure measurements are used to optimize drug formulations and delivery systems. Researchers may also use osmotic pressure to characterize the permeability of membranes or the interactions between solutes and solvents.

How can PubCompare.ai assist with Osmotic Pressure research?

PubCompare.ai allows researchers to screen protocol literature more efficiently and leverage AI to pinpoint critical insights. The platform's AI-driven analysis can help identify the most effective protocols related to Osmotic Pressure for your specific research goals. By highlighting key differences in protocol effectiveness, PubCompare.ai enables you to choose the best option for reproducibility and accuracy, streamlining your research process and elevating your scientific discoveries.

Are there any common typos or mistakes to watch out for in Osmotic Pressure experiments?

One common mistake in Osmotic Pressure experiments is the misrading of instrument calibrations or improer sample preparation. Ensuring that all equipment is properly calibrated and that samples are prepared according to the protocol is crucial to obtaining accurate results. Additionally, researchers should be mindful of environmental factors like temperature and humidity, as these can impact osmotic pressure measurements if not carefully controlled.

More about "Osmotic Pressure"

Osmotic pressure, also known as osmotic force or osmotic tension, refers to the pressure exerted by the movement of solvent molecules, typically water, across a semipermeable membrane.
This pressure differential is a crucial factor in various biological processes, such as cell volume regulation, water balance, and nutrient transport.
Understanding and optimizing osmotic pressure experiments is essential for researchers studying these fundamental physiological mechanisms.
Researchers often utilize different solutions and materials in their osmotic pressure experiments, including Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), D-glucose, D-mannitol, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 400, and Penicillin/Streptomycin.
These components play vital roles in maintaining the osmotic environment and ensuring the accuracy of the experiments.
Specialized equipment, such as the Osmomat 030, Osmomat 050, AU5800, and Vapro 5600, are commonly used to measure and analyze osmotic pressure in various biological samples.
These instruments provide researchers with precise data, allowing them to understand the underlying mechanisms and optimize their experimental protocols.
PubCompare.ai, an AI-driven platform, can enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of osmotic pressure research by facilitating the comparison of experimental protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
This tool helps scientists easily identify the best protocols and the most suitable products, streamlining their research process and elevating their scientific discoveries.
By leveraging the insights and tools available, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of osmotic pressure and its role in fundamental biological processes, leading to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in the field of life sciences.