G1 Phase
This crucial stage ensures the cell is ready to progress through the subsequent phases of mitosis.
Optimize your G1 Phase research with PubCompare.ai - the AI-driven protocol comparison tool that helps you find the most reproducible and accuarate protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents.
Leverage our smart AI analysis to identify the best products and procedures for your G1 Phase experiments, ensuring dependable, high-quality results.
Discover the power of PubCompare.ai and take your G1 Phase research to new heights.
Most cited protocols related to «G1 Phase»
Since the mechanism of activation of the negative Cdc2/Cdc13 regulators is unknown, the authors of [9] (link) assumed a mechanism similar to budding yeast. In [9] (link) Slp1/APC degrades a hypothetical inhibitor of PP, which helps PP to become active. Recently, Clp1p has been proposed as a possible candidate for PP [37] (link). Following [25] (link), the helper molecules such as Start Kinases (SK) are inhibited, otherwise they prevent the final transition to the G1 stationary state. This is why in a Boolean model of the cell cycle helper molecules-Start Kinase (SK), Slp1, and PP-have self-inhibiting links. We further represent Wee1/Mik1 by one node, since they have similar function.
One also needs to distinguish activation levels of Cdc2/Cdc13. During the cell cycle, this complex has three different levels—low, intermediate, or high. It is also known that a high-level corresponds to dephosphorylation of the residue Tyr-15 of Cdc2. Therefore, Cdc2/Cdc13 is represented by two nodes: Cdc2/Cdc13 and Cdc2/Cdc13*, where the latter indicates the high activity state of Cdc2/Cdc13. During the G1 phase, when activity of Cdc2/Cdc13 is low, this corresponds to an inactive Cdc2/Cdc13 node. Intermediate levels of excitation correspond to activation of the node Cdc2/Cdc13, whereas high activity in the M phase is represented by the Cdc2/Cdc13* node being active in addition.
We focus on a case where checkpoints are disregarded except the checkpoint of the cell size. Also the change in the rate of DNA replication is neglected in the model. In comparison to [9] (link) we further neglect the phosphatase group Pyp3, which works in the absence of Cdc25, but does its job less effectively.
The networks and dynamical trajectories were drawn with Pajek [38] .
Single-cell bisulfite libraries were then prepared as previously described3 (link) but with the following modifications. Conversion was carried out using EZ Methylation Direct bisulfite reagent (Zymo) on purified DNA in the presence of AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) following G&T-seq. Purification and desulphonation of converted DNA was performed with magnetic beads (Zymo) on a Bravo Workstation (Agilent), eluting into the mastermix for the first strand synthesis. Primers for first and second strand synthesis contained a 3′-random hexamer and biotin capture of first strand products was omitted, however an extra 0.8× AMPure XP purification was performed between second strand synthesis and PCR. Each pre-PCR AMPure XP purification was carried out using a Bravo Workstation. To avoid batch effects all libraries were prepared in parallel in a 96 well plate. Purified scBS-seq libraries were sequenced in pools of 16-20 per lane of an Illumina HiSeq2000 using 125-bp paired-end reads.
RNA sequencing libraries were prepared from the single-cell cDNA libraries using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina) as per the manufacturer's instructions but using one-fifth volumes. Multiplexed library pools were sequenced on one lane of an Illumina HiSeq2000 generating 125-bp paired-end reads.
Typically, cells were grown in yeast extract peptone glucose medium (YPD) at 23°C and shifted to 30°C or the restrictive temperature for 3 h before observation. For synchronization, cells were incubated with 10 μg/ml of synthetic α factor for 2.5–3 h at 23°C until >95% of cells were in G1 phase. After washing with prewarmed medium to remove α factor, cells progressed synchronously through the cell cycle. Cells were arrested in metaphase by depletion of CDC20 under control of the pMet3 promoter by incubating the cells for 3–4 h in yeast extract peptone raffinose (YPR) medium supplemented with 2 mM methionine and 2 mM cysteine until >95% of cells were with a large bud. The APC was inactivated by incubating arrested pMet3-CDC20 cdc26Δ metaphase cells at 37°C. CDC14 and CDC14C283A were expressed from the pGal1 promoter cloned into yeast integration plasmids. The pGal1 promoter was induced by the addition of 2% galactose to the grow medium. ESP1-GFP was expressed from the native promoter cloned into the yeast integration plasmid pRS406.
Wells containing cells of interest, having completed mitosis, were washed with PBS and cells were subsequently trypsinized. After addition of an excess of fresh medium, daughter cells were separated by limited dilution into new wells in a fresh 384-well μClear plate. Successful separation and transfer into new wells was monitored using a fluorescence microscope. In cases where both daughters ended up in the same well, separation by limited dilution was repeated. After separation, the cells were left to attach for up to 4 hours prior to cell lysis.
Most recents protocols related to «G1 Phase»
Example 3
Lung cancer cell line A549 and squamous cell carcinoma cell line H10 expressing inducible SEQ ID NO: 1-HA vector were established as described previously. SEQ ID NO: 1 expression was detected by qPCR (
To evaluate the effects of SEQ ID NO: 1 on proliferation, A549 and H10 cells transduced with SEQ ID NO: 1-HA vector or control vector were monitored for 14 days. Growth curves show that cells overexpressing micropeptide SEQ ID NO: 1 have a consistently lower growth rate compared to the control (
For DNA extraction, the cell pellets were resuspended in buffer RINB (50mM Tris-HCl pH8, 0.1M EDTA, 0.1% (v/v) beta mercaptoethanol). Zymolyase was added to a final concentration of 2% (w/v). After incubating for 1h at 37°C, the solution was supplemented with 1% SDS (w/v), 0.2M NaCl, 0.1 mg/mL RNAse A, and 0.2 mg/mL proteinase K. After incubation for 1h at 55°C, DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. DNA pellets were suspended in 50μL of H2O. 5–10μg of DNA was then digested with EcoRI. The reactions were diluted 1:10 in H2O and analyzed by quantitative PCR using primers 0463/0466 (ARS305), 0552/0553 (ARS313), 0970/0971 (ARS315), 0837/0838 (ARS316), and 0834/0835 (ChrVI).
Top products related to «G1 Phase»
More about "G1 Phase"
During this crucial phase, the cell prepares for division by synthesizing the necessary enzymes, organelles, and other cellular components required for successful mitosis.
This ensures the cell is ready to progress through the subsequent phases of the cell cycle, including S phase, G2 phase, and finally, mitosis.
Optimizing your G1 phase research can be greatly enhanced by utilizing PubCompare.ai, an AI-driven protocol comparison tool.
PubCompare.ai helps researchers like you find the most reproducible and accurate protocols from the vast literature, preprints, and patent databases.
Leveraging the power of smart AI analysis, PubCompare.ai can identify the best products and procedures for your G1 phase experiments, ensuring dependable and high-quality results.
To further support your G1 phase research, it's important to be familiar with related techniques and reagents, such as propidium iodide staining, FACSCalibur flow cytometry, thymidine incorporation, nocodazole treatment, and the use of CellQuest software, RNase A, FBS, and FACScan.
These tools and methods can provide valuable insights into cell cycle progression and help you design robust experimental protocols.
By combining the insights from PubCompare.ai with a thorough understanding of the G1 phase and related techniques, you can take your research to new heights and uncover groundbreaking discoveries in cell biology.
Embark on your G1 phase journey with confidence and let PubCompare.ai be your trusted AI-powered companion.