We designed an object detection task, with three goals in mind: First, animals should be able to learn the task quickly, in a few days. Second, the sensory (whisker contacts and forces) and motor (whisking, licking) behaviors needed to be tracked at high spatial and temporal resolutions throughout learning. Third, we wanted to detect neurons in the motor cortex whose activity patterns might be shaped by sensory input. Since different object locations produce different somatosensory stimuli we presented the object in multiple locations. Neural activity levels that depend on object location then indicate coding of sensory variables.
Behavioral training began after the mice had restricted access to water for at least 7 days (1 ml/day) 5 (link),28 (link). The behavioral apparatus was designed to fit under a custom built two-photon microscope (https://openwiki.janelia.org/wiki/display/shareddesigns/ Shared+Two-photon+Microscope+Designs). All behavioral training was performed under the microscope while imaging neural activity. In a pre-training session mice learned to lick for water rewards from a lickport (~ 100 rewards). At the same time the brain was inspected for suitable imaging areas. Fields of view were restricted to zones where expression of GCaMP3 and tdTomato (axons from vS1) overlapped (Fig. 2a–d ). To escape the vasculature near the midline, imaging was typically performed towards the lateral edge of vM1. Mice with excessive brain movement, limited virus infection or impaired optical access (bone growth, large blood vessels in the vS1 axon projection zone) were excluded from the study.
During the first behavioral session (session 1) the pole was positioned within the range of the whiskers’ resting position, thereby increasing the chance of a whisker-pole collision. As soon as performance reached d′ > 1 the pole was advanced to a more anterior position (~0.5 mm from whisker resting position), forcing the mouse to sample actively for the pole. The target position was adjusted for every session. In expert mice, multiple target positions, all within reach of the whiskers, were introduced to study the effects of object location (Supplementary Fig. 8–11, 13, 15 , Supplementary Table 1 ).
Behavioral training began after the mice had restricted access to water for at least 7 days (1 ml/day) 5 (link),28 (link). The behavioral apparatus was designed to fit under a custom built two-photon microscope (
During the first behavioral session (session 1) the pole was positioned within the range of the whiskers’ resting position, thereby increasing the chance of a whisker-pole collision. As soon as performance reached d′ > 1 the pole was advanced to a more anterior position (~0.5 mm from whisker resting position), forcing the mouse to sample actively for the pole. The target position was adjusted for every session. In expert mice, multiple target positions, all within reach of the whiskers, were introduced to study the effects of object location (