Data recording and processing were carried out using the software NI™ DIAdem (National Instruments, Austin, TX, United States). To prepare the data for evaluation, ACC signals were converted from volts to angles. All raw signals (force, pressure, ACC) were filtered with low pass Butterworth filter (filter order: 10, cutoff frequency for force and pressure: 3 Hz, for ACC: 1 Hz). Thereupon, the following force parameters were extracted. It is to be noted that the force was recorded in V and was transformed after extraction into torque (Nm) by using the formula M = F *r, where F is the force in N (converted by 1 V = 19.886 kg * 9.81 = 195.082 N) and r is the length of the individual rotational axis (lever) in m.
1) Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)
The peak values of the MVIC trials were extracted. The highest values of the three MVIC trials before and of the two MVIC trials after the AF measurements were chosen as maxMVICpre (Nm) and maxMVICpost (Nm), respectively, and were used for further consideration.
2) Parameters of Adaptive Force
Exemplary force and angle signals of the arm and lever for one AF measurement are shown in
Figure 2, illustrating the main aspects of the evaluation of AF parameters.
2.1) Maximal Adaptive Force (AFmax)
The peak value of each AF trial is referred to as AF
max (Nm).
2.2) Maximal isometric Adaptive Force (AFisomax)
AFiso
max (Nm) defines the force value at the moment of first yielding of the forearm (breaking point). To determine this, a standardized algorithm was used according to Dech et al. (2021) (
link). The main criterion for AFiso
max was that a holding isometric action was present from the beginning of the measurement. Thus, the necessary defined conditions were yielding of the forearm ≤2° (isometric action is still acceptable) and a push back of lever I ≤ 0.3° (pushing isometric action or concentric muscular action were excluded thereby, which was not the case in the present study). The limit values have been set in previous investigations (Dech et al., 2021 (
link)). To determine the exact breaking point, the angles of the arm and lever were used. The second derivation was calculated from these to find the point of greatest curvature. AFiso
max was defined as the highest force value between the last maximum in angle signals (arm or lever) and the point of the subsequent greatest curvature before the forearm yielded more than 2° (arm angle). The deviation of the forearm (arm angle) at the beginning as shown in
Figure 2 occurred regularly as soon as the force increased. It was presumably due to the cushion of the interface, the participant’s hand, elbow, or shoulder joint. Lever I did not show this behavior; on the contrary, its angle showed a yielding mostly always from the beginning. However, it was decisive that the forearm was in an isometric position. Due to the still-novel algorithm, the determined AFiso
max values were also checked visually. In 359 of 360 trials, the detected AFiso
max corresponds to the visual assessment of the breaking point.
Different ratios were calculated for further consideration to gather information on the relation of torque parameters:
(%),
(%), and
(%).
Schaefer L.V., Carnarius F., Dech S, & Bittmann F.N. (2023). Repeated measurements of Adaptive Force: Maximal holding capacity differs from other maximal strength parameters and preliminary characteristics for non-professional strength vs. endurance athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, 1020954.