The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Physiology > Organism Function > Pain Perception

Pain Perception

Pain perception refers to the subjective experience of pain, including the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of pain processing.
It involves the detection, transmission, and interpretation of nociceptive signals by the somatosensory system.
Factors such as genetics, psychological state, and environmental influences can modulate an individual's pain perception.
Understanding pain perception is crucial for developing effective pain management strategies and improving the quality of life for individuals experiencing chronic or acute pain.
PubCompare.ai revolutionizes pain perception research by provideing users with powerful tools to locate cutting-edeging protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, enabling researchers to identify the best approaches and products to advance their pain perception studies.

Most cited protocols related to «Pain Perception»

The subjects were blinded to the procedures and could not see the sites undergoing stimulation from their supine position in the scanner. They were told that the acupuncture performed at different acupoints with different techniques would generate different needling sensations. Tactile (touch) stimulation was performed prior to acupuncture when the subjects were still naïve to acupuncture as a sensory comparison for the acupuncture stimulation. Thus, the comparison stimulation also took into account expectation and its placebo effects. Tactile stimulation and acupuncture were both performed at the same acupoint in 16 subjects each for LI4 and ST36, and 13 subjects for LV3. Three of the 42 subjects received tactile stimulation and acupuncture at all three acupoints; the remaining 39 subjects received acupuncture to all three acupoints, but only the paired tactile stimulation to the first of their acupoints. Analyses comparing tactile stimulation to acupuncture stimulation were performed on the paired sensory – acupuncture datasets. Data from all 3 acupoints for each subject was used in the Spearman's correlation of intensities of sensations in acupuncture.
Acupuncture and tactile stimulation control was delivered to LI4 on the hand, LV3 on the foot and ST36 on the lower leg on the right in randomized order by an acupuncturist with over 25 years of clinical experience (JL). The individual's sensitivity to needle manipulation was pretested, aiming to elicit deqi sensations without noxious pain. The stimulation paradigm is depicted in Figure 1. The needle was rotated approximately 180° in each direction with even motion at the rate of 60 times/min for 2 min during M1 and M2. The needle remained in place during the rest periods R1, R2 and R3. Each procedure lasted a total of ten minutes. In order to avoid excess discomfort, the subject was instructed to raise one finger if any sensation reached the intensity of 7–8 on a scale of 1–10 and 2 fingers in case of any sharp pain. When so signalled, the acupuncturist would adjust the force of stimulation so that the sharp pain would disappear within a few seconds. The acupuncture stimulation procedure was performed twice for each acupoint. Sterile, one-time use only stainless steel needles were used for LV3 (0.20 mm diameter) and ST36 (0.22 mm diameter) (KINGLI Medical Appliance Co. Wuxi, China). Silver needles (0.23 mm diameter) were used for LI4 (Matsuka, Tokyo, Japan). Superficial tactile stimulation was performed by gentle tapping with a size 5.88 von Frey monofilament, a standard method of sensory stimulation, prior to acupuncture with needling. The purpose of this design was to explore how acupuncture sensations might differ from the sensations elicited by the conventional sensory stimulus of touch. At the end of each tactile stimulation or acupuncture procedure, the subject was questioned by another researcher in the team if each of the deqi sensations (aching, pressure, soreness, heaviness, fullness, warmth, cooling, numbness, tingling, dull pain), sharp pain or any other sensations occurred during the stimulation, and to rate its intensity on the scale of 1–10 (1–3 mild, 4–6 moderate, 7–9 strong, 10 unbearable).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2007
Acupuncture Points Fingers Foot Hypersensitivity Leg Neoplasm Metastasis Pain Pain Perception Pressure Silver Stainless Steel Sterility, Reproductive Therapy, Acupuncture Touch

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2011
Human Body Muscles, Masseter Pain Pain Perception Podofilox Pressure Skin Temporal Muscle Trapezius Muscle
In order to evaluate the psychometric properties of the VAS, the NRS and the VRS, we evaluated convergent as well as discriminant validity (ie, two subsets of construct validity) by means of a multitrait-multimethod approach referring to the ideas of Campbell and Fiske.25 (link) Following this idea, the Bravais-Pearson correlation of indicators measuring the same construct (ie, convergent validity of scales measuring overall pain) were supposed to be r≥0.4526 (link) and substantially larger than the correlation of indicators measuring different constructs such as correlations of pain scales with age or disease duration which was supposed to reflect discriminant validity. In investigations involving pain measures, the potential interference with physical functioning frequently is a matter of concern. Therefore, we also calculated partial correlation coefficients for convergent validity as well as retest-reliability accounting for the influence of the HAQ-DI at corresponding time points.
Patients participating in this study were included in two subgroups depending on whether or not they required a change in antirheumatic therapy. In patients maintaining antirheumatic treatment, we investigated the retest reliability as an indicator of reproducibility between all pairs of time points for each of the three pain scales by Bravais-Pearson correlation coefficients. Coefficients of r≥0.70 were considered reliable.26 (link) In patients undergoing a change in antirheumatic therapy, for example, owing to side effects or lack of efficacy, we investigated the internal responsiveness of the pain scales to changes of antirheumatic treatment by calculating standardised response means (SRMs) between T1 and T3 as well as between T2 and T3. Corresponding SRMs were computed by dividing the mean change by the SD of the change scores. We favoured this measure of responsiveness over an additional health transition item at the last follow-up (measuring external responsiveness) as such an item would have compromised our intention to keep all sets of questionnaires identical. In the context of studies validating patient-reported outcomes, an SRM exceeding 0.8 is considered large.27 (link) Differences in the perception of pain before and after routine medical consultation were investigated via a t-test for dependent samples including a report of the corresponding effect size (r).
A subsequent analysis investigated these characteristics in patients with RA with and without comorbidity of osteoarthritis and/or chronic pain. In this analysis, we used the same coefficients that were applied for the total sample, whereas Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were calculated in comparisons including smaller subgroups (N<30). In this subsample, partial correlation coefficients and measures of internal responsiveness were omitted due to sample size limitations. Statistical calculations were computed using IBM SPSS V.21, while all inferential tests were two tailed. Descriptive results in the text are presented as mean±SD if not stated otherwise. Effect sizes are presented as r or r2, respectively.
Publication 2015
Antirheumatic Agents Chronic Pain Degenerative Arthritides Health Transition Pain Pain Perception Patients Physical Examination Psychometrics
Development of the original 8-week programs, details on program skills, and exit interviews to inform the current program versions have been previously reported [23 (link)]. The final GetActive and GetActive-Fitbit programs have 10 weekly 90-min sessions (Multimedia Appendix 3). The programs teach 4 core skills: (1) weekly SMART goal setting (defined as goals that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-based) [29 (link)] for a gradual increase in physical activity paired with activities of daily living that are meaningful and important to participants (ie, walk instead of drive to the store and walk to the park with kids) and the daily practice of mind-body skills (eg, engage in meditation before going to bed and when walking), (2) individualized quota-based pacing (eg, walk for 30 min or meet a step goal of 5000), (3) mind-body skills (diaphragmatic breathing to manage intense pain flares and pain anxiety, body scan to increase body awareness and reduce reactivity to pain sensations, mindfulness exercises to understand the transience of pain and change one’s relationship with it, and self-compassion when falling short of set goals), and (4) understand the disability spiral (eg, how reducing activity perpetuates pain and disability) and correct myths about pain or automatic pain-related thoughts that interfere with meeting program goals. At each weekly session, the group leader reviewed home practice, including adherence to activity goals, and helped participants solve barriers to adherence. Participants who missed group sessions were immediately contacted by the study staff and scheduled for a make-up session.
The GetActive and GetActive-Fitbit programs are identical in content and structure. However, in the GetActive-Fitbit program, the study staff instructed participants how to consistently wear and charge the Fitbit (session 1), uploaded an individualized step goal onto each participant’s Fitbit during each weekly session through Fitbit.com, monitored Fitbit wear in real time through the Fitabase website (Fitabase) [30 ], immediately called nonadherent participants to solve problems with adherence, and encouraged participants to focus on meeting the daily activity SMART goals.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2020
Anxiety Awareness Disabled Persons Human Body Meditation Mindfulness Pain Pain Perception Program Development Radionuclide Imaging Self-Compassion Teaching Thinking Transients Vaginal Diaphragm

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2011
Feelings Forearm Immune Tolerance Neoplasm Metastasis Obstetric Delivery Pain Pain Perception Pulse Rate Pulses Severity, Pain Skin Thermotolerance

Most recents protocols related to «Pain Perception»

Pain perception in male and female was assessed at the age of 13, 15, 17, and 20 months, using the hot plate test as described (Dere et al., 2014 (link)). Briefly, mice were placed on a preheated (55°C) metal plate (Ugo Basile Srl, Comerio, Italy) and the latency (s) to retract by jumping or licking of the hind paws was recorded. Mice were exposed for a maximum of 40 s, used as cut-off time, in case they did not show an aversive response to the heated plate.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Electroplating Females Males Mice, House Pain Perception
Room temperature was controlled at about 25 °C to avoid the influence of external temperature during the test. When mice were stimulated by heat, they felt pain and showed symptoms such as licking of the hind paw, lifting of the hind paw, and twisting of the waist. We used licking of the hind paw as an indicator of pain sensation. The mice were placed gently on a hot plate (55 ± 0.1 °C), and the latency in time to response (licking of the hind paw) was recorded. After the measurement, the mice were removed from the hot plate at once and sent to their homecage to rest.
Publication 2023
Feelings Mus Pain Pain Perception
Neuronal excitability was detected by whole-cell patch-clamp recording techniques as described previously.4 (link),16 (link) DiI-labeled neurons were identified by fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX71, Japan). For the patch-clamp recordings, small and medium sized DRG neurons were chosen in our study, because they were considered to be responsible for pain sensation.17 (link),18 (link) Resting potential (RPs) and action potentials (APs) were recorded. The voltage was clamped at −60 mV. Whole-cell current and voltage were recorded with a HEKA EPC10 patch-clamp amplifier. The data were acquired and stored on a computer and analyzed by Fit Master from HEKA. The above experiments were performed at room temperature (22°C).
Publication 2023
Action Potentials Cells Microscopy, Fluorescence Neurons Pain Perception Resting Potentials
A total of 56 healthy individuals (25♀, 31♂; 25.36 ± 3.9 years; BMI 23.0 ± 2.8) aged between 18 and 40 years were recruited. According to Faul et al.23 (link), an a priori biometric sample size calculation was performed, using the algorithm of G*Power, version 3.1.5 (Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany) for each of the two hypotheses. The computation showed hypothesis one (dorsal extension of the ankle at extended knees causes a higher displacement of SM than ankle movement at flexed knees) to require n = 29 individuals (α = 0.05, 1 − β  =  0.8, Cohen’s d = 0.5, Dropout: 5%). Hypothesis two (SM displacement depends on ankle movement/GM displacement) yielded a minimum of n = 56 participants (α = 0.05, 1 − β  =  0.8, Cohen’s f2 = 0.15, Dropout: 5%). Consequently, the enrollment of n = 56 individuals ensured sufficient power to detect both, significant differences (hypothesis 1) and associations (hypothesis 2) with medium effect sizes according to Cohen24 (link).
Flyer and poster advertising as well as personal addressing were used for recruitment. Exclusion criteria were defined as orthopedic, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine and psychiatric diseases, acute inflammation, intake of drugs that modify pain perception and proprioception, presence of delayed onset muscle soreness, pregnancy or nursing period, and history of surgery in the lower limb.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Ankle Cardiovascular System Inflammation Knee Lower Extremity Mental Disorders Movement Myalgia Operative Surgical Procedures Pain Perception Pharmaceutical Preparations Pregnancy Proprioception System, Endocrine
Upon enrolment, the patients arriving at the operation theatre without premedication were given 8 ml kg−1 Ringer’s solution via an intraoperative maintenance infusion of 4 ml kg−1 h−1. Standard physical monitoring was performed using an automated non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitor, 5-lead ECG and pulse oximetry. Systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR were recorded at intervals of 5 min during the entire operation. To objectively record the baseline parameters, baseline measurements were defined using the average of three readings obtained at an interval of 5 min before induction in the supine position on the operation bed.
PNB (femoral and sciatic nerve blocks) was performed under ultrasound guidance combined with a nerve stimulator (MultiStim SENSOR, PAJUNK, Geisingen, Germany). If electrical stimulation of ≤ 0.5 mA elicited a visible motor response in the quadriceps femoris for femoral nerve or in the gastrocnemius for sciatic nerve, approximately 20 ml of ropivacaine hydrochloride (3.5 mg ml−1) (Naropin, AstraZeneca AB, Sodertalje, Sweden) was injected. The block was considered satisfactory after confirming the presence of complete motor and sensory blocks. The presence of a motor block was assessed using the modified Bromage scale for the lower limb (0: normal motor function; 1: ability to only move the toes; and 2: inability to move the knee, ankle and toes), with a Bromage score of 2 indicating a complete block. The presence of a sensory block was assessed via the pin-prick method using a 26G hypodermic needle along the midline of the lower limb [15 (link)]. A successful sensory block was defined as a complete lack of pain sensation at the surgical field level. Patients who successfully achieved a complete block were randomly administered with 1.5 µg kg−1 h−1 DEX [16 (link)] (H20090248, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China) or 50 µg kg−1 h−1MID (H10980025, Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Xuzhou, China) [17 (link)]. The drug dosage was calculated according to the lean body weight (LBM), and the drugs were continuously administered during the procedure until wound irrigation. The parameters were recorded even after the operation was completed.
During inhalation of air, side effects such as hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg or DBP < 60 mmHg), bradycardia (HR < 55 bpm) and hypoxemia (SpO2 level < 93%) were observed and noted. An SpO2 level of < 93% was treated with 2–4 l min−1 oxygen administration. Hypotension was treated with 6 mg of intravenous ephedrine administration. Further, sinus bradycardia was treated with 0.5 mg of intravenous atropine administration. These side effects were reported by the anaesthesiologist who was blinded to the study protocol.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Anesthesiologist Ankle Atropine Body Weight Continuous Sphygmomanometers Ephedrine Femur Hypodermic Needles Inhalation Intravenous Infusion Knee Lower Extremity Muscle, Gastrocnemius Naropin Nerve Block Nerves, Femoral Nervousness Oximetry, Pulse Pain Perception Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Physical Examination Premedication Pressure, Diastolic Quadriceps Femoris Ringer's Solution Ropivacaine Hydrochloride Saturation of Peripheral Oxygen Sciatic Nerve Sinuses, Nasal Stimulations, Electric Systolic Pressure Therapies, Oxygen Inhalation Toes Ultrasonography Wounds

Top products related to «Pain Perception»

Sourced in Israel
The TSA-II is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis and characterization of various materials and samples. It is a versatile tool that can be used for a wide range of applications. The core function of the TSA-II is to provide accurate and reliable data on the thermal and physical properties of the samples under investigation.
Sourced in Israel
The COVAS is a laboratory equipment designed for conducting centrifugal operations. It features a variable speed control and can accommodate a range of sample sizes and volumes.
Sourced in Israel
The TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer is a diagnostic device used to measure and evaluate sensory function. It provides objective data on an individual's tactile, thermal, and vibratory sensations. The device is designed for use in various clinical settings to assess neurological and somatosensory conditions.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Israel, Hungary, Macao, Japan
Zymosan A is a laboratory reagent derived from the cell wall of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is composed of a complex mixture of carbohydrates, proteins, and other molecules. Zymosan A is commonly used in research to stimulate immune responses and as a tool to study inflammatory processes.
Sourced in Israel, United States
The Pathway system is a laboratory equipment designed for the analysis and visualization of biological pathways. It provides a platform for researchers to study the complex interactions and dependencies within cellular processes. The core function of the Pathway system is to enable the mapping and visualization of biological pathways, allowing for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and dynamics of various biological systems.
Sourced in United States
The ATS thermode is a precision laboratory instrument designed to generate and control thermal stimuli. It is primarily used in research applications that require accurate and reliable thermal stimulation.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany
SPSS is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a graphical user interface and a robust set of tools for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. SPSS is designed to handle a wide range of data types and supports a variety of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, factor analysis, and time series analysis.
Sourced in Israel
The TSA 2001 is a laboratory equipment designed for testing and analyzing various samples. It is a versatile instrument that can perform a range of analytical tasks. The core function of the TSA 2001 is to provide accurate and reliable data for scientific research and quality control purposes.
Sourced in United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, Austria, Sweden
Stata 13 is a comprehensive, integrated statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It provides a wide range of data management, statistical analysis, and graphical capabilities. Stata 13 is designed to handle complex data structures and offers a variety of statistical methods for researchers and analysts.

More about "Pain Perception"

Pain perception refers to the subjective experience of discomfort, agony, or distress, encompassing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of pain processing.
It involves the detection, transmission, and interpretation of nociceptive signals by the somatosensory system.
Factors such as genetics, psychological state, and environmental influences can modulate an individual's pain perception.
Understanding this complex phenomenon is crucial for developing effective pain management strategies and improving the quality of life for those experiencing chronic or acute pain.
PubCompare.ai revolutionizes pain perception research by providing users with powerful tools to locate cutting-edge protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, enabling researchers to identify the best approaches and products to advance their studies.
These may include the use of TSA-II (Thermal Sensory Analyzer II), COVAS (Computerized Visual Analog Scale), TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer, Zymosan A, Pathway system, ATS thermode, and statistical software like SPSS version and Stata 13.
By leveraging these innovative technologies and techniques, researchers can gain deeper insights into the complex mechanisms underlying pain perception and develop more effective interventions to alleviate human suffering.