The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Physiology > Organism Function > Pronation

Pronation

Pronation is the natural inward rolling of the foot during walking or running, which helps to absorb shock and distribute weight evenly.
It is an essential biomechanical process that supports proper foot function and alignment.
Pronation allows the foot to adapt to various terrains and surfaces, promoting stability and efficiency in gait.
Optimal pronation is crucial for preventing injuries and maintaining overall foot health.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai's AI-driven protocol comparisons to identify the best procedures and products for studying pronation, ensuring reproducibility and accuracy in their studies.

Most cited protocols related to «Pronation»

We recruited 50 patients with idiopathic PD meeting research diagnostic criteria21 (link) (Supporting Information Table 1). Subjects were videoed performing UPDRS-directed finger tapping, hand grasping, and pronation–supination tasks in the OFF (12–15 hours after dopaminergic drug withdrawal) and ON states while wearing wireless 6-degree-of-freedom motion sensors (KinetiSense, CleveMed, Cleveland, OH) on the index finger and thumb (Supplementary Fig. 1). Patients were asked to perform each of the 3 tasks by the more affected limb for 15 seconds with as large an amplitude and as fast movements as possible.
The videos were randomized for independent evaluation by 4 movement disorders neurologists who used the UPDRS and MBRS to score each task. The MBRS was developed by Kishore et al15 (link) for scoring speed, amplitude, and rhythm separately (Supporting Information Table 2). Approximately 4 weeks after scoring the videos, the same clinicians rescored the videos (rerandomized) to examine intrarater reliability. After the second scoring, the clinicians held a group training session using 15 videos containing each of the tasks (not included in the study data) in an attempt to normalize severity ratings across clinicians. Approximately 2 weeks after this training session, the videos were rerandomized and scored a third and final time by all 4 clinicians.
We assessed both agreement between clinicians (interrater reliability) as well as agreement of repetitions of ratings by each individual clinician (intrarater reliability). Scores for each MBRS subtask were correlated with their corresponding UPDRS scores to determine which movement components were given greater subjective weight when assigning a UPDRS score. MBRS scores were compared with several quantitative features extracted from the 2 motion sensors in order to examine their validity (extent to which they measure what they intend to measure).
Further details of the methods are available in the online Supporting Material.
Publication 2011
ARID1A protein, human Diagnosis Dopaminergic Agents Fingers Movement Movement Disorders Neurologists Patients Pronation Supination Thumb
The device used in the experiments is a Wrist robot (Figure 1.A) which was developed for motor control studies and rehabilitation. It has 3 DOFs (Degree of Freedom): F/E (Flexion/Extension); Ab/Ad (Abduction/Adduction); P/S (Pronation/Supination). The corresponding rotation axes meet at a single point. It allows the following range of motion (ROM): ; ; . These values approximately match the ROM of a typical human subject. The subjects held a handle connected to the robot and their forearms were strapped to a rigid holder in such a way that the biomechanical rotation axes were as close as possible to the robot ones. Unavoidable small misalignments were compensated for by means of a sliding connection between the handle and the robot.
The control architecture of the task integrates a) the wrist controller with b) a bi-dimensional visual environment (VE). The F/E DOF corresponds to the x (horizontal) axis of the VE and the Ab/Ad DOF t of the y (vertical) axis.
The wrist controller leaves the Ad/Ab and F/E DOFs un-actuated, whereas it implements a high-stiffness control scheme on the P/S DOF with two alternated operating modes during the different phases the experimental protocol: 1) maintaining the initial neutral P/S angle; 2) introducing a proprioceptive perturbation by enforcing a sinusoidal oscillation of the P/S indicated as θkin.
VE shows to the subjects on a computer screen the actual pointing direction of the hand (as a sort of virtual hand-held laser pointer) and the corresponding target direction, both represented as round circles of different colors against a textured background. The pointing direction is fed back on the computer screen using the Ad/Ab and F/E angular readouts with an appropriate scale factor (1 rad = 0.25 m); the P/S readout is not used for the pointing task. The VE software can also carry out a function of visual perturbation, by superimposing a sinusoidal rotation on the displayed patterns, including the background.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2009
ARID1A protein, human Epistropheus Fibrinogen Forearm Homo sapiens Medical Devices Muscle Rigidity Pronation Proprioception Rehabilitation Sinusoidal Beds Supination Vision Wrist
A stopwatch was used to time the 3-meter TUG and the 7-meter iTUG. A Matlab program automatically detected, separated and analyzed different components of gait and postural transition measures (sit-to-stand and turning) during the iTUG. The algorithms used have been discussed previously [19 ,21 ].
Motor UPDRS scores taken immediately prior to TUG and iTUG testing were also broken into 3 subscores:

Bradykinesia: sum of items 23 (finger tapping), 24 (hand open and closed), 25 (hand pronation/supination), and 26 (leg agility).

Rigidity: item 22 (neck, upper and lower body rigidity).

Gait/Posture: sum of items 27 (arising from chair), 28 (posture), 29 (gait), and 30 (postural stability).

During straight walk, individual gait cycles were detected and analyzed across 3 trials and the average values of the following gait parameters were investigated.
Publication 2009
Bradykinesia Fingers Human Body Muscle Rigidity Neck Pronation Supination
Patients were randomly assigned to receive robot-assisted therapy, intensive comparison therapy, or usual care with the use of a permuted-block design that was stratified according to site. Robot-assisted therapy was administered for a maximum of 36 sessions over a period of 12 weeks (up to 14 weeks to allow for missed sessions).
The robotic system consisted of four modules: a shoulder–elbow unit for horizontal movements; an antigravity unit for vertical movements; a wrist unit for flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and pronation–supination movements; and a grasp-hand unit for closing and opening movements. The 12 weeks of training consisted of four training blocks and were supervised by a therapist. In the first 3-week block, a planar shoulder-and-elbow training robotic device was used. In the second 3-week block, an antigravity shoulder and grasp-hand device was used. In the third 3-week block, the wrist robot was used. In the final block, all three devices were used to integrate proximal (shoulder) to distal (wrist and hand) training (see video).
Modules were used separately and in combination to perform high-intensity, repetitive, task-oriented movements (1024 per session on average), directed by video screens. Training targeted isolated proximal, distal, and integrated movements of the upper limb. The robot provided assistance if patients were unable to initiate or complete a movement independently.
Intensive comparison therapy consisted of a structured protocol using conventional rehabilitative techniques, such as assisted stretching, shoulder-stabilization activities, arm exercises, and functional reaching tasks. This therapy matched robot-assisted therapy in schedule and in the form and intensity of movements.4 (link),6 (link) The same research personnel delivered both robot-assisted therapy and intensive comparison therapy at each site.
The usual-care group received customary care available to all patients (i.e., medical management, clinic visits as needed, and in some cases rehabilitation services), which was not dictated by the protocol. Patients in the usual-care group were offered their choice of robot-assisted therapy or intensive comparison therapy after their final study visit.
Publication 2010
Clinic Visits Elbow Grasp Medical Devices Movement Patients Pronation Rehabilitation Shoulder Supination Therapeutics Upper Extremity Wrist
Subjects performed UPDRS-III-based finger-tapping (item 23), hand-grasping (item 24), and pronation-supination (item 25) tasks in the OFF state (12–15 hours after dopaminergic drug withdrawal) and the ON state (approximately 45–60 minutes after intake of subjects’ routine dopaminergic medications, when response was expected to be maximal). Subjects wore wireless 6-degree-of freedom motion sensors (Kineti-Sense, Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies, Inc., Cleveland, OH) on the index finger and thumb during each task (Fig. 1). Each motion sensor contained 3 orthogonal accelerometers to measure 3-D linear acceleration and 3 orthogonal gyroscopes to measure 3-D angular velocity. The units sampled motion at 128 Hz and wirelessly transmitted the data to a computer via a 2.4-GHz radio. Patients were asked to perform each of the 3 tasks using the more affected limb for 15 seconds with as large an amplitude and as fast movements as possible. Digital video was recorded of the limb-performing task for later blinded rating.
Publication 2011
Acceleration Dopaminergic Agents Fingers Movement Neoplasm Metastasis Patients Pronation Supination Thumb

Most recents protocols related to «Pronation»

The maximum isokinetic strength of the quadriceps was assessed using a dynamometer (MYORET RZ-450; Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Kobe, Japan). Prior to the muscle strength test, participants warmed up using a stationary cycling ergometer for 5 min at low resistance. The participant sat on the seat of the dynamometer and was stabilized using straps. The test was first performed with the dominant leg. Each participant performed two practice contractions, followed by five maximal effort contractions at 60°/s. The test was repeated on the non-dominant leg. The peak extension torque was recorded as raw data in Newton meters (Nm) and was normalized according to body weight (Nm/kg).
Handgrip strength was measured using a grip strength dynamometer (TKK 5401; Takei Scientific Instruments, Niigata, Japan). To perform the test, the participant was seated in a chair with the shoulders neutral, elbows at 90° flexion, and forearms neutral in supination/pronation. The participant was given verbal encouragement to squeeze the dynamometer as tightly as possible for 2 or 3 s. Two trials were performed for each measurement, and the higher value was used. The order of measurement between the right and left hands was randomized for each participant.10 (link))
Publication 2023
Body Weight Forearm Joints, Elbow Muscle Strength Pronation Quadriceps Femoris Shoulder Supination Torque
Ten patients undergoing posterior elbow surgery were selected for the present study. All patients were subjected to standard elbow radiographs (Fig. 2) as well as computed tomography (CT) scan (Fig. 3) with all procedures conducted in the orthopedic department of El-Demerdash hospital, Ain Shams University (prospective study). The study was approved by the University’s ethics committee (approval no. FMASU R 191/2022) and informed consent was signed by each patient.
Patients with displaced Mason type II isolated posteromedial radial head fracture with no neurovascular deficit were included in the study. On clinical examination, the patients had tenderness over the radial head and limitation of flexion-extension arc. The elbows were blocked in pronation with no active or passive supination. Exclusion criteria were: patients under the age of 18 years and revision surgery.
Publication 2023
Elbow Ethics Committees Head Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Physical Examination Pronation Radial Head Fractures Radionuclide Imaging Repeat Surgery salicylhydroxamic acid Supination X-Ray Computed Tomography X-Rays, Diagnostic
Patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position. A tourniquet was used in all cases. The elbow was exposed via a posterior incision, and a global approach was followed. The ulnar nerve was routinely identified, released from the tunnel, and protected. Broad medial and lateral full-thickness soft tissue flaps were elevated, and the elbow joint was exposed. The coronoid process fracture was addressed first, according to the Regan-Morrey classification.8 (link) Fixation of the coronoid process was performed for type II and III fractures, while type I coronoid tip fractures did not require fixation. The radial head fracture was then repaired or replaced with an artificial implant according to the fracture pattern and bone quality.
Once bony reconstruction was complete, we used a Kirschner-wire (K-wire) to drill a tunnel under the guidance of an aim-device (cruciate ligament reconstruction guide) from the lateral aspect into the distal humerus along the rotation axis of the ulnohumeral joint. The rotation axis could be determined by direct visualizing of the anatomic center of the capitellum and the origin of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). After the tunnel was created, the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex injury was repaired by direct suture or reattached to the lateral epicondyle. Most LCL injuries presented as an avulsion fracture over the lateral epicondyle. Anatomical fixation of the LCL could be fulfilled through reattaching the avulsion fragment back to the fracture site using one or two anchor sutures. The MCL complex was not repaired whether residual elbow instability existed or not.
Subsequently, an IJS, as described by Orbay et al, was prepared.6 (link) The IJS was created from a 2.4 mm K-wire with a figure-of-eight formed first on the blunt end to accept two 3.5 mm screws and washers for attachment to the ulna. The axis portion was established by making a sharp bend at the proper location and then cut to the appropriate length. The IJS was applied and attached to the proximal ulna with two 3.5 mm screws and washers while the elbow was in 90 flexion with an anatomic concentric reduction position. Restoration of elbow flexion/extension, pronation/supination, and stability in all directions were assessed under fluoroscopic guidance before wound closure.
Publication 2023
Artificial Implants Bones Collateral Ligaments Decompression Sickness Drill Epistropheus Fluoroscopy Fracture, Avulsion Fracture, Bone Humerus Injuries Joints Joints, Elbow Kirschner Wires Ligaments Medical Devices Patients Pronation Radial Head Fractures Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Regan isoenzyme Supination Surgical Flaps Sutures Tissues Tourniquets Ulna Ulnar Nerve Wounds
From January 2015 to December 2020, 15 consecutive cases with terrible triad injuries of the elbow in patients age over 65 years were treated using the described technique by a single surgeon (CHM) (Table 1). A minimum of 1 year of follow-up (range, 16-36 months) was fulfilled for all cases. There were eight men and seven women with a mean age of 70.6 years (range, 66-78 years). The mechanism of injury was falls (9 patients) and traffic accidents (6 patients). The study was approved by the institutional review board (EMRP-109-157), and informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Patients’ Demographic Data.

CaseSex/AgeMechanismClassification and TreatmentAssociated InjuryComorbidity
Radial HeadCoronoid
1F/68FallType I-ORIFType IDM
2F/67Traffic accidentType III-PRType II-ORIFHTN, CAD
3M/70Traffic accidentType II-ORIFType III-ORIFIntracranial hemorrhage
4F/66Traffic accidentType III-ORIFType ILiver cirrhosis, child A
5M/78FallType III-PRType I
6M/72FallType II-ORIFType II-ORIFIpsilateral distal radial fracture
7F/78FallType II-ORIFType IESRD, DM, HTN
8M/70FallType II-ORIFType III-ORIF
9M/71Traffic accidentType III-ORIFType II-ORIFEpidural hemorrhageDM
10M/73FallType I-ORIFType I
11M/69FallType II-ORIFType I
12F/74Traffic accidentType III-PRType II-ORIFIpsilateral clavicle fracture
13F/66FallType III-PRType I
14F/70Traffic accidentType II-ORIFType IRheumatoid arthritis
15M/68FallType II-ORIFType IDM, HTN

F, female; M, male; ORIF, open reduction internal fixation; PR, prothesis radius; DM, diabetes mellitus; CAD, cardiovascular disease.

Plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) were performed to evaluate osseous abnormalities in all patients preoperatively (Figure 1(A)), and plain radiographic exams in two views were arranged at each post-surgery visit (Figure 1(B) and 1(C)). The Regan-Morrey classification was used to classify coronoid fractures based on the results of CT scans preoperatively.8 (link) Radial head fractures were classified according to the original Mason classification.9 (link)

(A1) Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction, (A2) lateral radiograph of a 67-year-old woman who sustained a right “terrible triad injury” with a type II coronoid fracture. (B1) Anteroposterior and (B2) lateral radiographs of the patient status post open reduction of the elbow joint, fixation of the coronoid process with screws, radial head arthroplasty, lateral collateral ligament repair, and internal joint stabilizer implantation. (C1) Anteroposterior and (C2) lateral radiographs of the patient showing a stable elbow joint after removing the internal joint stabilizer. Functional range of motion observed at the 1-year follow-up showing (D1) extension, (D2) flexion, (D3) pronation, and (D4) supination.

Publication 2023
Arthroplasty Bones Cardiovascular Diseases Child Clavicle Congenital Abnormality Diabetes Mellitus Elbow Injuries Ethics Committees, Research External Lateral Ligament Fracture, Bone Fracture Fixation, Internal Head Injuries Joints Joints, Elbow Liver Cirrhosis Males Open Fracture Reductions Operative Surgical Procedures Ovum Implantation Patients Pronation Radial Head Fractures Radionuclide Imaging Radius Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Regan isoenzyme Supination Surgeons Traffic Accidents Triad resin Woman X-Ray Computed Tomography X-Rays, Diagnostic
The experimental platform mainly includes a PC, a control module, an upper-limb prosthesis and other devices, as shown in Figure 1. We independently designed, drew, and welded the control module and integrated the parts above to perform the following experiment.
The parameters of the biphasic current waveform are adjustable (orange dashed rectangle in Figure 1): frequency (reciprocal of period) = 100∼500 Hz (100 Hz increments), pulse width = 100∼500 μs (100 μs increments), delay = 100∼500 μs (100 μs increments), current amplitude = 0∼8 mA (0.25 mA increments, 5 mA max for position and movement sense experiment), and burst duration = 0.5∼1 second (100 ms increments).
All subjects were required to sit on a chair in a comfortable posture; the able-bodied subjects’ dominant arms were placed on a sponge pad, and the plane of the palms was perpendicular to the ground. Amputees placed the residual limb on a sponge pad as well and were asked to keep the phantom palm in a straight (ST) position. For consistency, the circumference of 10–12 cm above the styloid process of the ulna and 2–4 cm above the amputation end were the places where able-bodied and amputees attached stimulation electrodes, respectively. A reference electrode was attached to the olecranon for each subject. CH1 is on the volar side, and eight channels were equally attached and arranged along the pronation direction. The connecting line of the centers of eight circular electrodes formed a plane perpendicular to the connecting line of the wrist and elbow (Figure 1).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amputation Amputees Arecaceae Arm, Upper Arm Prostheses Joints, Elbow Medical Devices Movement Olecranon Process Porifera Pronation Pulse Rate Ulna Venous Catheter, Central Wrist

Top products related to «Pronation»

Sourced in United States
The Biodex chair is a versatile piece of lab equipment designed to support various medical and research applications. It features a motorized, adjustable seat that can be positioned for patient comfort and ease of access during procedures or examinations. The chair's core function is to provide a stable, comfortable, and adjustable seating solution for individuals undergoing medical tests, treatments, or evaluations in a laboratory setting.
Sourced in Germany
An electronic goniometer is a device used to measure and record angles. It consists of a protractor-like mechanism with digital readouts that can precisely measure the angle between two intersecting lines or surfaces.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Belgium, Austria, China, Denmark, Spain
SPSS 22.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed to analyze and manipulate data, providing users with a range of statistical tools and techniques for various applications, including market research, survey data analysis, and social science research.
Sourced in United Kingdom
Spike2 v7 is a data acquisition and analysis software for Windows. It is designed to capture, display, and analyze electrophysiological data from various sources.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Austria, Morocco, Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, China, France, Denmark, Norway, Hungary, Malaysia, Israel, Finland, Spain
MATLAB is a high-performance programming language and numerical computing environment used for scientific and engineering calculations, data analysis, and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for solving complex mathematical and computational problems.
Sourced in United States
The Purdue Pegboard Test (Model 32020) is a standardized assessment tool designed to measure manual dexterity and bimanual coordination. It consists of a board with rows of holes into which the user must insert small pegs using specific patterns. The test provides quantifiable data on an individual's fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination.
Sourced in United Kingdom
The Vicon motion analysis system is a precision measurement device designed to capture and analyze the movement of objects and subjects. The system uses a network of cameras to track the position and orientation of markers placed on the subject or object, providing accurate data on their motion and positioning.
Sourced in United States
SPSS 24.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a variety of data analysis and statistical modeling tools, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and multivariate techniques. The software is designed to help users analyze and interpret complex data sets.
Sourced in United States
EnCORE software is a versatile data analysis platform designed for GE Healthcare's medical imaging and diagnostic equipment. It provides tools for processing, visualizing, and interpreting data from various imaging modalities. The software's core function is to facilitate the efficient analysis and evaluation of medical imaging data.
Sourced in United States
The Bagnoli is a laboratory equipment product designed for signal acquisition and processing. It provides a platform for capturing and analyzing various types of signals, including electromyographic (EMG) and other physiological signals. The Bagnoli offers a versatile and reliable solution for researchers and scientists working in the field of biomechanics, neuroscience, and related disciplines.

More about "Pronation"

Pronation: The Key to Optimal Foot Function and Injury Prevention Pronation is a critical biomechanical process that plays a vital role in our gait and overall foot health.
During walking or running, the natural inward rolling of the foot, known as pronation, helps to absorb shock and distribute weight evenly.
This adaptability allows the foot to navigate various terrains and surfaces, promoting stability and efficiency in our movements.
Optimal pronation is essential for preventing injuries and maintaining proper foot alignment.
Researchers can leverage advanced tools like the Biodex chair, electronic goniometers, and motion analysis systems (e.g., Vicon) to study the intricacies of pronation.
By utilizing software such as SPSS, MATLAB, and EnCORE, they can rigorously analyze data and identify the best protocols and products for their pronation research.
Understanding the nuances of pronation is crucial for healthcare professionals, athletes, and individuals seeking to maintain foot well-being.
Techniques like the Purdue Pegboard Test can provide valuable insights into fine motor skills and dexterity, complementing the assessment of pronation patterns.
By leveraging the power of AI-driven protocol comparisons from platforms like PubCompare.ai, researchers can ensure the reproducibility and accuracy of their pronation studies, leading to more robust findings and advancements in this critical area of biomechanics and foot health.