The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Procedures > Health Care Activity > Infection Control

Infection Control

Infection Control: Discover the AI-powered platform that optimizes your research protocols and boosts reproducibility in Infection Control.
Leverage cutting-edge comparisons to identify the most effective approaches from literature, preprints, and patents.
Streamline your research process, drive innovation, and enhance the field of Infection Control with PubCompare.ai.

Most cited protocols related to «Infection Control»

The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined as the first day, during the 28 days after enrollment, on which a patient met the criteria for category 1, 2, or 3 on the eight-category ordinal scale. The categories are as follows: 1, not hospitalized and no limitations of activities; 2, not hospitalized, with limitation of activities, home oxygen requirement, or both; 3, hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requiring ongoing medical care (used if hospitalization was extended for infection-control or other nonmedical reasons); 4, hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen but requiring ongoing medical care (related to Covid-19 or to other medical conditions); 5, hospitalized, requiring any supplemental oxygen; 6, hospitalized, requiring noninvasive ventilation or use of high-flow oxygen devices; 7, hospitalized, receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); and 8, death.
The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15, as assessed on the ordinal scale. Other secondary outcomes included the time to improvement of one category and of two categories from the baseline ordinal score; clinical status as assessed on the ordinal scale at days 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29; mean change in status on the ordinal scale from day 1 to days 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29; time to discharge or National Early Warning Score of 2 or less (maintained for 24 hours), whichever occurred first; change in the National Early Warning Score from day 1 to days 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29; number of days with supplemental oxygen, with noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, and with invasive ventilation or ECMO up to day 29 (if these were being used at baseline); the incidence and duration of new oxygen use, of noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, and of invasive ventilation or ECMO; number of days of hospitalization up to day 29; and mortality at 14 and 28 days after enrollment. Secondary safety outcome measures included grade 3 and 4 adverse events and serious adverse events that occurred during the trial, discontinuation or temporary suspension of infusions, and changes in assessed laboratory values over time.
Publication 2020
COVID 19 Early Warning Score Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Hospitalization Infection Control Mechanical Ventilation Medical Devices Noninvasive Ventilation Oxygen Patient Discharge Patients Safety

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2015
Eligibility Determination Infection Control Inpatient Patients Surgical Wound Infection
The Oxford University Hospitals, comprising four hospitals with a total of approximately 1600 beds (mostly in 4-bed bays within discrete areas of wards containing 20 to 30 beds), provide all acute care and more than 90% of hospital services in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom (approximate population, 600,000). During the study, the infection-control practices in this hospital system were in keeping with published guidelines (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).1 (link),2 (link) All inpatients with diarrhea (defined as ≥3 stools within a 24-hour period that took the shape of a container) underwent testing for the presence of C. difficile. The hospitals’ central microbiology laboratory used enzyme immunoassays for toxins A and B (Meridian Bioscience) to test all samples obtained in the hospitals and the community.
From September 2007 through March 2011, all such samples with positive results on enzyme immunoassay were cultured. Subcultured single colonies from culture-positive isolates underwent multilocus sequence typing10 (link),15 (link) and whole-genome sequencing. Repeat isolates of the same sequence type from the same patient were not sequenced, except for 148 randomly selected sample pairs that were used to estimate rates of within-host diversity and evolution (see the Supplementary Appendix). We sequenced repeat isolates with different sequence types from the same patient, which allowed us to account for the effect of mixed infections and reinfections on transmission.16 (link)Data were available for all patients on hospital admissions, movement throughout the hospital, and home postal-code districts (28 distinct locations) and general medical practices.
Publication 2013
Biological Evolution Coinfection Diarrhea Enzyme Immunoassay Feces Infection Control Inpatient Meridians Movement Patients Reinfection Toxins, Biological Transmission, Communicable Disease

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2020
COVID 19 Genome Health Personnel Health Services, National Hospital Administration Infection Infection Control Infections, Hospital Movement Patients Patient Safety Pholidota SARS-CoV-2 Sequence Alignment Sequence Analysis Strains Virus

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2020
COVID-19 Vaccines COVID 19 Infection Infection Control isolation Vaccination Vaccines Virus Vaccine, Influenza

Most recents protocols related to «Infection Control»

Data for this study were drawn from two open prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver, Canada: the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS) and the AIDS Care Cohort to evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS). Both cohorts have been described in detail in previous literature [24 (link), 27 (link)]. However, to briefly summarize, these cohorts have been recruiting participants through community-based methods, including street outreach, self-referral, and word of mouth since May of 1996. VIDUS includes adults (18 years and older) who are HIV-negative and have injected unregulated drugs within the month prior to their enrolment. ACCESS participants are HIV-positive adults who used any unregulated substance (other than or in addition to cannabis) within the month prior to their enrolment. Participants in the VIDUS cohort who HIV seroconvert after their enrolment are transferred to the ACCESS cohort. All participants provided written informed consent at enrolment and ethics has been approved by Providence Health Care/University of British Columbia’s Research Ethics Board. Both cohorts use harmonized study protocols to facilitate pooled analyses.
At baseline and at 6-month intervals afterwards, participants complete interviewer- and nurse-led questionnaires and provide blood samples for serology, as well as urine for drug screening. The questionnaire covers a variety of topics including demographics, substance use, healthcare access, and socio-structural exposures. To compensate participants for their involvement, participants receive a $40 CAD stipend for every study visit.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all in-person data collection was suspended between March 2020 and July 2020. After July 2020, infection control measures were put in place to resume data collection. Participant interviews were completed over telephone or videoconferencing. Study-owned cell phones and private spaces were loaned to those who required them. They were then able to pick up their cash honoraria in person or have it e-transferred if they had access to a bank account.
Between March and July of 2020, study questionnaires were modified to include questions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. One of these questions was used to assess the primary outcome of this study, which read as follows: “Has the frequency of your use of these sites [i.e., SCS/OPS] changed since the beginning of the public health emergency?”. The outcome was dichotomized using the following responses: “I use them less” vs. “I use them more” or “My use stayed the same”. Potential correlates were identified based on past studies that assessed SCS access among PWUD [8 (link), 25 (link)], and included: age (per year older), self-identified gender (man vs. woman/other), ethnicity/ancestry (white vs. Black, Indigenous, and people of colour), education (high school or greater vs. other), employment (yes vs. no), residence in Downtown Eastside neighbourhood in Vancouver (yes vs. no), daily non-medical prescription opioid use (yes vs. no), daily cocaine use (yes vs. no), daily crystal methamphetamine use (yes vs. no), daily non-injection crack-cocaine use (yes vs. no), benzodiazepine use (yes vs. no), suspected that a drug used contained fentanyl (yes vs. no), used drugs alone (yes vs. no), engagement in opioid agonist therapy (yes vs. no), non-fatal overdose (yes vs. no), witnessed an overdose (yes vs. no), experience physical violence (yes vs. no), syringe/ drug use equipment sharing (yes vs. no), inability to access treatment (yes vs. no), unstable housing (yes vs. no), sex work (yes vs. no), incarceration (yes vs. no), jacked up (this refers to being stopped, searched, or detained) by the police (yes vs. no), cohort/ HIV status (ACCESS vs. VIDUS), ever tested positive for COVID-19 (yes vs. no), concern about COVID-19 on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 indicating greatest concern (1–5 vs. 6–10), any chronic health conditions (yes vs. no), and ease of accessing SCS/OPS changed since COVID-19 (same vs. easier vs. harder). All drug use and behavioral variables refer to the 6 months prior to questionnaire date unless otherwise indicated.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the correlates of interest and reduced frequency of SCS/OPS use since COVID-19. Correlates of interest with a univariable p-value < 0.10 were included in a backward elimination procedure, with the least significant variable removed at each step until the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was achieved. All p-values were two-sided and all statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Abuse, Physical Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Adult Benzodiazepines BLOOD Cannabis Chronic Condition Cocaine COVID 19 Crack Cocaine Drug Abuser Drug Overdose Emergencies Ethnicity Fentanyl Gender Infection Control Interviewers Methamphetamine Nurses Opioids Oral Cavity Pharmaceutical Preparations Substance Use Urine Woman
This descriptive study involved 5,260 workplace chief representatives of 33 workers’ unions of the Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions (TURK-IS), the largest trade union confederation in Turkey according to the number of members. The study protocol was approved by the Ministry of Health Directorate General of Health Services and the Non-interventional Researches Ethical Board of Hacettepe University (decision number: 2021/06-48). The TURK-IS board gave permission for the study and sent the online survey link to all workplace chief representatives via e-mail on May 21, 2021. Three reminders were sent on the 5th, 10th, and 14th days, and data collection was terminated on June 21, 2021.
Data were collected via a 42-item online survey through Google Forms. Three national guidelines (i.e., The Ministry of Health’s Guideline for the Management of COVID-19 Outbreak and Work, the Ministry of Industry and Technology’s Hygiene, Prevention and Control of Infection Guideline for Industrial Organizations, and the Ministry of Family, Work, and Social Services’ Guideline for Workplace Measures Against COVID-19) were used in preparing survey items.14 ,15 ,16 The survey included five subheadings: workplace features, job practice, social distancing and PPE use, sanitization, and OSH training on COVID-19. Participants were asked to choose among four options: always, partially, no idea, and no. In addition to measures, any diagnosis of COVID-19 among workers and any mortality related to COVID-19 were also questioned. The last open-ended item included any other issues to mention. The survey questions were adjusted after feedback from a pretest conducted in a factory in Ankara, Turkey, that is, the inclusion of 15 workers other than the workplace chief representatives of a union. The pretest results were not included in the study data.
Publication 2023
COVID 19 Diagnosis Infection Control Workers
To measure viral load in participants with COVID-19 and rule out asymptomatic infection in controls, quantitative reverse transcription PCR in all mid-turbinate swabs collected at enrolment using United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention primers and probes designed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 was performed [16 (link)]. High viral load was defined as a cycle threshold value for the detection of the coronavirus nucleocapsid gene region 1 below the median of all samples collected at enrolment (day 1) from SARS-CoV-2-infected participants.
Publication 2023
Coronavirus Infections COVID 19 Genes Infection Control Nucleocapsid Oligonucleotide Primers Reverse Transcription SARS-CoV-2 Turbinates

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Awareness COVID 19 Infection Control Infections, Hospital Isopropyl Alcohol Patients Patient Safety

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Concept Formation Disease Outbreaks Geriatricians Health Personnel Infection Control Public Health Surveillance SARS-CoV-2

Top products related to «Infection Control»

Sourced in United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, France, Italy, Switzerland, Australia, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Singapore, India, Netherlands, Sweden, New Zealand, Portugal, Poland, Israel, Lithuania, Hong Kong, Argentina, Ireland, Austria, Czechia, Cameroon, Taiwan, Province of China, Morocco
Lipofectamine 2000 is a cationic lipid-based transfection reagent designed for efficient and reliable delivery of nucleic acids, such as plasmid DNA and small interfering RNA (siRNA), into a wide range of eukaryotic cell types. It facilitates the formation of complexes between the nucleic acid and the lipid components, which can then be introduced into cells to enable gene expression or gene silencing studies.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Sao Tome and Principe, United Kingdom, Macao, Canada, France, Japan, Switzerland, Italy, Australia, Netherlands, Morocco, Israel, Ireland, Belgium, Denmark, Norway
Polybrene is a cationic polymer used as a transfection reagent in cell biology research. It facilitates the introduction of genetic material into cells by enhancing the efficiency of DNA or RNA uptake.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Sao Tome and Principe, United Kingdom, Macao, Canada, Japan, Italy, Switzerland, France, Israel, Australia, Spain, Belgium, Morocco, Sweden
Puromycin is a laboratory product manufactured by Merck Group. It functions as an antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells.
Sourced in United States, China, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, France, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, Denmark, Spain, Singapore, Belgium, Lithuania, Israel, Sweden, Austria, Moldova, Republic of, Greece, Azerbaijan, Finland
Lipofectamine 3000 is a transfection reagent used for the efficient delivery of nucleic acids, such as plasmid DNA, siRNA, and mRNA, into a variety of mammalian cell types. It facilitates the entry of these molecules into the cells, enabling their expression or silencing.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, Belgium, Israel, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Italy, France, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland, Finland
Prism 6 is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It provides tools for curve fitting, statistical analysis, and data visualization.
Sourced in United States
Ad-gal is a recombinant adenovirus vector that expresses the bacterial beta-galactosidase (lacZ) gene. It can be used for gene delivery and expression studies in various cell types.
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, India, Brazil, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Australia
Vero E6 cells are a continuous cell line derived from the kidney of the African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). They are widely used in various applications, including virus propagation, cytotoxicity assays, and vaccine development.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada, France, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Gabon, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Brazil, Macao, India, Singapore, Poland, Argentina, Cameroon, Uruguay, Morocco, Panama, Colombia, Holy See (Vatican City State), Hungary, Norway, Portugal, Mexico, Thailand, Palestine, State of, Finland, Moldova, Republic of, Jamaica, Czechia
Penicillin/streptomycin is a commonly used antibiotic solution for cell culture applications. It contains a combination of penicillin and streptomycin, which are broad-spectrum antibiotics that inhibit the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sourced in United States, Austria, Canada, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, China, Japan, Poland, Israel, Switzerland, New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Sweden
Prism 8 is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It is designed for researchers to visualize, analyze, and present scientific data.

More about "Infection Control"

Infection Control is a critical field that focuses on preventing the spread of infectious diseases in healthcare settings and the community.
This encompasses a wide range of strategies, including hand hygiene, surface disinfection, personal protective equipment (PPE), and the proper handling of medical equipment.
One key aspect of Infection Control is the optimization of research protocols to ensure reproducibility and the identification of the most effective approaches.
PubCompare.ai, an AI-powered platform, can help researchers streamline their processes and drive innovation in this field.
Leveraging cutting-edge comparisons, PubCompare.ai allows researchers to easily identify the best protocols from the literature, preprints, and patents.
This can include techniques like Lipofectamine 2000 for efficient gene delivery, Polybrene for enhancing viral transduction, and Puromycin for selecting successfully transduced cells.
Additionally, the platform can help researchers evaluate the use of other common reagents in Infection Control research, such as Lipofectamine 3000, FBS for cell culture, Prism 6 and Prism 8 for data analysis, Ad-gal for adenoviral transduction, Vero E6 cells for virus propagation, and Penicillin/streptomycin for preventing bacterial contamination.
By streamlining the research process and identifying the most effective approaches, PubCompare.ai can help drive innovation and enhance the field of Infection Control, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and better public health.