The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Appendectomy

Appendectomy: A surgical procedure to remove the appendix, a small pouch attached to the first part of the large intestine.
This procedure is commonly performed to treat appendicitis, an inflammation of the appendix.
Appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed abdominal surgeries, with established techniques and protocols.
Researchers can utilize PubComapre.ai's AI-driven platform to efficiently locate and compare appendectomy protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing research efficiency and confidence in identifying the most accurate and reproducicble methods.

Most cited protocols related to «Appendectomy»

The Clinformatics™ Data Mart captures administrative health claims across the United States for members of a large national managed care company affiliated with OptumInsight (Eden Prairie, MN). We examined claims from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015 among adults ages 18 to 64 to capture surgical procedures performed between 2013 and 2014 to account for the 12-month preoperative and 6-month postoperative study period. We included only individuals with continuous medical and prescription drug coverage to evaluate the complete health care experience. We excluded patients ages 18 and younger, as well as patients older than 64 years due to incomplete capture of Medicare Part D prescriptions claims data. The study was deemed exempt from review by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board.
We selected 13 common elective surgical procedures, and categorized these into minor and major groups based on prior literature. Minor surgical procedures included varicose vein removal, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, transurethral prostate surgeries, and parathyroidectomy. Major surgical procedures included ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surgery, and hysterectomy. We identified patients undergoing surgery using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD9_ procedure codes (Supplemental Table 1).
We sought to determine new persistent opioid use after surgery, and included only patients who filled an opioid prescription fill either in the month prior to surgery or within two weeks after discharge. Comparable to previous studies of opioid naïve surgical populations,7 (link),8 patients who had filled one or more prescriptions for opioids 12 months to 31 days prior to their surgical procedure were excluded from the analysis (Figure 1). To account for prescriptions provided preoperatively for postoperative pain control, patients filling opioids in the 30 days prior to surgery were included, and prescriptions filled in this time was included as a covariate in the analyses. Lastly, we excluded patients who underwent additional surgical procedures during the study period using subsequent procedural codes for anesthesia in the 6-month postoperative period.
As a comparison cohort of patients who did not undergo surgery, we identified a random 10% sample patients ages 18 to 64 years of age who did not undergo surgery in the study period We included only patients in the nonoperative group who did not fill an opioid prescription during a 12 month period and did not have any codes for surgical procedures or anesthesia during this period. These patients were then given a random date of surgery. No patients had an opioid fill in the year prior to their fictitious surgery date nor did they have any anesthesia codes in the 6 months following their fictitious surgery date.
Publication 2017
Adult AN 12 Anesthesia Appendectomy Bariatric Surgery Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Colectomy Elective Surgical Procedures Ethics Committees, Research Hemorrhoidectomy Herniorrhaphy Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Managed Care Minor Surgical Procedures Operative Surgical Procedures Opioids Pain, Postoperative Parathyroidectomy Patient Discharge Patients Prescription Drugs Prostate Surgery, Day Thyroidectomy Varices Youth
Over the 6‑month period covering April 2010 to September 2010, all patients admitted to one of our patient wards at the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna were included in this study.
The Division of General Surgery in our university hospital consists of the following teams and specializations: colorectal surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, endocrine surgery, upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (esophageal and stomach surgery), bariatric surgery, breast surgery, and pancreatic surgery.
The patient data were extracted by reviewing all discharge letters from that period taken from the digital archives.
Overall, 517 patients were admitted over this period, some repeatedly, leading to a total of 817 admissions. These 517 patients underwent 463 operations. The complications of these operations were then rated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (Table 1). For easier use, the suffix “d” for permanent disability was not drawn upon.

Clavien-Dindo classification

GradeDefinition
Grade IAny deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment, or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions.Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics and electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside
Grade IIRequiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications.Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included
Grade IIIRequiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention
Grade IIIaIntervention not under general anesthesia
Grade IIIbIntervention under general anesthesia
Grade IVLife-threatening complication (including central nervous system complications) requiring IC/ICU management
Grade IVaSingle organ dysfunction (including dialysis)
Grade IVbMultiorgan dysfunction
Grade VDeath of a patient

According to Dindo et al. [6 (link)]

IC intermediate care, ICU intensive care unit

The operations were sorted according to the complexity ranking (eight groups) in the accounting system of the Austrian Chamber of Physicians (Table 2; [8 ]).

Operation groups (complexity according to the Austrian Chamber of Physicians)

Operation groupExamples
IAbscess incisions, secondary sutures, proctoscopy, skin biopsy
IIExcisions of atheromas, fibromas, lipomas, incisions of anal abscesses
IIIToe amputation, small lymph node extirpation, thoracic drainage, colonoscopy
IVTracheotomy, appendectomy, hernia operation, colostomy, gastrostomy, ERCP
VGastroenterostomy, interventions for recurrent hernia, Cimino fistula, radical varicose vein stripping
VIStrumectomy, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, hemicolectomy, reduction mammoplasty
VIIPartial pancreatectomy, subtotal colectomy, subsegmental and large liver resections
VIIIEsophageal resection, open surgery of aortic aneurysms, organ transplantation
Publication 2018
Amputation Antiemetics Antipyretics Anus Aortic Aneurysm Appendectomy Atheroma Bariatric Surgery Blood Transfusion Central Nervous System Cholecystectomy Colectomy Colostomy Dialysis Disabled Persons Diuretics Drainage Electrolytes Endocrine Surgical Procedures Fibroma Fingers Fistula Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedure Gastrostomy Hemicolectomy Hepatectomy Hernia Intensive Care Lipoma Lymph Node Excision Operative Surgical Procedures Organ Transplantation Pancreas Pancreatectomy Parenteral Nutrition, Total Patient Discharge Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Pharmacotherapy Physicians Proctoscopy Skin Splenectomy Stomach Surgical Endoscopy Surgical Wound Sutures Therapeutics Therapy, Physical Thoracic Surgical Procedures Treatment Protocols Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Varices Wound Infection X-Rays, Diagnostic
We constructed a sample consisting of patients who underwent 1 of 11 surgical procedures during the sample period: total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, open appendectomy, cesarean delivery, FESS, cataract surgery, transurethral prostate resection (TURP), or simple mastectomy. We chose these procedures because they are commonly performed. In addition, with the exception of TKA and THA, these procedures are not indicated to relieve pain and are not thought to place patients at risk for long-term pain. We identified patients who underwent these procedures by identifying inpatient or outpatient claims with a CPT code for the given procedure (eTable 1 in the Supplement). We restricted our analysis to patients aged 18 to 64 years who were continuously enrolled for a period of at least 3 calendar years, encompassing the year before the procedure and the year after. For example, for patients who received their procedure in 2003, we required that the patient be continuously enrolled for at least the time period January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2004. In addition, we excluded patients who underwent 2 or more of the 11 studied surgical procedures. Using data from pharmacy claims, we further restricted our analysis to opioid-naive patients, defined as patients who did not fill a prescription for an opioid in the 12 months prior to their procedure. A flowchart outlining the construction of the sample is provided in the eFigure in the Supplement.
Publication 2016
Appendectomy Cataract Extraction Cesarean Section Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Dietary Supplements Inpatient Knee Replacement Arthroplasty Laparoscopy Operative Surgical Procedures Opioids Outpatients Pain Patients Simple Mastectomy Total Hip Arthroplasty Transurethral Resection of Prostate
As in our prior 2 trials, potential participants with IBS were recruited through general advertisement (flyers, newspapers, public radio, posters on city busses, and targeted mailings to GI clinic patients) in a metropolitan area in the Pacific Northwest (United States). Interested adults were screened over the phone. Eligibility was assessed across the 5-week baseline assessment (initial interview and 4-week diary). During the last 2 weeks of this assessment period, preselected candidate biomarkers were obtained. The criteria for inclusion specified men and women 18–70 years of age. In addition, participants had to have a history of IBS symptoms for at least 6 months prior to their IBS diagnosis and for at least 6 months after their diagnosis by a healthcare provider. They had to meet the Rome-III research criteria.17 Adults age 50 or older had to have a negative colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, abdominal ultrasonography, or barium enema. Anyone with a “red flag” symptom (eg, lost 10 lbs without trying, blood in stool - except blood due to hemorrhoids) was referred to their healthcare provider for further evaluation (eg, colonoscopy).
Potential participants were excluded if they were taking the following medications: antibiotics, corticosteroids, daily use of anticholinergics, tricyclic antidepressants, calcium-channel blockers; had a medical history of abdominal surgery (except appendectomy, Cae-sarian section, tubal ligation, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, or abdominal wall hernia repair); organic GI disease, celiac disease, or a moderate to severe pain condition (eg, low back pain and fibromyalgia); diabetes, current mental health disorders (psychosis, bipolar disorder, or moderate to severe depressive episodes, recent suicide attempt or drug or alcohol abuse or dependence); cardiac valve or conduction defects, immune-compromised disorders (eg, autoimmune conditions) or women who were pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to get pregnant in the next year (Figure).
Publication 2016
Abdomen Abdominoplasty Abuse, Alcohol Adrenal Cortex Hormones Adult Antibiotics Anticholinergic Agents Appendectomy Autoimmune Diseases Barium Enema Biological Markers Bipolar Disorder BLOOD Calcium Channel Blockers Cardiac Conduction System Disease Celiac Disease Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Colonoscopy Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis Eligibility Determination Feces Fibromyalgia Gastrointestinal Diseases Health Personnel Heart Valves Hemorrhoids Hernia Hysterectomy Immune System Diseases Low Back Pain Mental Disorders Pain Disorder Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Proctosigmoidoscopy Psychotic Disorders Suicide Attempt Tricyclic Antidepressive Agents Tubal Ligation Ultrasonography Woman

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2012
Aftercare Appendectomy Cholecystectomy Choledochoduodenostomy Duodenum Gastrostomy Head Heparin Human Body Intubation, Gastrointestinal Jejunostomy Liver Lovenox Medical Devices Operative Surgical Procedures Pancreas Pancreatectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients Peritoneal Cavity Portal Pressure Pressure Pylorus Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Roux-en-Y Anastomosis Spleen Splenic Artery Stomach Surgeons Tail Tissues Veins, Portal Veins, Splenic

Most recents protocols related to «Appendectomy»

This study was conducted over 2 years (March 2020–January 2022) at a large urban tertiary center. After obtaining approval from the institutional review board (IRB#2022/02-47), the medical records of the patients (1–18 years old) with MIS-C and acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, two groups as MIS-C (Group A) and acute appendicitis (Group B) were constituted. Group A included children diagnosed with MIS-C with gastrointestinal involvement. Patients with incomplete medical records, those without complaints of abdominal pain, and who underwent appendectomy before admission were excluded from Group A. Group B included children who underwent surgery for appendicitis. The existence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and lymphocytes in the appendiceal specimen was considered positive for AA. Patients who diagnosed as uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis were included. Patients who had negative appendectomy (defined as the absence of inflammatory cells in the appendiceal sample) and those with missing data (whose preoperative assessment did not include the parameters used to distinguish MIS-C in this study) were excluded from Group B.
Publication 2023
Abdominal Pain Appendectomy Appendicitis Cells Child Granulocyte Inflammation Lymphocyte Operative Surgical Procedures Patients
The trial is designed as a randomized, controlled, single center no inferiority trial with two parallel groups and a primary endpoint of localization accuracy during laparoscopic colectomy, which will take place in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China (Fig. 1). The participants will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1) by the reception oncologist. Eligible patients will be invited for study participation at their first visit at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The doctor who sees the patient will give a formal and detailed description of the study and its procedures. Upon the acquisition of patient written informed consent form, patients will undergo assessment.

Key inclusion and exclusion criteria of the trial

Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria

• Age from 18 to 80 years

• Large lateral spreading tumors that could not be treated endoscopically, malignant polyps treated endoscopically that required additional colorectal resection, and serosa-negative malignant colorectal tumors (≤ cT3)

• The tumor located in the colon, middle and high rectum (The lower edge of the tumor located above the peritoneal reflexes)

• No distant metastasis

• American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) class I-III

• Performance status of 0 or 1 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG)

• Written informed consent

• BMI > 35 kg/m2

• Previous history of gastrointestinal surgery that altered the gastrointestinal anatomy.

• Pregnant or lactating women

• Severe mental disorder

• History of previous abdominal surgery (except cholecystectomy and appendectomy)

• Rejection of laparoscopic resection

• History of cerebrovascular accident within the past six months

• History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months

• History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy

• Comorbidity of emergent conditions like obstruction, bleeding or perforation.

• Needing simultaneous surgery for other diseases.

After completing an initial assessment and signing an informed consent form, participants will be randomized with 1:1 ratio into two groups: autologous blood marker group and intraoperative colonoscopy group. The data manager, who will not be involved in eligibility assessment and recruitment of patients, will perform the randomization with a list of randomly ordered treatment identifiers generated by a permuted block design using SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc.). Although it will not be feasible to blind the surgeons and participants, the researcher performing the statistical analyses will be blinded to the patient group allocation.
This protocol and the informed consent forms have been reviewed and approved by Shanghai East Hospital and Institute Ethics Review Committee. We will obtain a new approval from the Committee if any amendments are made to the protocol or the informed consent form that may have an impact on the conduct of the study or potential benefit of the patient. A signed consent must be obtained from every participant in the ancillary study, if the data collection/request is not covered in the original informed consent process for the main clinical trial. The study has been registered in Clinical-Trial.gov (NCT05597384).
Publication 2023
Abdomen Angina, Unstable Appendectomy Cerebrovascular Accident Cholecystectomy Colectomy Colon Colonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasms concomitant disease Eligibility Determination Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedure Laparoscopy Mental Disorders, Severe Myocardial Infarction Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasms Oncologists Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Peritoneum Physicians Polyps Radiotherapy Rectum Reflex Serous Membrane Surgeons Vision Woman
This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for cholecystolithiasis plus choledocholithiasis at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Tongling People’s Hospital from January 2017 to March 2021.
The inclusion criteria for the study include patients who had (1) a diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis plus choledocholithiasis by preoperative imaging examination and postoperative pathology and (2) who underwent LCBDPSENBD or LCBDTD or LCERCP surgery. The patients who underwent laparotomy underwent other surgeries (such as liver resection, appendectomy, etc.) simultaneously or with incomplete data were excluded.
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) suggests offering stone extraction to all patients with CBD stones. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends a convergent ERCP for cholecystectomy in patients with CBD stones. Intraoperative ERCP can be performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a first-stage treatment for cholecystocholithiasis or after the failure of preoperative endoscopic attempts to remove CBDS. Guidelines recommend laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 weeks of ERCP in patients with CBD stones to reduce the rate of outcome and the risk of biliary event recurrence. In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, choledochoscope exploration of the CBD is a safe and effective technique for CBD stone clearance.22 (link) According to the guideline, we divided patients into 3 groups randomly.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongling People’s Hospital (2021004). The requirement for patients’ informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Publication 2023
Appendectomy Calculi Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Cholecystolithiasis Choledocholithiasis Diagnosis Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Ethics Committees, Clinical Europeans Hepatectomy Laparotomy Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Recurrence Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopic
This study began after obtaining the study approval from the ethics committee of our hospital (Ethics committee decision no. 2021.04.35; dated: April 28, 2021). The study was conducted retrospectively and in a single center. The study was conducted between May 1, 2021, and May 1, 2022, with patients who were admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain, diagnosed with AA, and met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Demographic data, medical history, WBC, platelet count, neutrophil count, SIII values, Alvarado scores, AAS, and pathology results of appendectomy material were retrieved from the hospital automation system [Hospital Information Management System (HIMS)] and recorded in the case form. The Alvarado score is a diagnostic score that is based on the symptoms (migratory pain, anorexia, nausea, and/or vomiting), signs (tenderness, rebound tenderness, and elevated body temperature), and laboratory findings (leukocytosis and left shift). One point was given to the presence of each indicator, except 2 points for tenderness and leukocytosis, making a total score of 10. AA cases were divided into two groups as complicated appendicitis and non-complicated appendicitis based on the presence of complications (gangrenous, perforated, and abscess formation). The study included 150 confirmed cases of AA and 150 control cases who were admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain and not diagnosed with AA.
Study group patients with confirmed AA diagnosis and control group patients who were not diagnosed with AA after being admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain were included in the study. In all, 3 patients under the age of 18 years, 5 pregnant patients, and 12 patients with missing data were excluded from the study. Also, 10 patients whose outcome could not be followed and whose medical history was unknown were not included in the study. In addition, 12 patients with any medical history of malignancy, a history of hematological disease, bone marrow pathology, and those taking anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs were also excluded from the study. In addition, patients with non-appendicitis infection focus were excluded from the study.
Publication 2023
Abdominal Pain Abscess Anorexia Anti-Inflammatory Agents Appendectomy Appendicitis Bone Marrow Ethics Committees Ethics Committees, Clinical Fever Focal Infection Gangrene Hematological Disease Immunosuppressive Agents Leukocytosis Malignant Neoplasms Nausea Neutrophil Pain, Migratory Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Platelet Counts, Blood SKP1 protein, human Tests, Diagnostic
This retrospective cohort study enrolled consecutive paediatric patients that
underwent appendectomy at the Department of General Surgery, Division of
Paediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
between January 2017 and December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows:
(i) patients aged between 6 months and 18 years; (ii) patients that underwent
appendectomy. Surgeries were conducted by the same team and patients were
retrospectively categorized into two groups; patients in group 1 did not
experience the use of enhanced recovery concepts (ERCs) during their
appendectomies; and patients in group 2 had ERCs applied during their
appendectomies. The ERAS protocols were adapted from the adult guidelines as
there is a lack of sufficient data or guidelines on paediatric protocols for
enhanced recovery. The use of these protocols was supported by their successful
implementation in paediatric patients undergoing GI surgeries described in
previous studies.3 (link)7 (link, link, link, link)The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of
Jordan, Amman, Jordan (no. IRB: 67/2019/6216). All procedures were undertaken
following the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and the
1964 Helsinki declaration as well as its later amendments. All applicable
international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care of patients
were followed. Written informed consent was obtained from all the parents and/or
legal guardians of the study participants. The data from each patient were
obtained from the hospital medical records and consents were signed by the
parents of the patients on the day of the operation. All personal details were
deidentified. The reporting of this study conforms to STROBE
guidelines.12 (link)
Publication 2023
Adult Appendectomy estrogen receptor alpha, human Institutional Ethics Committees Legal Guardians Operative Surgical Procedures Parent Patients Surgery, Day

Top products related to «Appendectomy»

Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Spain, Denmark, Austria
SPSS v21 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed to analyze and manipulate data, providing a range of statistical tools and techniques for researchers and analysts. The software offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of data management and analysis capabilities.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, China, Belgium, Austria, France
SPSS v22 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides tools for data analysis, data management, and data visualization. The software is primarily used for conducting advanced statistical analysis on a variety of data types.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Austria, Germany
SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and visualization.
Sourced in United States, Japan
The BD Multitest 6-color TBNK reagent is a laboratory product designed for the identification and enumeration of T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells in human whole blood samples. It provides a comprehensive panel of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to facilitate the detection and analysis of these cell populations.
Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Cameroon, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Belgium, Israel, Denmark, Australia, New Caledonia, France, Argentina, Sweden, Ireland, India
SAS version 9.4 is a statistical software package. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to help users extract insights from data and make informed decisions.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Austria, China, Spain, Ireland
SPSS version 24 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, including techniques for descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and predictive modeling. The software is designed to help users interpret data, identify trends, and make informed decisions based on statistical insights.
Infinicyt™ Software is a data analysis platform designed for flow cytometry applications. It provides users with tools to visualize, analyze, and manage data generated from flow cytometry instruments.
Sourced in United States
The Endoloop is a surgical instrument designed for laparoscopic procedures. It is used to place sutures or ligatures around tissue structures, such as blood vessels or organ appendages, to temporarily or permanently occlude them. The Endoloop provides a secure loop that can be tightened and released as needed during the surgical procedure.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Japan, France, China, Australia, Italy, Spain, Canada, Switzerland, Sweden, Brazil, India, Mexico, Austria
The FACSCanto II is a flow cytometer manufactured by BD. It is a versatile instrument designed for multicolor flow cytometric analysis. The FACSCanto II can detect and analyze various properties of cells or particles suspended in a fluid as they flow through the system.
Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Australia, France
R version 3.6.1 is a statistical computing and graphics software package. It is an open-source implementation of the S programming language and environment. R version 3.6.1 provides a wide range of statistical and graphical techniques, including linear and nonlinear modeling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification, clustering, and more.

More about "Appendectomy"

Appendectomy is a common surgical procedure to remove the appendix, a small pouch attached to the first part of the large intestine.
This operation is frequently performed to treat appendicitis, an inflammation of the appendix.
Appendectomy is one of the most commonly conducted abdominal surgeries, with well-established techniques and protocols.
Researchers can utilize PubCompare.ai's advanced AI-driven platform to efficiently locate and compare appendectomy protocols from a wide range of sources, including literature, preprints, and patents.
This enhances research efficiency and confidence in identifying the most accurate and reproducible methods.
Key subtopics related to appendectomy include the anatomy and function of the appendix, the causes and symptoms of appendicitis, the surgical approach and techniques for appendectomy, and the post-operative care and recovery process.
Relevant software and technologies that can assist in appendectomy research and analysis include SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) versions 21, 22, 24, and 25, SAS (Statistical Analysis System) version 9.4, Infinicyt™ Software for flow cytometry data analysis, and the FACSCanto II flow cytometer.
Addiotnal terms associated with appendectomy include 'appendicular', 'cecum', 'laparoscopic appendectomy', 'open appendectomy', 'Endoloop', and 'BD Multitest 6-color TBNK reagent' for flow cytometry analysis.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai's AI capabilities to streamline their appendectomy research, gaining enhanced efficiency and confidence in identifying the most accurate and reproducible protocols from the available literature, preprints, and patents.