Caloric Restriction
It has been shown to extend lifespan and improve health outcomes in numerous studies across various species.
PubCompare.ai leverages AI-driven comparisons to help researchers optimize caloric restriction protocols and products, enhancing reproducibility and accuracy for your research findings.
Discover the power of PubCompare.ai and take your caloric restriction studies to the next levle.
Most cited protocols related to «Caloric Restriction»
The percentage of consumed Artemia was estimated by counting Artemia before and after feeding. Briefly, 1 mL of water was collected from 1700 mL of water containing freshly hatched Artemia corresponding to 100 or 8.5 mg cysts. The numbers of hatched Artemia were counted three times to determine a mean count. After counting, the samples were returned to the 2-L tank. Then, five fish were transferred to the tank for feeding. After 2 hours, the number of Artemia was counted as before feeding. Zebrafish fed 5 or 60 mg of Artemia per day consumed about 80 or 50% of the provided Artemia, respectively. Zebrafish fed 2.5 mg of Artemia per day consumed almost all of the provided Artemia.
After providing information about the study and obtaining signed consent to participate, along with permission to collect demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical data, including blood and stool samples, each participant was given an appointment to undergo a full assessment at the study clinic. All appointments were booked during the morning period, in which samples were collected at the same time on one day. Participants had the option to withdraw at any stage of the study.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee of the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University (IRB #E-19-3625), and all methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Most recents protocols related to «Caloric Restriction»
Example 8
The session was held at the Nutrition Clinic of the Buraydah Central Hospital. A very low carbohydrate or ketogenic diet with caloric restriction was used as the experimental intervention. At the start of the intervention, all participants attended a two-hour lecture about a KD, nutritional composition, the proper times to eat, and the beneficial effects of a KD, as well as an educational session about their prescribed diet plan. The participants were given a list of very low-carbohydrate foods to choose from in order to consume 20 g of carbohydrates per day. They were provided with a typical plan and a menu for all main dishes, snacks, and drinks allowed for seven days, with instructions to limit their carbohydrate intake to 5–10% of energy intake (EI) and to derive at least 75% of it from fat, incorporate a protein intake of 20%, and follow a very low-energy diet with a deliberate caloric deficit (1200–1500 kcal). Unlimited quantities of meat, poultry, fish, shellfish, and eggs were permitted, as were two cups of salad and vegetables per day, one cup of low-carbohydrate vegetables per day, four ounces of hard cheese, and limited amounts of cream, avocado, olives, and lemon juice. Transformed fats were prohibited, but fats and oils were not. Detailed explanations of how to apply the KD principles in practice and appropriate tracking and monitoring procedures were provided. The participants were instructed not to use drugs or antioxidants to eliminate the possibility of confounding effects. BHB levels were measured weekly to assess adherence to the dietary regimen.