We began with a database of 282 patients who participated in a mailed survey to colorectal cancer patients 18 years or older. Participants were at least 5 years since diagnosis and were members of Kaiser Permanente, residing in either Oregon, Southwest Washington state, or Northern California. Details regarding this original study may be found elsewhere (R. S. Krouse, et al., 2009 (
link)). Results of the survey included an overall quality of life score on the City of Hope Quality of Life- Ostomy Questionnaire (R. S. Krouse, et al., 2009 (
link); Mohler, et al., 2008 (
link)). We contacted subjects who successfully adapted (in the highest HRQOL quartile, High-QOL), as well as those who were extremely challenged with stomal issues (in the lowest HRQOL quartile, Low-QOL). Potential participants were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss challenges and adjustments to living with an ostomy. We divided the focus groups by gender, based on evidence that challenges and adjustment to an ostomy have demonstrated gender differences in previous studies (Baider, Perez, & Kaplan De-Nour, 1989 (
link); Baldwin, et al., 2009 (
link); Fernsler, Klemm, & Miller, 1999 (
link); Forsberg & Cedermark, 1996 (
link); R. S. Krouse, et al., 2009 (
link); Salkeld, Solomon, Short, & Butow, 2004 (
link)). Our goal was to recruit four to eight participants for each gender/QOL-based focus group to provide adequate “saturation” (the point at which the moderator is hearing the same issues repeated with no new ideas arising). A total of eight focus groups were formed based and high vs. low QOL and gender.
Focus groups were audio recorded for later transcription. A discussion guide, with a series of open-ended questions, was used to elicit a broad spectrum of issues. We began with a discussion of individual cancer treatments and surgeries and then preceded to questions on care, adjustment, and various ostomy concerns. All study procedures and protocols were approved by the Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Northern California Review Boards.
Prompts in the discussion guide were used to focus the moderator on topics to be discussed under that question, and for the moderator to use if the topic did not arise spontaneously. The group facilitator (MG) for each session was experienced in this role. In addition, there was a silent recorder (RK), who observed and took notes throughout each focus group in order to record participants' statements to help clarify transcriptions and document field observations regarding participant behavior (e.g., early or late arrival time; demeanor in responding to focus group topics) and unobtrusive measures (e.g., manner of dress for the focus groups). Each focus group lasted approximately two hours, providing sufficient time for each group to cover the questions on the focus group guide. Elaboration on some topics varied across groups, but all groups consistently addressed all topics on the guide. Focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim for qualitative analysis, with the exception that names were replaced by a focus group ID number.
The focus group recordings were transcribed as rich text format, and we analyzed content using HyperRESEARCH (Copyright 1997–2007, ResearchWare, Inc., Randolph, MA, USA). Because the goal of this analysis was to uncover HRQOL related-concerns across defined domains of HRQOL, analysis followed a directed content analysis approach based on the City of Hope four-dimensional framework. (Grant, et al., 2004 (
link); Hsieh & Shannon, 2005 (
link)) Two clinical investigators trained in qualitative analysis reviewed all focus-group transcripts to identify themes for categorizing ostomy-related HRQOL discussions into domains of the City of Hope model (Grant, et al., 2004 (
link); R. Krouse, et al., 2007 (
link)). These include physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being. We then positioned relevant comments within the themes (
Figure 1). Two investigators completed a final validation review to ensure consistency and clarity across all data. Selections that were discordantly coded (10–15%) were discussed in order to further refine and come to consensus on coding.
Grant M., McMullen C.K., Altschuler A., Mohler M.J., Hornbrook M.C., Herrinton L.J., Wendel C.S., Baldwin C.M, & Krouse R.S. (2011). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG LONG-TERM COLORECTAL CANCER SURVIVORS WITH OSTOMIES. Oncology nursing forum, 38(5), 587-596.