Suction Drainage
This process is commonly employed in various medical procedures, such as wound management, surgical site care, and fluid management.
Suction Drainage helps to promote healing, prevent infection, and improve patient outcomes by effectively removing unwanted substances.
Understanding the optimal protocols and products for Suction Drainage is crucial for healthcare professionals to ensure reproducibility, accuracy, and patient safety.
Leveraging AI-powered comparisons can assist in identifying the best available Suction Drainage research protocols and products from the literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the overall quality and effectiveness of this medical intervention.
Most cited protocols related to «Suction Drainage»
As an alternative to immuno-staining, in some experiments we revealed plaques as areas of destroyed cells. To this end, after removing the overlays, we stained the cells with 1% crystal violet solution in 20% methanol in water.
Most recents protocols related to «Suction Drainage»
Example 3
The present example demonstrates the preparation of a particular fluid collection container with a RBC flocculant.
Blood Containing Liquid Collection Container. The fluid collection container used in the following examples was a 1200-ml suction canister, shown in
Flocculant—PolyDADMAC. Kemira's “Superfloc™ C-591” was used as the source of polyDADMAC. The quality or purity of this product was not consistent. Therefore, the Sigma-Aldrich version of high-molecular weight (200-350 KDa) 20% polyDADMAC (Sigma Catalog #409022) was used. The results indicate that the Sigma version of polyDADMAC significantly improve the testing results. However, it is anticipated that virtually any number of different sources flocculants may be used in the practice of the present invention, as well as in the fabrication of the herein described flocculant containing and treated fluid collection containers.
Example 1
In this example, the oligopeptide FTLE in chili pepper seeds was extracted as follows:
1) deseeding: fresh chili peppers were taken, and the flesh was separated from the seeds to obtain chili pepper seeds;
2) pulverizing: the chili pepper seeds were pulverized and sieved by an 80 mesh to obtain chili pepper seed powder ;
3) degreasing: the chili pepper seed powder was mixed with n-hexane at a ratio of 1:10 (g/ml); the mixture was stirred and degreased overnight; n-hexane was removed by suction filtration after the degreasing was completed to obtain a chili pepper seed meal;
4) protein extraction: the degreased chili pepper seed meal was dissolved in water at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v, g/mL); the pH value of the solution was adjusted to 9.5 with a NaOH solution to conduct dissolving for 4 h; then the pH value of the solution was adjusted to 4.5 with HCl to conduct precipitating for 2 h; the reaction solution was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 20 min, and the precipitate was collected as a crude protein extract;
5) ultra-high pressure assisted enzymolysis: the protein isolated was dissolved in water, and was subjected to an ultra-high pressure treatment at 300 MPa for 30 min; then the product obtained by the ultra-high pressure treatment was subjected to an enzymolysis treatment, in which the enzyme was Bacillus licheniformis, the mass ratio of the enzyme to the substrate was 1:20 (w/w, g/g), the temperature was 40° C., the pH value was adjusted to 8 with 1 mol/L NaOH, and the enzymolysis treatment was performed for 3 h;
6) enzyme inactivation: at the end of the enzymolysis, the enzyme was inactivated at 90° C. for 10 min to obtain a chili pepper seed zymolyte solution;
7) isolation and purification of zymolyte: the chili pepper seed zymolyte solution was passed through a DEAE anion chromatography column, where the mobile phase included deionized water and NaCl; the eluent in a periodfrom 35 min to 45 min was collected; then, isolation and purification were conducted by an ODS-A reverse phase C18 column (hydrophobic column), where the mobile phase included deionized water and 50% methanol, and the eluent in a periodfrom 75 min to 90 min was collected. The peptide fragments in the obtained eluate were subjected to mass spectrometry identification analysis, and information of multiple peptide sequences was obtained.
Example 2
Chemical systhesis was conducted in accordance with the peptide sequences obtained by mass spectrometry identification analysis of Example 1 to obtain synthetic peptides. The effect of each peptide on HepG2 cell proliferation was studied, and the specific steps were as follows:
1) HepG2 cell culture: hepG2 cells were obtained from the ATCC cell bank and were cultured in a DMEM medium containing 10% FBS at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 cell incubator. Cells were cultured in a 25 cm 2 flask, passaged when cells were grown to a density of 70% to 90%, and seeded in a 96-well plate.
2) Peptide fragment treatment: after 24 hours of cell culture in the 96-well plate, the original DMEM medium was aspirated from the wells. DMEM containing peptide fragments at concentrations of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 mM were added to each well to continue culturing for 24 hours.
3) Cell proliferation rate measured by MTT method: MTT at a concentration of 5 mg/mL was added to a 96-well plate in 20 μL per well. After incubation for 4 hours, the liquid was aspirated from each well. 150 μL DMSO was added to each well. The absorbance was measured after reacting for 20 min.
The results are shown in the figure. It can be seen that the oligopeptide FTLE has a better HepG2 cell inhibition rate than other oligopeptides, which is helpful for the prevention or treatment of liver cancer.
In the description of this specification, descriptions with reference to the terms “one embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “example”, “specific examples”, or “some examples”, etc. mean that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the present disclosure. In this description, schematic representations of the terms above do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples. The different embodiments or examples and the features of the different embodiments or examples described in this description can be integrated and combined by a person skilled in the art without contradicting each other.
While embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it will be understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive and that changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations may be made to the embodiments by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Example 1
It is assumed that the sample 13 initially only contains as initial gas a mixture of CO2+NO2 without O2, but in too small a quantity to be able to suck this mixture into the device 1 filling all of the suction path: it is thus impossible to determine the proportions of CO2 and of NO2 in this case. On the other hand, if O2 originating from the source 19 is introduced into the sample 13 via the dilution path, then the sample 13 contains a mixture of CO2+NO2+O2 in a quantity sufficient to take measurements. The proportion of CO2, NO2, and O2 can be determined after dilution as described previously. The proportion of CO2 and of NO2 before the dilution can then be deduced therefrom.
For example, if the following are measured:
Proportion CO2+NO2=20% of the gas to be analyzed after dilution
Proportion NO2=5% of the gas to be analyzed after dilution
Then the following are deduced therefrom:
Proportion O2=100−Proportion CO2+NO2=80% of the gas to be analyzed after dilution
Proportion CO2=15% of the gas to be analyzed after dilution
I.e.:
Proportion NO2=25% of the initial gas before dilution
Proportion CO2=75% of the initial gas before dilution
After sample collection, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) combined with miRNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA quality and integrity were measured using Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent 4200 TapeStation.
Top products related to «Suction Drainage»
More about "Suction Drainage"
This process is commonly utilized in various medical procedures, such as wound management, surgical site care, and fluid management.
Suction Drainage helps to promote healing, prevent infection, and improve patient outcomes by effectively removing unwanted substances.
Understanding the optimal protocols and products for Suction Drainage is crucial for healthcare professionals to ensure reproducibility, accuracy, and patient safety.
Leveraging AI-powered comparisons can assist in identifying the best available Suction Drainage research protocols and products from the literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the overall quality and effectiveness of this medical intervention.
The PubCompare.ai platform can be a valuable tool in optimizing Suction Drainage research protocols.
By utilizing AI-powered comparisons, researchers can locate and identify the best protocols and products from a wealth of information sources, including scientific literature, preprints, and patents.
This can help to ensure that Suction Drainage procedures are performed with maximum reproducibility and accuracy, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.
In addition to Suction Drainage, healthcare professionals may also utilize specialized equipment and software to enhance their research and clinical practice.
Tools like the PClamp 10 software, Multiclamp 700B amplifier, VisuMax, Digidata 1440A, GF-UCT260, Spike2 software, MATLAB, Axopatch 200B amplifier, Model 1700, and Digidata 1322A can provide valuable data acquisition, analysis, and visualization capabilities, further supporting the optimization of Suction Drainage and other medical interventions.
By leveraging the insights and resources available through PubCompare.ai and various specialized software and equipment, healthcare professionals can elevate their Suction Drainage research and clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient care and improved outcomes.