The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti dig alkaline phosphatase fab fragments

Manufactured by Roche

Anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments are a type of laboratory equipment used for the detection and quantification of target molecules in various biological assays. These Fab fragments are designed to bind specifically to digoxigenin (DIG) and are conjugated with the enzyme alkaline phosphatase. This combination allows for the sensitive and reliable detection of DIG-labeled target molecules through colorimetric or chemiluminescent signaling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using anti dig alkaline phosphatase fab fragments

1

In situ RNA hybridization protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atthog specific primers were designed using the program Primer3 (Fwd: 5’-acacgtgtgtgctgaaaagc-3’ and Rev: 5’- gagattaaccctcactaaagggatgagcaggtaacccatctcc-3’).’ The underlined sequence marks the T3 polymerase binding site incorporated into the reverse primer. The Atthog probe was generated using a Digoxigenin (DIG) RNA Labeling Kit (Roche). Briefly, the probe was generated from the in vitro transcription of PCR products amplified from mouse neural progenitor cell cDNA. After overnight hybridization at 70 °C , the signal was visualized using anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase (AP) Fab fragments (Roche) and NBT/BCIP (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Pax7 in axolotl

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As a positive control for the produced Pax7 RNA probes, whole-mount ISH in embryos was performed according to the procedure described by Harland [22 (link)]. Briefly, axolotl embryos were fixed overnight at room temperature in MEMFA buffer (0.1 M MOPS, pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4, and 3.7% formaldehyde) and treated with proteinase K (20 μg/mL) at 4°C for 30 min and 37°C for 15 min. To reduce the background, embryos were reacted in 0.1 M triethanolamine buffer for 5 min, and to make the tissue transparent, embryos were bleached in 3% hydrogen peroxide. Subsequently, the embryos were hybridized in a prehybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5× SSC, 50 μg/mL yeast RNA, 50 μg/mL heparin, and 1% SDS in 50 mL of DEPC water) containing the probe (5–10 μg/mL) at 60°C overnight. After hybridization, the DIG-labeled probes were detected using anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase (AP) Fab fragments (Roche), and reaction color was developed using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP) and 4-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) dissolved in AP buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Embryos were cleaned in 70% glycerol for 5 h at room temperature or at 4°C overnight and then photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Situ Hybridization of Atthog in Mouse Neural Progenitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atthog specific primers were designed using the program Primer3 (Fwd: 5’-acacgtgtgtgctgaaaagc-3’ and Rev: 5’- gagattaaccctcactaaagggatgagcaggtaacccatctcc-3’).’ The underlined sequence marks the T3 polymerase binding site incorporated into the reverse primer. The Atthog probe was generated using a Digoxigenin (DIG) RNA Labeling Kit (Roche). Briefly, the probe was generated from the in vitro transcription of PCR products amplified from mouse neural progenitor cell cDNA. After overnight hybridization at 70°C, the signal was visualized using anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase (AP) Fab fragments (Roche) and NBT/BCIP (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Situ Hybridization of Mosmo Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described (Pusapati et al., 2018 (link)), to generate a Mosmo in situ probe, Mosmo specific primers were designed using the program Primer3: forward 5′-acacgtgtgtgctgaaaagc-3′ and reverse 5′-gagattaaccctcactaaagggatgagcaggtaacccatctcc-3′. The underlined sequence marks the T3 polymerase binding site that was incorporated into the reverse primer. The Mosmo probe was generated using a digoxigenin (DIG) RNA Labeling Kit (Roche). Briefly, the probe was generated from the in vitro transcription of PCR products amplified from mouse neural progenitor cell cDNA. After overnight hybridization at 65°C, the signal was visualized using Anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase (AP) Fab fragments (Roche) and NBT/BCIP (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Situ Hybridization of Chd8 in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA in situ hybridization on the mouse brain sections was performed with digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes. Full-length cDNA of Chd8 was amplified with specific PCR primers and cloned into a pGEM-T easy vector (Promega) to generate an antisense probe for Chd8. The DIG-labeled antisense probes were synthesized by in vitro transcription using SP6 RNA polymerase. Mice of different developmental stages were perfused with 4% PFA, and fixed brains were sectioned into 20-μm slices using a cryostat. RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described previously [26 (link)]. Brain sections were hybridized for 18 h at 60 °C. The hybridization signal was detected with anti-DIG–alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche) and nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) plus 5-bromo-4-chlor-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP) as color reaction substrates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA in situ Hybridization Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA in situ analyses were done essentially as described (Arenas-Mena et al., 2000 (link)). Briefly, embryos were hybridized with 0.1–0.5 ng/ul of DIG labeled RNA probe for 1 week at 50° C. Embryos were incubated with anti-DIG Alkaline Phosphatase FAB fragments overnight at room temperature (1:1500, Roche Diagnostics). After washing, embryos were stained with NBT/BCIP for 6–24 hours. The reaction was stopped with 5 mM EDTA in MOPS Buffer. Embryos were stored up to 1 day at 4° C and imaged on a Zeiss Axiovert 200M Microscope with an AxioCam MRc5 color camera. In all cases embryos were also incubated with the same concentration of Neomycin probe as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Situ Hybridization for LsMTP Transcript Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the in situ hybridization specificity, two different single stranded digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes of 476 bp and 604 bp lengths corresponding to different regions of LsMTP transcripts (Fig. 1) were synthesized separately from cDNA using the DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche). Primers used for the synthesis of sense and antisense RNA probes are listed in supplemental Table S1. The concentration and labeling efficiency of probes was assessed by spectrometry (Nanodrop ND-1000) and with a spot test on nylon membrane, respectively. In situ hybridization was carried out in paraffin-embedded sections of adult female lice, as previously described by Kvamme, Frost, and Nilsen (24 (link)) and Dalvin, Nilsen, and Skern-Mauritzen (25 ) with some modifications. Tissue sections were deparaffinized with Histoclear (National Diagnostic) instead of xylene and proteinase K treatment was done for 13 min. Hybridization of probes (500 ng/100 μl) was carried out at 65°C for 16–20 h. Sections were incubated with anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche) and visualized using nitroblue tetrazolium (Roche) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Roche). The localization of LsMTP transcripts was detected with antisense probes and sense probes were used as negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Northern Blot Analysis of tRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (1.5 μg) isolated from WT and MTU1 KO cells was separated with 7 M urea/TBE/15% PAGE at 150 V. The gel was then stained with SYBR Gold (Invitrogen) to assess the RNA quality and transferred to a nylon membrane (Millipore) by a wet transfer blotting system (Bio-Rad) on ice at 50 V for 80 min. The membrane was then crosslinked with UV light at 1200 × 100 mJ/cm2 (HL-2000 Hybrilinker, UVP), soaked in prehybridization buffer (6× SSC, 0.1% SDS and 1× Denhardt's Solution) and incubated in a 42°C water bath for 1 h. After incubation, the membrane was hybridized with DIG (Roche)-labeled tRNA probes in hybridization buffer (900 mM NaCl, 90 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 6 mM EDTA and 0.3% SDS) and incubated overnight at 50°C. The membrane was then washed with 1× SSC, blocked using a DIG wash and block buffer set (Roche), and detected with anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche) and CDP-Star (Roche). The membranes were imaged by ImageQuant (GE Healthcare). Probes used for northern blotting are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detecting CRMP2 and CRMP4 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNAs used as templates to make probes were prepared by RNA extraction and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The primers for RT-PCR were designed according to the Esembl genomic sequences [19 (link)]. In situ hybridization was performed as described previously [20 (link)] with minor modifications. Briefly, DIG-labeled riboprobes were incubated with the embryos to detect the expression pattern of CRMP2 and CRMP4. Anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and NBT/BCIP (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) were used to detect and amplify the signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detection of RNA Expression in Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single stranded Digoxigenin (DIG) labelled RNA probe of 571 nt was synthesized from cDNA using the DIG RNA labelling kit (Roche). Primers used for the synthesis of sense and antisense RNA probes are listed in Table 1. The concentration and quality of the probes were determined by spot test and spectrometry (Nanodrop ND-1000). In situ hybridization was performed in paraffin embedded sections of adult female lice and copepodids as previously described by Dalvin et al. [42 ] and Eichner et al. [43 (link)] with some modifications. Histoclear (National Diagnostic) was used to deparaffinize the sections and proteinase K treatment was carried out for 18 minutes. Sections were hybridized with DIG-labeled RNA probes (1500 ng/100μl) at 65°C for 20 hr. Afterward, sections were incubated with anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche) and visualized using the nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Roche). Sense probe was used as a negative control. Pictures were obtained with an Axio Scope.A1 microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!