The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using dimension fastscan afm

1

Supported Lipid Bilayers Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Image of the supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) was acquired on a Bruker AFM Dimension FastScan (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with NPG tips (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a spring constant of about 0.32 N/m (manufacturer data). An image was obtained at room temperature in Peak Force QNM mode, shortly after SLB formation. An image of 5 µm size was acquired at least for two different samples and two different areas per sample. Images were analyzed using Nanoscope Analysis (v140r2, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy of Supported Lipid Bilayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of the different supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) were acquired on a Bruker AFM Dimension FastScan (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with NPG tips (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with spring constant of about 0.32 N/m (manufacturer data). Images were obtained at room temperature in Peak Force QNM mode, shortly after SLB formation. Images of 5, 10 and 20µm size were acquired at least for two different samples and two different areas per sample. Images were analyzed using Nanoscope Analysis (v140r2). Depth analyses as well as profile analyses were made on each image to determine bilayers height and one section is presented per image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

AFM Imaging of Biotinylated DNA Origami

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for AFM imaging were first purified with 100-kDa Amicon spin filters and then incubated with 20-fold excess of streptavidin protein for 1 hour at room temperature. For AFM imaging, 10 μl of samples was deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica surface (Ted Pella, USA) for 1 min. The mica surface was then washed twice with 1× TAE/Mg2+ buffer using compressed air. After washing, 60 μl of 1× TAE/Mg2+ buffer and 2.5 μl of NiCl2 solution (0.2 M) were added. The samples were imaged in “ScanAsyst in Fluid” on the Dimension FastScan AFM with ScanAssyst Fluid+ probes (both from Bruker, USA). The 2-μm × 2-μm AFM images were scanned at a resolution of 1024 lines with 1024 pixels per line. We analyzed the patterns on around 200 origamis for the statistics of each temporal event.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were obtained using a Bruker Dimension FastScan AFM (Billerica, MA, USA) in knockdown mode. Optical images were obtained using a Sunwoo RX50M microscope (Yuyao, China). Transmission electron microscopy was performed with a 200 kV Talos F200S transmission electron microscope. Room-temperature Raman and PL spectra were recorded with a Horiba Raman microscope (Irvine, CA, USA) with 532 nm laser excitation. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the samples was carried out using a Thermo Scientific Kα XPS spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Exosporium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A suspension of exosporium fragments (Section 2.4) was incubated on freshly cleaved mica (Agar Scientific) for 20 min, then washed with 10 × 1 ml of HPLC grade water (Sigma Aldrich). Samples imaged in water were used without further preparation; samples imaged in air were blown dry with filtered nitrogen. Imaging in water was performed using a Dimension FastScan AFM (Bruker) and FastScan D probes (nominal force constant and resonant frequency 0.25 N/m and 110 kHz in water, respectively) in tapping mode with a free amplitude of approximately 1.2 nm and a set point of 80–90% of this value. Imaging in air was performed using a Multimode (Bruker) or NanoWizard® 3 (JPK) AFM in tapping mode using TESPA probes (Bruker) with a nominal force constant and resonant frequency of 40 N/m and 320 kHz, respectively. The free amplitude was approximately 8 nm and images were acquired with a set point 90–95%. In both environments, the feedback gains, scan rate, set point and Z range were adjusted for optimal image quality while scanning. Height and phase images were acquired simultaneously and processed (cropping, flattening, plane fitting) using NanoScope Analysis or JPK DP software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

AFM Imaging of Samples on Mica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For AFM imaging, the sample (5 μl) was deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica plate. After 10 min incubation at RT, the mica was rinsed and imaged in the same sample buffer. AFM imaging was performed by using Dimension FastScan AFM (Bruker AXS, Madison, WI, USA) with a silicon nitride cantilever with a spring constant of 0.06–0.14 N m−1 and resonant frequency of 98.5–140 kHz in water. Scanning was performed in the same buffer solution by using a tapping mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of MXene Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical absorption spectra of the dispersion sample were recorded on an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (V-770, JASCO). Raman spectra in the radial-breathing mode region were recorded on an inVia Raman Microscope (Renishaw) excited by 785-nm laser light. A single-monochromator micro-Raman spectrometer was employed in the back-scattering configuration. The sample dispersions were drop-casted onto a silicon wafer before the measurement. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained using an ESCALAB XI + spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using 300 W Al–Ka radiation. To exclude the substrate signals, a highly concentrated MXene dispersion was drop-coated several times onto a Si/SiO2 wafer to form a thick MXene film (>10 nm). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were acquired using a Dimension Fastscan AFM with a NanoScope V stage controller (Bruker). The samples for AFM observation were prepared by spin-coating the Si/SiO2 wafer with 10 µl of the MXene dispersion at 400 rpm for 60 s, followed by 1,000 rpm for 60 s and 1,600 rpm for 60 s. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were conducted in an S-4300 (Hitachi) or an ETHOS NX5000 (Hitachi). X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained by a SmartLab (Rigaku) through Cu Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force Microscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM scans and inspections were
performed in tapping mode on a Bruker Dimension FastScan AFM. Cantilevers
were chosen to have a tip radius of ∼7–10 nm, as confirmed
by SEM imaging. Using thermal and solid surface deflection calibration
we estimated the spring constant, k, for each cantilever.
We use cantilevers with spring constants of k = 30–40
N/m for thicker flakes (>12 nm) and k = 8–9
N/m for thinner ones (<12 nm). Each data point on the polar diagram
in Figure 3a is an
averaged value from fitting three to five force–deflection
curves obtained at the same position.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Protein Nanofibrils with AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for atomic force microscopy (AFM) were prepared by dilution (between 1 : 200 and 1 : 20 000) of the WPI samples in 10 mM HCl and then applied on freshly cleaved mica surfaces. After drying in air, the samples were investigated using a Dimension FastScan AFM (Bruker) operating in tapping mode. FastScan A cantilevers (Bruker) were used for the experiments and the images were investigated using Nanoscope 1.5 software. Control experiments were also performed in liquid using ScanAsyst liquid + cantilevers (Bruker) operating in peak force mode. These experiments showed the same difference between the morphologies of straight and curved PNFs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Atomic Force Microscopy of Polymer Envelopes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was carried out using a Bruker Dimension FastScan AFM using FastScan-D probes (Bruker—nominal k = 0.25 N/m, nominal cantilever length = 16 μm) in “Tapping Mode” (Amplitude Modulated Intermittent Contact Mode) driven at ~110 kHz with a free amplitude of ~1 nm.
All imaging of polymer envelopes (sacculi) was carried out in liquid (buffer) without drying at any point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!