The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fast super evagreen qpcr master mix

Manufactured by US Everbright
Sourced in China, United States

The Fast Super EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix is a ready-to-use solution for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reactions. It contains all the necessary components, including DNA polymerase, dNTPs, MgCl2, and the EvaGreen fluorescent dye, which binds to double-stranded DNA during amplification. The master mix is designed to provide fast and efficient qPCR results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using fast super evagreen qpcr master mix

1

Quantifying Gene Expression in Germinating Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from seed tissues from control and PEG-treated germinating seeds (for both wild-type Vp16 and mutant vp16) using Omini Plant RNA Kit (DNase I) (CWBIO, Beijing, China). Using HiFiscript cDNA Synthesis Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China), the extracted RNA was then reverse-transcribed in a 20 µL total volume as per manufacturer’ guidelines. Gene-specific primers for twenty-eight randomly selected DAPs (Table S9) were designed for qRT-PCR analysis using Primer Premier 5 software. The expression of these genes was studied by qRT-PCR in a C1000 (CFX96 Real-Time System) Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) using 2× Fast Super EvaGreen ® qPCR Mastermix (US Everbright Inc., city, CA, USA); GAPDH was used for housekeeping. Each 1 µL of cDNA template was mixed with 1 µL of each primer (50 pmol), 10 µL of 2× Fast Super EvaGreen ® qPCR Mastermix (US Everbright Inc., city, CA, USA) and 7 µL ddH2O in a 20 µL reaction mixture. The PCR schedule was run as follows: 95 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 55 °C for 30 s. The relative expression level of each gene was determined using Livak and Schmittgen’s cycle threshold (2–ΔΔCT) method [90 (link)], with three technical replications for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

qRT-PCR of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qRT-PCR was conducted using Fast SuperEvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (S2008S) (US Everbright Inc, SuZhou, China) following the method of Cao et al. (2022) [28 (link)]. The primer sequences are presented in Table S1 (see online supplementary material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zinc-Mediated Dopamine and Heparin Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dopamine (DA) and poly-lysine (PLL, MW 150–300 kDa) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Heparin sodium (Hep, MW < 8 KDa, potency > 160 Umg−1) was purchased from Shanghai Bioscience and Technology Co. ZnCl2 reagent was purchased from Chronchem (Chengdu, China). Zinquin ethyl ester was purchased from Maokangbio (Shanghai, China). A Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Japan). Fast Super Eva Green qPCR Master Mix was purchased from US Everbright (Suzhou, China). A Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA). Rabbit monoclonal anti-mouse α-SMA antibody and rabbit monoclonal anti-mouse CD31 antibody were purchased from Servicebio (China). Rabbit polyclonal to Metallothionein was purchased from Abcam (ab192385).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating RNA-seq Results via RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the RNA-seq results, we chose ten DEGs from the pathway analysis and quantified them using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In this step, leaf total RNA was extracted with three biological replicates as described above. The gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 [68 (link)], and their characteristics are listed in Table S1. PED1, one endogenous control gene, was selected as an internal standard. Two-step amplification with three technical replicates was performed using Fast Super EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright Inc., Suzhou, China) on a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR system (Qiagen, Germany). We calculated relative expression levels with the 2−∆∆Ct method [69 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating Differentially Expressed Genes by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qRT-PCR analysis was performed to validate the DEGs identified by transcriptome sequencing. Total RNA was extracted as described before. An UEIris II RT-PCR System was used for first-strand cDNA Synthesis (with dsDNase) (US Everbright, Suzhou, China). The PCR mixture contained 4 μL of UEIris II RT MasterMix (5X), 1 μL of dsDNase, 14 μL of RNase-free water, and 1 μg of mRNA template. The program was set at 37 °C for 2 min (removing genomic DNA from total RNAs) then 55 °C for 10 min, followed by 85 °C for 10 s. The qRT-PCR assays were performed using a Fast Super EvaGreen® qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright, Suzhou, China) in an ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, USA) with the following program: 95 °C for 2 min; 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 30 s, 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 60 s. The MrActin was selected as the endogenous reference. All the primers were synthesized by Invitrogen (Beijing, China) (Additional file 8: Table S8). A 20 μL of reaction mix contained 10 μL of 2 × Fast Super EvaGreen® Master Mix, 1 μL of 10 × ROX, 5.5 μL of ddH2O, 3 μL of cDNA, and 0.5 μg of each primer. The relative expression changes of the endogenous reference and the tested genes were analyzed by the 2- △△ CT method [76 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying IPA-producing gut bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gut bacteria genomes were isolated from equal weight of feces samples of control and acute groups with TIANamp Stool DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) as manufactory’s instruction. Six IPA-producing bacteria from literatures were quantified by qRT-PCR by using Fast super EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright Inc., United States) according to manufactory’s instruction. Primers were as follows (5′–3′): for Clostridium sporogenes: F: AAGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGG, R: GTTTACGGCGTGG ACTACCA; for Clostridium botulinum: F: CACATGCA AGTCGAGCGATG, R: AGGCTTTCCCCCACTTTGAG; for Clostridium cadaveris: F: AAATACCCGGGCTCAACCTG, R: CCTCAGTGTCAGTTACAGTCCA; for Peptostreptococcus anaerobius: F: TTTATGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT, R: GTGTA TAGGGCAGGTTACCCA; for Peptostreptococcus russellii: F: AA CCGCAAGGAAGAAGTCGT, R: CACCTTCCGATACGGCTA CC; and for Peptostreptococcus stomatis: F: GACTGAGGTGA CAGGTGGTG, R: CCCAACTGAATGCTGGCAAC. PCR products for different bacteria were cloned into vector to generate standard curves separately. Copies of each bacterium per gram of feces in each sample were calculated according to standard curves. Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism version 6.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validating Illumina RNA-seq Differential Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To verify the reliability of the Illumina RNA-seq results, 10 DEG-encoding proteins from different TF families were validated by RT-qPCR. A 1-μg RNA sample was reverse transcribed using a HiFiScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). Gene-specific RT-qPCR primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier, Canada) software (Supplementary Table S5). Tubulin served as an internal reference gene, and RT-qPCR was performed using Fast Super EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright Inc., Jiangsu, China) and an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR volume was 20 μL, which included 10 μL of 2× Fast Super Eva Green Master Mix, 0.5 μL of the forward primer, 0.5 μL of the reverse primer, 0.2 μL of 10× ROX, 2 μL of the cDNA template, and 6.8 μL of denucleated acid water. The reaction conditions were 2 min at 95 °C for denaturation followed by 45 cycles of 5 s at 95 °C, 5 s at 60 °C, and 50 s at 72 °C. The RT-qPCR analysis consisted of three biological and three technical replications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods of RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were described earlier. The qRT-PCR assays were performed using Fast Super EvaGreen® qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright, Suzhou, China) in an ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, United States) with the following program: 95°C for 2 min; 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 10 s, 72°C for 30 s, 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 60 s. The primers used for the amplification of MrERF, MrbZIP, and MrSURNod (Supplementary Table 2) were designed according to the CDS of MrERF (Cluster-20905.1), MrbZIP (Cluster-60183.76174), and MrSURNod (Cluster-60183.75597). All the primers were synthesized by Invitrogen (Beijing, China). A 20 μL reaction mix was set up containing 10 μL of 2 × Fast Super EvaGreen® Master Mix, 1 μL of 10 × ROX, 5.5 μL of ddH2O, 3 μL of cDNA, and 0.5 μg of each primer. The relative expression changes of the endogenous reference and tested genes were analyzed by the 2–ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extracted and the first‐strand cDNA synthesized were performed as previously described.[56] qRT‐PCR analysis was performed in 10 µL reactions using the Fast Super EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright Inc., Suzhou, China) with three technical replicates and three biological replicates. The gene‐specific primers were used to analyze the expression. The cotton GhUBQ14 and Arabidopsis AtTUB2 were used for endogenous control in qRT‐PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Validating Differentially Expressed AhWRKY Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven (11) AhWRKY genes obtained by Illumina RNA-seq that showed differentially expressed and contained cis-recognition elements involved in the abiotic/biotic stress were randomly selected for validation by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). All gene-specific primers were designed by Wcgene Biotech (Shanghai, China) (S1 Table). The housekeeping gene EF1b [52 (link)] was used as an internal control gene for qRT-PCR normalization. The qRT-PCR was run on the LightCycler® 96 instrument using Fast Super EvaGreen® qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright®Inc., China) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplification program was set as follows: 95°C for 2 min followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 1 min. Three (3) and two (2) biological and technical repetitions, respectively, were used for each gene sample. All data from qRT-PCR amplification were calculated with 2−△△CT method [53 (link)]. All expression data were analyzed using the Origin 8.0 software version v6.1052 (B232) (OriginLab Corp, Northhampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!