The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using trolox standard

1

Antioxidant Capacity Measurement Using ABTS Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAOS was determined with the ABTS assay according to Miller et al. [25 (link)], which is based on the ability of
antioxidants to prevent ABTS oxidation, and was adapted to the 96-well plate
format. Metmyoglobin is oxidized to ferryl myoglobin with hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2). There, ferryl myoglobin oxidizes ABTS to the
blue–green ABTS+ radical, which can be measured at 600 nm. In
the presence of antioxidants, radical formation is suppressed, allowing TAOS to
be calculated in comparison to a standard (Trolox).
First, 106 μl of Mix 1, containing 6 μM metmyoglobin (Serva, Heidelberg,
cat. no. 29895), 600 μM ABTS (Sigma, Steinheim, cat. no. A1888), and
0.05% anti-foam (Sigma, Steinheim, cat. no. A8582) in PBS buffer was
pipetted into a 96-well plate (Greiner, half-area), and 4 μl of plasma,
0.5 mM Trolox standard (Sigma, Steinheim, cat. no. 238813), or water was
added, and background absorbance was measured at 600 nm. 10 μl of a
freshly prepared H2O2 solution was added to a final
concentration of 242 μM and mixed immediately. After exactly 3 min,
absorbance was measured again. In order to obtain reliable data, it is very
important to measure all samples after the exact same incubation time and at the
same temperature (25°C). TAOS was calculated with the following
equations: TAOS=f((ΔAblankAsample)[mM] fconcentration
of the
standard
/(ΔAblankΔAstandard).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Activity of Cinnamaldehyde

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity of cinnamaldehyde and Trolox (Standard, Sigma Aldrich) was determined based on their radical scavenging effects of stable 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) free radical by a modified method [88 (link),89 (link)]. Solutions with different concentrations of cinnamaldehyde (1.9, 0.75, 0.4, 0.2, and 0.07 mM) were mixed with DPPH (80 µM) and protected from light for 30 min. Then, optical density was measured at 517 nm using a Cecil-Elect Spectrophotometer. Ethanol (1 mL) added of DPPH solution (80 µM, 1 mL) was used as blank. The optical density of the samples was recorded and % inhibition was calculated using the following formula: % Inhibition = [(AbsDPPH 80µM − Abs sample)/Abs DPPH 80µM] × 100. The tests were carried out in triplicate of three independent experiments. IC50 values were calculated by linear regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Olive Mill Pomace Phytochemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The olive mill pomace (OMP) samples were obtained from a continuous two-phase centrifugation system by a local olive oil mill in Portugal (Vilas Boas, Vila Flor, Bragança, 41359822, -7123743). Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid standard, Trolox standard, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), sodium carbonate anhydrous were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol and oleuropein were also obtained from Sigma Aldrich Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA). Solvents such as hexane, ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile and methanol were obtained from VWR International (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). Additionally, hydrochloric acid solution at 37% v/v and acetic acid standardized solution 0.1 N were also obtained from VWR International (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). All the reagents were either chromatographic or analytical grade and used as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ABTS Antioxidant Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antioxidant activity was determined by the ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) assay developed by Re et al. [61 (link)], with slight modifications. In brief, a solution of the radical cation ABTS·+ was prepared by mixing (1:1, v/v) a solution of ABTS diammonium salt (7 mM) and a solution of potassium persulfate (2.45 mM) in H2O. The mixture was kept in the dark at room temperature for 12–18 h before use. Then, the solution was diluted with EtOH to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. Stock solutions of Trolox standard (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), of RA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and of the corresponding extracts were prepared in EtOH. For the assay, 100 μL of the Trolox solution, RA solution, or extract solution were mixed with 2 mL of the ABTS+ solution, and the absorbance at 734 nm was measured after 6 min. Controls were prepared by adding 100 μL of EtOH to 2 mL of ABTS+ solution. All determinations were carried out in triplicate. The percentage of inhibition of the absorbance was calculated with the following equation: % Inhibition = [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100, where A0 expresses the absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance of the tested sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dietary Supplementation with Edible Bird's Nest

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnf-α) ELISA kits were purchased from Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China), while 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane (TMP), thiobarbituric acid, potassium persulphate (K2S2O8), 2,2’-azino-bis [3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid] (ABTS) reagent, trolox standard and trichloroacetic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Loius, MO, USA). RNA extraction kit was from RBC Bioscience Corp. (Taipei, Taiwan) and GenomeLab™ GeXP Start Kit was from Beckman Coulter Inc (Miami, FL, USA). Simvastatin, RCL2 solution and lipid profile kits were from Pfizer (New York, NY, USA), Alphelys (Toulouse, France) and Randox Laboratories Ltd (Crumlin, County Antrim, UK), respectively. Cholesterol and Cholic acid were purchased from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), respectively. Standard rat pellet was from Specialty feeds (Glen Forrest, WA, USA), while palm oil was supplied by Yee Lee Edible oils Sdn. Bhd. (Perak, Malaysia). All other solvents were of analytical grade and purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). EBN supplied by Blossom View Sdn. Bhd (Terrengganu, Malaysia) was cleaned under tap water for 5 mins, dried at room temperature and ground into powder manually using mortar and pestle before incorporating it into rat pellet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Simultaneous Quantification of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The compound 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (NTS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and flavonoid standards (myricetin, naringenin, chrysin, and galangin) were purchased from Fluka (Steinheim, Germany); acetonitrile and formic acid (both of them MS grade), methanol (HPLC grade), sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid, toluene, ethyl acetate, and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent from Merck (KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany); polyethyleneglycol 4000 (PEG), standards of phenolic compounds (rutin, hyperoside, astragalin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, and ferulic acid) and Trolox standard from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). All chemicals which purity is not previously emphasized were of analytical purity grade.
methanolic standard mixture of phenolic compounds was prepared with following final standard concentrations: galangin (50 ng/µL), chlorogenic acid, myricetin, chrysin and caffeic acid (100 ng/µL), gallic acid, ferulic acid and naringenin (200 ng/µL).
The cartridges for solid-phase extraction (SPE) were Strata C18–E (500 mg/3 mL) obtained from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). Ultrapure water was obtained from a TKA MicroPure (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) water purification system, 0.055 µS/cm. Syringe filters (13 mm, polyfluorotetraethylene (PTFE) membrane 0.45 µm) were purchased from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Aguamiel Carbohydrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FOS standards 1-kestose (GF2), 1-nystose (GF3), and 1F-fructofuranosylnystose (GF4) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Japan Company). Fructose (F), glucose (G), and sucrose (S) standards were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A Trolox standard was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Aguamiel was obtained from “Ejido Las Mangas” (long. −101.102500, Lat. 24.906111), Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico from Agave salmiana in December 2017. It was sterilized by membrane filtration (0.45 μm) before its use. Orafti HSI® was obtained from Beneo Company (Belgium). Agavins were obtained from Megafarma® (Durango, Mexico). Protein marker Prestained SDS-PAGE standard #1610318 was obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Silver BULLit™ silver stain kit was obtained from AMRESCO (Radnor, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Antioxidant Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antioxidant activity was determined using the DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, Saint Louis, MO, USA) radical scavenging activity method as previously described (34 (link)). The supernatant was collected after treatment of each sample extract (5 ml) with ethanol 98% (10 ml) and centrifuged at 8000 x g for 20 min. 100 μl of PB extract from each beverage was mixed with 2.9 ml of methanolic solution of DPPH (0.045 mg/ml). Absorbance was measured at 517 nm using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Jenway 6705 UV/Vis, Bibby Scientific Limited, ST15 OSA, UK) after the mixture was kept in the dark for 30 min. The relative antioxidant in a mixture sample to scavenge DPPH was compared with a Trolox standard (Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The results were expressed in equivalent μmol Trolox/L. The analyses were carried out in triplicate starting with a new batch of samples (three extracts). The result was calculated from nine repetitions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mangosteen Pericarp Antioxidant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) pericarp was purchased from a wholesaler and supplier of herbal raw materials (Delima Jelita Herbs Pvt. Ltd., Kedah, Malaysia). Mangosteen pericarp powder (MPP) in 120 mesh sieve size stored in the dark airtight bottles until use for analyses.
Trolox standard, TPTZ (2,4,6-Tris (2-pyridyl)-s-triazine), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2′-Azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (M) Sdn. Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia. Potassium persulphate was obtained from R & M Chemicals, United Kingdom. Ferric chloride hexahydrate was bought from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. α-mangostin standard was purchased from Tokyo Chemicals Industry, Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan. Gallic acid was obtained from Acros Organics, Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, New Jersey. Analytical-grade or HPLC-grade chemicals were chosen for this study and were used without further treatment unless otherwise mentioned.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Antioxidant Capacity in Citrus Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic content (TPC) was analyzed using a microvolume version of the Folin-Ciocalteu assay [21 (link)]. The calibration curve was obtained with standard gallic acid in water (Fluka, 100–800 mg/L, R2 = 0.999) and hesperidin in 0.1% NaOH solution (Fluka, 200–2000 mg/L, R2 = 0.998). The results were expressed both as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) and hesperidin equivalents (HE) on g of dry matter (dm) of extract.
Since natural extracts are composed of different phenolic compounds with different mechanisms of antioxidant activity, the antioxidant power of citrus extracts, before and after encapsulation, was measured using two antioxidant assays: the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and ABTS assays.
The FRAP of each extract was evaluated according to the procedure described by Bassani et al. [21 (link)]. A calibration curve was prepared with FeSO4·7H2O in water (Carlo Erba, 0.2–2 mmolFe(II)/L, R2 = 0.999). Then the results were calculated and expressed as μmolFe(II)/g dm of extract.
The ability of the extract to reduce the ABTS radical was analyzed according to the method of Bassani et al. [21 (link)]. The calibration curve was obtained with a Trolox® standard (Tr) in 50% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 100–500 mgTr/L, R2 = 0.999) and the results were calculated and expressed as μmolTr/g dm of extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!