The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

43 protocols using ertapenem

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Propidium iodide (PI) is a DNA stain that cannot cross the membrane of live cells, making it useful to differentiate healthy cells from dead cells. E. coli cells were immobilized to C5 chitosan on the microfluidic chamber in the presence or absence of antibiotics. Immediately before acquisition, the channel was rinsed with LB supplemented with 3 mg/liter ertapenem (Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 μl/ml PI (Sigma-Aldrich; P4170).
For MIC determination, different channels were prepared simultaneously with the same cell suspension. The antibiotics ertapenem, ampicillin (Sigma-Aldrich), amdinocillin (Sigma-Aldrich), and oxofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared at different concentrations (one channel contained only LB as a control) and added to each channel just before image acquisition (every 3 min for standard acquisition). The MIC was defined for the lowest antibiotic concentration that induced cell death/stasis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Conjugation of Ertapenem-Resistant Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conjugation experiments were carried out in Luria-Bertani broth (LB, Oxoid) with sodium azide-resistant Escherichia coli J53 and Acinetobacter baylyi (MIC of rifampicin 16 mg/L) as the recipients. Transconjugants were selected by plating onto LB agar plates (Oxoid) supplemented with 100 mg/L of sodium azide and 0.125 mg/L of ertapenem (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) using E. coli J53 as recipient, and 8 mg/L of rifampicin (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) and ertapenem, respectively, using A. baylyi as recipient.
Plasmid DNA was extracted by the Kieser method, electroporated into E. coli DH10B and plated on MacConkey agar (Becton Dickinson, Madrid, Spain) supplemented with ertapenem at 0.125 mg/L. 11 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Carbapenemase Detection Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the preparation of discs, nitrocefin discs (MAST Diagnostic group, UK) were impregnated with and without 10 µL of ertapenem (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 2 mg/mL to obtain ertapenem final amount of 20 µg/disc. Following discs had been air-dried in a cabinet, they were stored at -20ºC. The discs were allowed to equiplibrate to room temperature before use. To screen for the presence of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, two nitrocefin discs (one with and one without ertapenem) were directly placed on 18-h culture colonies grown on LB agar.
Following incubation at 37ºC for 30 min, the result was visually observed and interpreted. The development of a red color in the area of both discs with and without ertapenem was denoted as a positive result for carbapenemase, while no color changes in both discs or color change only in nitrocefin without ertapenem disc indicated no carbapenemase production.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Carbapenem Antibiotic Stock Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilised meropenem (Ranbaxy, Haryana, India), imipenem, ertapenem and meropenem (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) antibiotics were dissolved in sterile 0.85% saline to produce 5120 mg/L stock solutions, syringe-filtered at 0.1 µm and stored below −20 °C. FAST meropenem working stocks were made by serial 1:2 dilutions in filtered sterile Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) to produce 1 mL aliquots ranging from 2560 mg/L to 2.5 mg/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mtb H37Rv, Msm mc2-155 and Msm PM965 (ept-1 rpsL4 ΔblaS1), a mutant strain deficient for the major beta-lactamase BlaS (Raymond et al., 2005 (link)), were used in this study. Bacteria were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (BD Biosciences) or in Middlebrook 7H10 medium (BD Biosciences), supplemented with 0.2% or 0.5% of glycerol, respectively. Both media were supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (BD Difco) for Mtb and 0.5% glucose for Msm. Tyloxapol (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to liquid medium to a final concentration of 0.05% to prevent clump formation. Stocks of amoxicillin (AMX), biapenem (BIA), cefotaxime (CTX), doripenem (DOR), ertapenem (ETP), ethambutol (EMB), meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) (Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared in purified water. Potassium clavulanate (CLA) (Sigma-Aldrich) was prepared in phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 0.1 M. Isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) (Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide or methanol, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Conjugation Assay for CR-hvKP Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conjugation experiments were performed for CR-hvKP strains by a solid mating assay at 37°C, using the Escherichia coli J53 (azide-resistant) recipient (39 (link)). Transconjugants (Tc) were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with 1 mg/L ertapenem and 100 mg/L sodium azide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Putative transconjugants were screened for AMR determinants (including blaNDM), replicon types using PCR-based replicon typing (PBRT)-kit (Diatheva, Italy), and pLVPK-associated markers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Carbapenems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the broth microdilution test, involving meropenem (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), ertapenem (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), and imipenem (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) antibiotics, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [62 ]. Briefly, 100 µL of cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton (M-H) broth 2 (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to the 96-well polystyrene microtiter sterile plate. Serially diluted concentrations of meropenem, imipenem, or ertapenem ranging from 0.25 to 128 µg/mL were established. In each plate, wells without antibiotics were included as positive controls of growth, and wells without inocula and antibiotics were used as negative control. The bacterial suspension at 0.5 McFarland (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was diluted 1:20 to achieve 5 × 106 CFU/mL, and 5 µL was added to the plate wells as an inoculum. The plates were placed in a plastic bag and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were expressed in µg/mL using an inverted mirror to display the visual growth. The MICs were expressed in µg/mL using an inverted mirror to display the visual growth. The interpretation of the results was also in accordance to recommendations provided by the CLSI [63 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) for ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, and minocycline (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were determined by agar dilution, except for polymyxins and tigecycline, where the cation-adjusted broth microdilution method was performed [28 (link)]. The results were interpreted according to the Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (BrCAST/EUCAST) guidelines using the breakpoint Table version 10.0, published in may 20, 2020 (http://brcast.org.br/ (accessed on 1 January 2021)). E. coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Carbapenem Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) of recombinant BL21(DE3) cells harboring blaKPC-2 gene were determined by micro dilution method for different carbapenems alone and in combination with inhibitors (clavulanic acid, sulbactam, tazobactam, ZINC01807204 and ZINC02318494) against BL21 control cells (cells with null vector). The recombinant E. coli cells were induced with IPTG prior to performing experiments. The antimicrobial agents, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, clavulanic acid, sulbactam and tazobactam were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (USA) and compounds ZINC01807204 and ZINC02318494 were procured from Vitas M (Netherlands). The inhibitors were taken at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml. The results were interpreted according to the guidelines laid by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [12] . The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration that totally inhibits visible bacterial growth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, tigecycline, and minocycline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) were determined by agar dilution method according to the European Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Committee (EUCAST) recommendations (www.eucast.org/). The susceptibility profile to ceftazidime/avibactam and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim were tested by disk diffusion, while the MICs for fosfomycin and moxifloxacin were determined by E-test® gradient strips. The results were interpreted following the Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility (BrCAST/EUCAST) (http://brcast.org.br/), which is affiliated with the EUCAST. The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 strains were used as quality control for the antimicrobial susceptibility tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!