The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using tetracycline

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method (15 (link)). The following antimicrobial agents were used with their respective concentrations, obtained from Liofilchem Company, Italy: Amoxicillin (25 μg), Amoxicillin-clavulanate (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), nitrofurantoin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg). CLSI standard was used to compare the results (16 ).
Non-susceptibility to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial categories was defined as multi-drug resistance (MDR) isolates, while non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories was defined as pan-drug resistance (PDR) isolates (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method with some modifications [33 (link)]. Susceptibilities to ten different antibiotic discs (ampicillin (10 µg), penicillin G (10 IU), kanamycin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), and methicillin (5 µg) (Liofilchem, Teramo, Italy)) were evaluated. Each bacterial suspension was adjusted to a turbidity of McFarland 0.5 and inoculated to BHI plates. After antibiotic discs were carefully placed on BHI plates, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The diameter of a clear zone was measured and interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions based on CLSI guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility of B. coagulans IDCC 1201

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of B. coagulans IDCC 1201 was determined based on MIC values. In short, approximately 1–2 × 108 CFU/ml of B. coagulans IDCC 1201 was spread onto each MRS agar plate. Then antibiotic (E-test) strips containing ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (Liofilchem, Waltham, MA, USA) were placed on the agar plates.
Cell growth inhibition was also investigated to confirm the results of the antibiotic susceptibility test. B. coagulans IDCC 1201 at 106 CFU/ml and 1:1 (v/v) to each antibiotic solution at various concentrations were transferred to a 96-well plate and incubated at 37°C for 20 hr. Then, the optical density of each incubation was observed for 20 hr using a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The cutoff values of the MICs were determined according to EFSA's technical guidelines of the EFSA on antibiotic susceptibility (EFSA, 2018 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Disc Diffusion and E-Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because the disc diffusion method only allows the analysis of the impact of a single concentration of an antibiotic, in the second stage of the experiment, the E-test strips with exponentially decreasing antibiotic concentrations were applied for all of the antibiotics that were previously used in the disc diffusion test.
The cultures with the E-tests were exposed and incubated in the same way as described for the disc diffusion method. The E-tests containing cefoxitin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and teicoplanin were obtained from Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The analyses were performed on M–H agar in accordance with the E-test manufacturer’s recommendations.
The location of the Petri dishes in the RMF reactor chamber and the location of antibiotic discs and E-tests in Petri dishes are presented in Figure 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 18 antibiotics were used in the susceptibility test, by disk diffusion, with amoxicillin, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftiofur, cefepime, ceftaroline, aztreonam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tigecycline, tetracycline, fosfomycin, chloramphenicol, and nitrofurantoin (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The interpretation was performed according to CLSI [45 ]. tigecycline resistance was interpreted according to EUCAST [46 ]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control. In accordance with EUCAST standards, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin was determined by the broth microdilution method [46 ]. MDR profiles were determined according to standard criteria [26 (link)]. ESBL detection was performed using the double-disk synergy test (DDST) [45 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Campylobacter Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Campylobacter isolates were subcultured on Campylobacter agar with 5% sheep blood (Liofilchem, Italy) and incubated for 48 h at 42 °C in a micro-aerophilic atmosphere. The suspension for each bacterial isolate at 0.5 McFarland turbidity was inoculated onto Mueller–Hinton agar with 5% sheep blood. Erythromycin (0.016–256 mg/L), tetracycline (0.016–256 mg/L), and ciprofloxacin (0.002–32 mg/L) strips (Liofilchem, Italy) were placed on these agar media, and the plates were incubated at 42 °C in a microaerophilic atmosphere for 24 h (12 (link)). The results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (13 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of F. sanfranciscensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic resistance genes in 14 F. sanfranciscensis strains were analyzed using the CARD database (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, http://arpcard.Mcmaster.ca, accessed on 25 December 2023). If the sequence matching degree of the resistance gene reaches 20% (e-value < 1 × 10−5), the antibiotic resistance gene is considered to exist. The Origin 2023 software was used to build a thermal map of the predicted data.
Based on the American Association for Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [34 (link)], the antibiotic resistance of the 14 F. sanfranciscensis strains was tested using the disk diffusion method. The antibiotics per disk were as follows: gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, benzathine, ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and mitomycin-sulfamethoxazole, purchased from Liofilchem. The strains that were classified as susceptible (S, zone diameter > 20), intermediate (IR, 15 < zone diameter < 19), or resistant (R, zone diameter ≤ 14) hinged on the diameter of the zone of inhibition around the disk [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Screening of Probiotics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibilities of three probiotic candidates were assayed using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test strip method. Nine antibiotic strips were used for testing the bacterial strains, namely, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (Liofilchem, Abruzzi, Italy). The bacteria were grown for 18 h at 37 °C in MRS medium. The cells were harvested via centrifugation at 3470× g for 5 min, washed twice with PBS (pH 7.0), and resuspended in PBS to a McFarland turbidity of 0.5. The cell suspensions were inoculated on BHI agar using swabs. The plates were dried for 15 min, and the MIC test strips were placed on the agar surface according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C, and the results were assessed after 20 h of inoculation, according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Screening Carbapenem Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven carbapenem resistance genes (blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaSPM, blaAIM, blaDIM, blaGIM, blaSIM, blaKPC, blaBIC, and blaOXA–48) (Poirel et al., 2011 (link)) were screened using PCR detection from the presumptive carbapenemase-producing bacteria. The amplicons were sequenced (Macrogen) and identified using NCBI BLAST1. For the screened carbapenemase-producing bacteria, MDR to 16 antibiotics was determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and resistance to colistin was determined using broth dilution methods. For MDR, the following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg) ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (2 mg/L), doripenem (10 μg), fosfomycin (200 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Resistance to the antibiotics was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (Clinical Laboratory Standars and Institue, 2016 ). Subsequently, MICs of 16 antibiotics for E. coli strain N7 were evaluated using the broth dilution method (Hasselmann, 2003 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method was used with Muller Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd. Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) to determine antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates and CLSI M100 2020 was used to interpret the results [30 ].
The following antimicrobial discs were used: ampicillin (10μl), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10μl), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10μl), cefazolin (30μl), cefuroxime (30μl), ceftazidime (30μl) obtained from Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA. Ceftriaxone (30μl), cefotaxime (30μl), cefepime (30μl), imipenem (10μl), meropenem (10μl), amikacin (30μl), gentamicin (10μl), and tobramycin(10μl) were obtained from OXOID LTD., Basingstoke, Hampshire, England. Nalidixic acid(30μl), ciprofloxacin(5μl), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75μl), nitrofurantoin(300μl), and tetracycline(30μl) from Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!