The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jmp statistical software version 16

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

JMP statistical software, version 16, is a data analysis and visualization tool developed by SAS Institute. It provides a range of statistical methods and modeling techniques to explore, analyze, and interpret data. JMP 16 offers a user-friendly interface and advanced graphical capabilities to support data-driven decision-making.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using jmp statistical software version 16

1

SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Correlation with Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cycle threshold (Ct) values were determined by RT-qPCR in Biomedica de Referencia SA de CV. The SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test provides real-time quantification by first reverse transcribing SARS-CoV-2 RNA into cDNA (RT step) and then performing qPCR, during which a fluorescence signal increases proportionally to the amount of amplified nucleic acid, enabling accurate quantitation of the RNA in the sample (Tom and Mina, 2020 (link)). Many qPCR assays involve a Ct cut-off 34 to consider the test positive, allowing the detection of very few starting RNA molecules (Cruz-Rangel et al., 2022 (link)).
To estimate whether there was a correlation between Ct values and IP for both IgG and IgM, 31 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive serum samples were tested. All the data were analyzed with Pearson’s correlation analysis. The correlation analysis was performed using the JMP statistical software, version 16 (SAS Institute Inc, 2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Swallowing Assessment in Parkinson's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (minimum, maximum) for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for discrete variables. Univariate analyses were conducted using methods such as single regression analysis, contingency tables, analysis of variance, and logistic regression analysis to investigate the data related to the findings of VF for swallowing 3 and 10 mL of water, as well as temporal analyses. In this process, we included the mean values of rigidity scores, tremor scores, PIGD scores, and limb scores, and as mentioned, UPDRS Part 3, in the analyses. Subsequently, we explored the associations between various VF findings and the corresponding UPDRS subscores. Initially, we conducted univariate analyses and extracted factors with p-values < 0.10. These factors were then subjected to a multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP statistical software version 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Appropriate statistical tests, such as the χ2 test, Mann–Whitney U test, or unpaired t-test, were employed to assess intergroup variances. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Prognostic Factors for Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or percentage. Differences in categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test with the Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test. The risk factors for poor prognosis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Continuous and qualitative variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson’s chi-squared test, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the risk factors for poor OS. OS and DSS rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP statistical software version 16.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Disease Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median, and percentage. The OS and DSS rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. When calculating the DSS rate, cases in which the cause of death was unknown were excluded. Cox regression analysis for DSS was performed to calculate the hazard ratios. Differences were considered statistically significant at p-value < 0.05. JMP statistical software version 16.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!