The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Scd 050 sputter coater

Manufactured by Oerlikon Balzers
Sourced in Germany, Liechtenstein

The SCD 050 Sputter Coater is a piece of laboratory equipment designed for thin-film deposition. It utilizes the sputter coating technique to apply a thin, uniform layer of conductive material onto a substrate. The core function of the SCD 050 is to facilitate the deposition of thin films for various applications, such as sample preparation for electron microscopy or the creation of specialized coatings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using scd 050 sputter coater

1

Orthodontic Resin Luting Cement Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One circular sample (6 mm in diameter × 2 mm in height) of each orthodontic resin luting cement was made using a rubber mold and light cured as described previously. The specimens were gold/palladium coated (Balzers-SCD 050 sputter coater, Germany) and digital images at 500× were obtained under a scanning electron microscope (JEOL-5600 LV, Japan), under a voltage acceleration of 15 KV, Z = 25 mm, WD = 20 mm, and a spot size of 27 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polystyrene Template Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dimensions and the topography
of the polystyrene template were analyzed via multipinhole confocal
microscopy utilizing a μsurf explorer (NanoFocus AG, Germany)
equipped with a 10× objective (Olympus, Germany). 3D height maps
were generated using μSoft analysis software (NanoFocus AG).
In addition, the templates were characterized by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM). The template was adhered to specimen stubs via carbon
adhesive and sputter-coated with gold for 40 s (BALZERS SCD 050 Sputter
Coater, Germany). Imaging was performed using a XL30 ESEM-FEG microscope
(Philips, Netherlands) in high-vacuum mode using accelerating voltages
of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Surface Analysis of Treated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After profilometry readings, we randomly selected three specimens of each group for SEM analysis. Specimens were cleaned by ultrasound (Ultrasonic Cleaner T-1449-D, Odontobrás, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) for 10 min to remove any residues and then immersed into a glutaraldehyde solution (2.5%) in sodium cacodylate (0.1 M) buffer with a pH of 7.4 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany). Samples were dehydrated in an increasing series of 20, 50, 75, 95, and 100% ethanol (Labsynth Ltda., Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 20, 20, 20, 30, and 60 min, respectively. Specimens were metalized with a fine gold overlay (Bal- Tec, SCD 050 Sputter Coater, Balzers, Liechtenstein), submitted to SEM (Zeiss, EVO 50, Cambridge, England) and photographed at a magnification of 3000x so that the surfaces could be analyzed22.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial adhesion on titanium surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Escherichia coli (strain W 3310) were grown overnight in Luria- Bertani (LB) medium. The overnight culture was adjusted to an optical density of 0.001 (OD600) and incubated with the samples at 37 °C under gentle shaking (80 rpm). After 24 h the samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS and MilliQ, and dried with nitrogen gas. After sputtering with a 10 nm gold layer (BALZERS SCD 050 Sputter Coater) the unstructured and hierarchically structured part of the titanium surface were imaged with SEM (FEI ESEM XL30 FEG). The experiments were performed three times with three samples respectively. Four images per structured and unstructured part of each sample were evaluated with ImageJ (v 1.52a Wayne Rasband, NIH USA) by measuring the area covered with bacteria. The results were normalized to the median of the coverage on the unstructured sample parts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM, five specimens were fixed either in glutaraldehyde (2.5% in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer) for two hours and post-fixed overnight in OsO4 (2% in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline [=PBS, Supplementary Protocol 2], pH 7.4) or in 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) overnight. Samples were cut into smaller pieces using a razor blade, dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series, critical point dried in a CPD 030 (Bal-Tec AG, Balzers, Liechtenstein), glued onto standard aluminum stubs (diameter =12,5 mm; Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), sputter coated in a SCD 050 Sputter Coater (Balzers Union) and imaged using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4000; Hitachi High-Technologies Europe GmbH, Krefeld, Germany) as described previously118 (link),119 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing Microcarrier Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried microcarriers were attached to the sample holder via carbon adhesive, and sputtered with gold for 60 s at 40 mA (SCD 050 Sputter Coater, Balzers). These samples were then imaged using a XL30 ESEM-FEG scanning electron microscope (Philips) using the secondary electron detector and acceleration voltages of 3.0–5.0 kV. A Dragonfly spinning disc confocal laser microscope (SPCLM) (Andor Technology Ltd, Belfast, Ireland) mounted on a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope was used to visualize the Atto 647 labelled microcarriers in the hydrated state (phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS)), with a 637 nm laser diode and images were taken with a 10x magnification objective (CFI Plan Apo Lambda, Nikon). Microcarrier diameter and pore size were determined using ImageJ software (NIH) as described previously [1 (link),2 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Starch Granule Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were placed on carbon adhesive tape attached to the stub and sputter coated with 20 nm of gold (SCD 050 Sputter Coater, Balzers). The morphology of starch granules was observed in an S-4800 SEM at 5 kV or 15 kV acceleration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optical and Morphological Analysis of Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical and morphological properties of fibers are analyzed by polarizing optical microscopy (POM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). POM is done in transmission mode using an Olympus BX51 equipped with a Linkam (T95 series LTS120E, Surrey, UK) heating/cooling stage, an Olympus DP73 camera (Tokyo, Japan) and a Canon EOS760D camera (Tokyo, Japan). SEM imaging of the fibers are done using JEOL JSM-6010LA (Akishima, Japan) being operated in 12–15 kV range using an In-lens secondary electron detector. For SEM imaging fiber samples are gold coated (≈25 nm thickness) using a sputter coater (Balzers SCD 050 Sputter Coater) for 100 s. SEM image analysis is done using ImageJ® software to calculate the fiber diameter [42 (link)]. The average fiber diameter is calculated by analyzing 50 fibers from different sample locations. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) is done using a Thermo ScientificTM NicoletTM iS5 spectrometer with id5 ATR accessory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Biocompatibility of Cell Transformations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the biocompatibility of the uptake and washing methods, colony forming units (CFUs) were counted after 48 hours of incubation at 30 °C on YPD plates (in triplicates) after a dilution series to prevent overcrowding. The respective controls for chemical and electrical transformation were produced with the exact same amount of pipetting and washing steps as for the transformation experiments. In order to check for cellular damage as a result of the used treatment, cells were imaged using SEM (FEI Magellan 400 XHR Scanning Electron Microscope, USA). In preparation, cells fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylic acid were dried on a cover slip and coated with a 4 nm gold layer for 30 seconds at 20 °C, 40 mA in a Balzers SCD050 sputter coater.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Springtails

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, the samples (springtails, replicates and exuviae) were dried and sputter-coated with 10 nm gold (BALZERS SCD 050 Sputter Coater). The animals and their exuviae could be dried under normal conditions, whereas the replicates had to be dried in an exsiccator under vacuum pumping for 16 h due to the strong uptake of water in the PEGda. Bacteria were counted in at least nine areas per sample type by the detailed analysis of all connected bacteria referred to as colonies. From these data the colony density and the size distribution of colonies were evaluated in order to illustrate more than the amount of cells with the intrinsic strong deviations due to partially inhomogeneous cell coverage, i.e. large areas without and large areas with many cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!