The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Analyst work station software

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States

The Analyst WorkStation Software is a data acquisition and processing platform designed for use with AB Sciex mass spectrometry instruments. The software provides a user interface for instrument control, data collection, and data analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using analyst work station software

1

Metabolomic Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRM data were acquired with the SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3), then the raw (.wiff) MS data files were converted to.txt format using the MSconverter. MS peak detection and annotation were performed in the R program (Kuhl et al., 2012 (link)). Differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) obtained were screened with pairwise comparison using the Variable Importance in the Projection (VIP) with the first principal component of the OPLS-DA model as >1 and p < 0.05, Student's t-test, as the threshold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-MS/MS Quantitative Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HLD was separated on an EXIONLC System (Sciex Technologies, United States) ultra-performance liquid chromatography using a Waters Acquity HSS T3 column (1.8 μm 2.1 × 100 mm) at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Mobile phases A and B were aqueous solutions containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile, respectively. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 0–0.5 min, 2% B; 0.5–10 min, 2–50% B; 10–11 min, 50–95% B; 11–13 min, 95% B; 13–13.1 min, 95–2% B; 13.1–15 min, 2% B. The column temperature was 40°C. The autosampler temperature was 4°C, and the injection volume was 2 μl.
Sciex Q Trap 6500+ (Sciex Technologies) was used for the assay development. Typical ion source parameters were: ion spray voltage: +5500 V, curtain gas: 35 psi, temperature: 400°C, ion source gas 1:60 psi, ion source gas 2: 60 psi, DP: ± 100 V. The SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3) was employed for multiple reaction monitoring data acquisition and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolome analysis of 12 samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Widely targeted metabolome analysis was used to analyze the metabolites of 12 samples. QC samples were used to control the quality of the experiment. The LC-MS/MS analyses were performed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (EXION LC System, SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) coupled with an SCIEX 6500 QTrap and Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer. All mass spectrometry data acquisition and quantitative analyses of target compounds were performed with SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (version 1.6.3). DAMs were identified by using a threshold value of p ≤ 0.05 and variable importance in project (VIP) ≥ 1. The functions of DAMs were further annotated using the KEGG compound database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomics Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3) was used for data collection and processing. MSconverter was used to convert MS raw data (.wiff) to TXT format. Peak detection and annotation were performed using an in-house R program and database (Zhang et al., 2015 (link)). SIMCA (V16.0.2) was used to perform principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) (Wiklund et al., 2008 (link)).
The value of variable importance in the projection (VIP) of the first principal component in OPLS-DA analysis was obtained to visualize group separation and identify significantly changed metabolites. It summarizes the contribution of each variable to the model. Metabolites with VIP > 1 and fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 and P-value < 0.05 (Student’s t-test) were considered DAMs. Commercial databases, including KEGG and MetaboAnalyst,1 were used for KEGG enrichment analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeted Metabolite Extraction and LCMS Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were extracted by 500 μL extraction solution (methanol/acetonitrile/water, 2:2:1, precooling at −40°C). The upon mixture was vortexed for 30s and sonicated for 5 min at 0°C, followed by homogenization for 4 min at 40 Hz. The homogenate and sonicate circle was repeated three times. After the above procedure, the sample was incubated at −40°C for an hour and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The UHPLC separation was carried out using an ExionLC-Sciex (Sciex), equipped with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters). The mobile phase A was 5 mM ammonium acetate& 0.1% acetic acid in water, and the mobile phase B was acetonitrile. A SCIEX 6500 QTRAP + triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex), equipped with an IonDrive Turbo V electrospray ionization (ESI) interface, was applied for assay development. Typical ion source parameters were: Curtain Gas = 40 psi, IonSpray Voltage = ±4500 V, temperature = 475°C, Ion Source Gas 1 = 30 psi, Ion Source Gas 2 = 30 psi. The MRM parameters for each of the targeted analytes were optimized using flow injection analysis and were performed by injecting the standard solutions of the individual analytes into the API source of the mass spectrometer. SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3) and Sciex MultiQuant™ 3.0.3 were employed for MRM data acquisition and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Identification Using Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCIEX Analyst Workstation Software (Version 1.6.3) was employed for the acquisition and processing of the MRM data. MS raw data (.wiff) files were converted to TXT format using MSconventer. To identify the substances, mass spectrometry data were analysed based on internal databases and public databases (MassBank, HMDB, and METLIN). Some metabolites were identified according to the mass spectral information and retention times of the standards. After the mass spectrometry data were obtained for different samples, all mass spectrum peaks were subjected to area integration, and the mass spectrum peaks of the same substance in different samples were subjected to integration correction. Structurally similar standards for each metabolite were selected for relative quantification, as detailed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCIEX Analyst Workstation Software (Version 1.6.3) was employed for MRM data acquisition and processing. MS raw data (.wiff) files were converted to the .txt format using msConvert. The R program and database were applied for peak detection and annotation (Smith et al., 2006 (link); Kuhl et al., 2012 (link); Zhang et al., 2015 (link)). In the ion chromatogram, the target compounds showed symmetrical chromatographic peaks, and the chromatographic separation of the target compounds was well achieved. After data processing, orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and principal component analysis were performed on metabolite data before and after inoculation, and the results were visualized by scatter plots (Mi et al., 2019 (link); Yang et al., 2020 (link)). Differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) between the pre-E. cristatum and post-E. cristatum groups were determined according to t-test value of p <0.05 and VIP >1. Lastly, the KEGG pathway database was used to enrich the metabolic pathways of DAMs, and R was used to visualize the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Noni Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The identification and quantification of polyphenols from noni fruit and the supernatant from in vitro digestion followed the protocol established by Zhao et al. (2021) (link). UHPLC separation was performed using UPLC-ESI-Q-TRAP-MS (SHIMADZU Nexera X2, Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP) equipped with a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (1.7 μm, 2.1*150 mm). Peak identification was performed in both positive and negative modes. The wavelength was set at 320 nm. The mobile phase A consisted of 0.1 % formic acid in water, and the mobile phase B contained acetonitrile. The column temperature was set to 40 °C, and the auto-sampler temperature was set at 4 °C with an injection volume of 2 μL. The gradient profile was as follows:10 % B (0–0.5 min), 60 % B (0.5–15 min), 98 % B (15–18 min), 10 % B (18–20 min) with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Each sample was injected with a volume of 20 µL. Data acquisition and processing were performed using SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3) and Sciex MultiQuant™3.0.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3, Framingham, MA, USA) was employed for MRM data acquisition and processing. MS (Mass spectrometry) raw data files (.wiff format) were converted to the TXT format using MSconventer. Then, in-house R program and self-compiled database (Shanghai Biotree Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were applied to peak detection and annotation [42 (link),43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MRM Data Acquisition and Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and processing for Multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) was carried out using SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3). MS-converter was used to change MS raw data (.wiff) files to the TXT format. An in-house R program and database were applied for peak detection and annotation. The data were standardized using the internal standard normalization method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!