The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Df7518

Manufactured by Affinity Biosciences

The DF7518 is a laboratory centrifuge capable of separating biological samples based on their density. It can accommodate a variety of sample volumes and speeds up to 18,000 rpm. The centrifuge is designed for general-purpose laboratory use.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using df7518

1

Imaging Synovial Inflammation in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tail veins of AIA rats were administered with free DiD or DiD-NPs. Ankle joints were collected 24 h after the last administration to prepare sections. The prepared sections of 10 μm thick slices were stained with CD44 antibody (Affinity Biosciences, DF6392, 1:500), CD68 antibody (Affinity Biosciences, DF7518, 1:500), and FOLR2 antibody (Affinity Biosciences, DF9518, 1:300). Nuclei was stained by DAPI. A laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 800, Zeiss, Germany) was taken to record the fluorescent distributions in synovial joints.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescent Hydrogel Biocompatibility Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescently labeled dye with an excitation wavelength of 550 nm (EFL-DYE-UF-ENE-R) was dissolved in LAP at 5 mg/ml to prepare fluorescent hydrogels. All samples were divided into SilMA, MSN/SilMA, Ag@MSN/SilMA and Ag@MSN-BMP-2/SilMA groups. The hydrogels were made into cylinders with a diameter of 1 cm and a height of 5 mm using a mold. Mice were anesthetized, then the backs of the mice were shaved and sterilized. The samples were implanted into the backs of the mice (n = 40, 10 mice per group). Photographs were taken immediately after the operation (day 0) and at weeks 1, 4 and 8 using a subcutaneously small-animal live imaging system (Bruker) to observe and record hydrogel degradation in different groups.
All samples in SilMA, MSN/SilMA, Ag@MSN/SilMA and Ag@MSN-BMP-2/SilMA groups were crosslinked to assess the biocompatibility of the composite hydrogels by UV light in vivo, and subcutaneously implanted into the back of rats (n = 40, 10 rats per group). The rats were anesthetized at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation, and each implanted hydrogel scaffold was removed and weighed to plot the degradation curve. Skin tissue fixed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining and CD68 (DF7518, Affinity) immunofluorescence were subsequently performed to assess the in vivo biocompatibility of the hydrogels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

IHC Staining Protocol for NLRP3 and Inflammation Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed according to the commercial kits (PV-6001 and PV-6002, ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China). Antigen retrieval of the paraffin sections was performed using the same protocol described for IF staining. Subsequently, sections were incubated with 0.3% H2O2 for 10 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidase activity and then washed with PBS. After being blocked with 5% goat serum for 15 min, slices were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies as follows: rabbit anti-NLRP3 antibody (ab214185, 1:200, Abcam), rabbit anti-cleaved-caspase 1 p20 (1:100, AF4005, Affinity), IL-1β (1:100, GTX74034, Gentex), rabbit anti-GSDMD (1:800, ab219800, Abcam), mouse anti-IBA-1 (1:300, GB12105, Servicebio), rabbit anti-Ly6G (1:500, GB11229, Servicebio), rabbit anti-CD68 (1:100, DF7518, Affinity). The sections were incubated with enzyme-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or goat anti-rabbit IgG polymer for 30 min. Finally, immunoreactivity was visualized using 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, ZLI-9017, ZSGB-Bio) followed by restaining with hematoxylin. Images were captured by a light microscope (Leica, DM2500, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!