The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 22.0 windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 22.0 for Windows is a statistical software package designed for data analysis and management. It provides a range of tools for data manipulation, statistical modeling, and visualization. The software is intended to assist users in organizing, analyzing, and interpreting data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spss version 22.0 windows

1

Comparative Analysis of Intervention Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All baseline and post-intervention data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were initially confirmed to be normally distributed by using Bartlett’s and Levene’s tests. Homogeneity of variance was tested before further statistical analyses. Thus, no transformation was required.
Independent samples t-test and paired t-test were used to examine difference between the two groups at baseline and the differences within groups following the intervention, respectively. Between-group differences following the intervention were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance [time (pre vs. post) — group (TRT vs. FRT)]. When the significant interactions were found, the independent samples t-test was applied to determine inter-group differences. A value of p of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
For main parameters, mean difference in change (pre – post-interventions) for the two groups are reported, and the respective effect sizes calculated as partial eta square converted to Cohens d, being classified as “small” from 0 to 0.2 “medium” from 0.2 to 0.8, and “large” if higher than 0.8 (Cohen, 1992 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Factors Influencing Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were applied in SPSS version 22.0 Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). A two-tailed P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages and were compared by use of the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and were compared normally distributed variables with Student’s t-test and nonnormally distributed variables with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for all the variables that were statistically different in the univariate analysis to identify the independent risk factors of diagnosis BAV in the study population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fingolimod Effects on Mitochondrial DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis, SPSS version 22.0 (Windows) was used. The concentration of mtDNA copies was not normally distributed and therefore a natural logarithm was taken. For correlation analyses, subjects were divided into different groups according to their lesion volumes and normal brain volumes based on a median split. We had to make subgroups for the volume-related comparisons due to non-linearity of the data.
Based on EDSS scores, patients were divided into three categorical groups (EDSS: 0–3.5, 4.0–5.5, 6–10). The three groups largely reflect, respectively, patients with no/limited, moderate, and severe walking impairment.
Differences between the distinct groups were analyzed using linear regression. All results were corrected for disease duration as a confounder. In all statistical analyses, age and disease duration were both relevant confounders, but due to collinearity, only disease duration was included as a covariate (as this was the strongest confounder).
To compare baseline and follow-up mtDNA copies in the fingolimod-RRMS group, a Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant for main effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data were processed and analyzed using the SPSS version 22.0 (Windows, SPSS Inc.). p < .05 was considered indicative of statistically significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Upper Extremity Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data collected in this study were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 Windows version. The Shapiro‐Wilk test was performed to test the normality of the general data of the subjects. Nonparametric analysis was performed because the normality assumption was not satisfied. The chi‐square test, descriptive statistics, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyze the general characteristics and the upper extremity function and daily living performance of the two groups before the intervention. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test compared the before and after between the experimental group and the control group. The Mann–Whitney U test was conducted to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in scores on upper extremity function and daily living performance after intergroup intervention. The statistical significance was set to α = .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Numerical and Categorical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shapiro-Wilk test was used to understand whether numerical variables were distributed normally. The data that were normally distributed between the groups were analysed through student's t-test while non-normally distributed data were compared via Mann-Whitney U test. Chi-square test was used to analyse the relations between categorical variables. For statistical analyses SPSS 22.0 Windows version was used and a p-value under 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!