The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using acetic anhydride

1

Pollen analysis materials and methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HiCrome Bacillus agar was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Seelze, Germany), and a physiological solution (0.9% NaCl) was obtained from Panreac AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany). The glacial acetic acid from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), acetic anhydride from Panreac (EU), sulphuric acid from JMGS (José Manuel Gomes dos Santos, Lisbon, Portugal), ethanol from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK), and glycerin from VWR chemicals (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) were used for the pollen analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pollen Analysis of Honey Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The honey samples’ pollen was analysed using the methodology described by Erdtman, (1969) [29 ]. Ten grams of the sample was dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water. The obtained mixture was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5804R, Hamburg, Germany) and the supernatant was discarded. After that, 5 mL of glacial acetic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. Then, acetolysis of the pollen sediments was carried out, using a mixture of 9:1 of acetic anhydride (Panreac Applichem, Barcelona, Spain) and sulphuric acid (José Manuel Gomes dos Santos, Lisbon, Portugal), in a water bath at 100 °C for 2 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. After carefully washing the sediment with 5 mL of water containing 3 drops of ethanol (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and centrifuging it, 5 mL of glycerin–water (50%) was added, and the sediment was mounted in gelatin-glycerinate (VWR chemicals, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). The frequency of the appearance of the different pollen types was divided into the following classes: dominant pollen (>45% of the pollen spectrum); accompanying pollen (15–45%); important pollen (3–15%); minor pollen (1–3%); and other pollen (≤1%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phytochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetic anhydride, bismuth nitrate, and sodium nitrite were obtained from Panreac® (Barcelona, Spain). Diphenylboric acid-β-ethylamino ester, fast blue B salt, gallic acid, iodine, oleanolic acid, polyethylene glycol-4000, protocatechuic acid, and vanillin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich® (Steinheim, Germany). Ethanol was obtained from Aga® (Prior Velho, Portugal). Glacial acetic acid and sulfuric acid were obtained from Chem-Lab® (Zedelgem, Belgium). Acetone, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, hydrochloric acid 37% extra pure, iron trichloride, perchloric acid, potassium iodate GR, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, and TLC cellulose plates (catalog number 105552) were obtained from Merck® (Darmstadt, Germany). Butanol-1 and methanol were obtained from Fisher Chemicals® (Leicestershire, UK). Ferrous sulfate was obtained from May and Baker LTD® (Dagenham, UK). The (+)-Catechin (hydrate) was obtained from Cayman Chemical Company® (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Aluminum chloride was obtained from Fluka® (Buchs, Switzerland). Acetonitrile was obtained from Honeywell Riedel-de Haën™ (Seelze, Germany). Formic acid 99–100% was obtained from VWR Chemicals (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). All used reagents were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fractionation and Characterization of Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol Hipersolv®, absolute ethanol, and pure acetone (Merck®, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for the delipidified infusion fractionation. For the monitorization and characterization of fractions, methanol Lichrosolv and Methanol Hipersolv® (VWR, PA, USA), glacial acetic acid, ethyl acetate, formic acid (98–100%), acetone and toluene (Merck®), deionized water Milli-Q (Millipore Symplicity®, Molsheim, France), diphenylboryloxyethylamine and polyethylene glycol 4000 (Sigma® Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), p-dimethylaminocynamaldehyde and sulfuric acid (Merck®) were used.
For in vitro evaluation of micellar solubility, sodium taurocholate (European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard®, Strasbourg, France), phosphatidylcholine (Sigma® Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), cholesterol (Sigma® Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium chloride (Merck®), sodium phosphate (Merck®), and chloroform (HiPersolv Chromanorm®, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) were used. The Liebermann–Buchard reagent was prepared by mixing 0.5 mL of sulfuric acid (J. T. Baker®, Deventer, The Netherlands) in 10 mL of acetic anhydride (Panreac®, Barcelona, Spain), as described by [24 ]. Authentic standards of the flavonoids luteolin (Extrasynthese®, Genay, France), luteolin-6-C-glucoside (isoorientin) (Extrasynthese®), and luteolin-7-O-glucoside (Extrasynthese®) were also used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!