The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using swinnex filter holder

1

Phage Extraction from Antarctic and Mediterranean Seawater

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five liters (L) of Antarctic seawater samples were filtered by 5 μm Swinnex® filter holders (Millipore, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), followed by filtration through 3 μm mixed cellulose ester membranes (MCE) (Merck), and filtration through 0.2 μm Isopore™ polycarbonate membranes. Phage particles from the final filtrate were recovered by chemical flocculation [25 (link)]. An iron chloride solution (10 g/L) was used to flocculate the viral particles in the sample, which were then recovered by filtration through 1.2 µm Isopore™ membranes. Viral particles retained in the filters were resuspended using a 0.1M EDTA-0.2M MgCl2-0.2M ascorbic acid buffer to a final volume of 5 mL.
For Mediterranean seawater samples, 100 mL was filtered through 0.22 μm low protein binding polyethersulfone (PES) membranes. Viral particles in filtered samples were then concentrated with PEG8000 following previously reported protocols [18 (link),26 ].
Lastly, the suspensions of phages of both origins were dialyzed and concentrated with Amicon® Ultra Centrifugal Filters to volumes of 0.5 mL. The concentrated phage suspensions of both origins were used for the phage DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gold Particle Delivery of Plasmid DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid DNA (2–5 µg) was precipitated onto gold particles (< 10 μm, Sigma Aldrich) by mixing with 50 µl of gold (1 mg/10µl), 20 µl of 0.1 M spermidine and 50 µl of 2.5 M CaCl2. After 20 min at room temperature, 90 µl of supernatant was removed and discarded. From the remaining solution, 5 µl aliquots were placed onto six Swinnex filter holders (13 mm, Millipore, USA) for bombardment of the prepared somatic embryogenic tissue with a Particle Inflow Gun [90 ] using the following settings: helium pressure, 900 kpa; solenoid valve opening time, 30 ms; shooting distance, 19 cm (lowest shelf position); chamber vacuum, -96 kPa (-14 psi). Tissue was then placed in a dark culture room at 24 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microcell-Mediated Chromosome Transfer Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MMCT was performed essentially as previously described (Meguro-Horike and Horike 2015 (link)). For each experiment, six T-25 flasks of A9-14 or A9-15 cells at 80%–90% confluency were treated with 0.075 µg/mL demecolcine (Sigma) for 48 h. On the day of MMCT, the flasks were filled to the neck with prewarmed serum-free F-12 media supplemented with 10 µg/mL cytochalasin B (Sigma). Flasks were submerged in water and centrifuged in 500-mL bottles (Nalgene) at 10,000g for 1 h at 34°C. The microcell pellet was resuspended in serum-free F-12 media and filtered through nitrocellulose membrane filters (8 µm and 5 µm, respectively; Whatman) in 25-mm Swinnex filter holders (Millipore). Microcells were centrifuged at 1500g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of serum-free F-12 media containing 200 µg/mL phytohemagglutinin P (Sigma) and applied to a 70% confluent 60-mm dish of hTERT-RPE1 Hyg−ve cells. Following 30-min agglutination at 37°C, media was removed and membrane fusion was facilitated by addition of 1 mL of PEG 1500 for 2 min. Cells were then extensively washed with serum-free F-12 media. Following 24-h incubation in complete media, MMCT fused cells were selected using 400 µg/mL hygromycin and 20 µg/mL blasticidin. Clones were visible 2–3 wk later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genome Sequencing of Cultured Marine Microbes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventy cultures were selected for whole-genome sequencing based on their growth yields and response to HMW DOM substrate addition. To obtain sufficient amounts of DNA for the NexterXT library preparation, 10-μl of culture was inoculated into acid-cleaned polycarbonate bottles containing 200 ml TFF seawater amended with HMW DOM to 3x DOC. After incubating at 22°C in the dark for 4–5 weeks, the cells were collected on 0.1 μm pore-size, 25 mm diameter Durapore membranes (Millipore) using Swinnex filter-holders (Millipore) and peristaltic pumping. Filters were stored frozen (−80°C) in 600 μl of tissue lysis buffer (Qiagen). DNA was extracted from thawed filters using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA samples were prepared for sequencing and barcoded using the Nextera XT DNA 96-sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and sequenced with one 250 × 250 nt paired-end MiSeq run (Illumina). Sequences are deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive under study SRP045600.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling Inoculum and Stationary Phase Microbial Communities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine community composition for the inoculum communities, 30 mL of the inoculum communities were pushed through Swinnex Filter holders (13 mm, Millipore) containing 13 mm 0.22 µm filters (autoclaved, Durapore membrane PVDF, Millipore) connected to Luer-Lok syringes (BD). Filter paper was removed from the holder, cut into 4–6 smaller pieces, submerged in 125 µL QE buffer with 1% Ready-Lyse Lysozyme (Epicenter, Quick Extract Kit) in eppendorf tubes, and shook at 400 rpm overnight at room temperature. The tubes were spun down at 1700 rpm for 5 min the second day and the supernatant was stored at −20 °C till future use.
The composition for communities growing in SSM were determined at early stationary phase. For each community, 200 µL of sample was taken and filtered through MultiScreen HTS GV filter plates (0.22 µm, sterile, PVDF membrane, Millipore) by spinning the plates for 5 min at 3000 rpm. Each well was incubated overnight in 100 µL QE buffer with 1% Ready-Lyse Lysozyme (Epicenter) on a tabletop shaker at 400 rpm. DNA extract was collected by spinning the plates for 5 min at 3000 rpm and obtaining the flow through.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Filtration and Fixation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fluid samples were filtered using 13 mm diameter SPI–pore polycarbonate track etch filters (SPI supplies, West Chester Pennsylvania, USA), held in 13 mm Swinnex® filter holders (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) attached to syringes with Luer-Lok® couplings to prevent sample leaks. In a Class II Biosafety Cabinet, bacterial suspensions were made form growth on agar plates. Approximately two loop-fulls of bacteria were suspended in 1 ml PBS. If the suspension was too turbid a 10X dilution was made. The filter was first wetted by passing 2 ml of PBS through the apparatus. Then 0.2 ml of the bacterial suspension was applied to the filter with a 1 ml syringe, followed by three consecutive 2 ml washes of PBS using a 2 ml syringe. Finally 2 ml of 4% glutaraldehyde was applied with a 2 ml syringe. After one hour wait, the filter was washed with 2 ml 50% ethanol, 2 ml 70% ethanol, 2 ml 85% ethanol, 2 ml 95% ethanol, and then 2 ml of 100% ethanol and finally air dried. Syringes were either operated by hand, or with a Legato 200 syringe pump (KD Scientific, Holliston, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Filtration of Cell Suspensions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isopore track-etched PC membranes with 5 and 8 μm pore size and 13 mm polypropylene Swinnex filter holders were purchased from the Merck Millipore (MA, USA) and Sterlitech (WA, USA), respectively. Before the dead-end MFP, either PC or SiN membranes were mounted between two pieces of a 13 mm Swinnex filter holder, in which the top piece was connected directly to a syringe. To test the stability of the delivery setup and prime the microporous filters, 70% ethanol and sterilized DI water followed by PBS was flushed through a 3 ml syringe mounted on the syringe pump at the flow rate of 1 ml min−1. Next, the cell suspension was pumped through the microporous filter membranes by a syringe pump (KDS Legato, Sigma Aldrich Inc, MO, USA), and treated cells were collected in an Eppendorf tube for further assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing Antimicrobial Peptide Impact on Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to verify and to visualize the impact of AMPs on the bacterial membrane, electron microscopy was conducted. Therefore, bacterial suspensions of E. coli and S. aureus with a concentration of 2 × 105–8 × 105 CFU/mL were incubated with 128 μg/mL of one AMP (LF11-322-C8) and PMB in a microplate over night at 37 °C. After overnight culture, the bacteria were prepared for SEM. To achieve this, the bacteria suspensions were filtered through a sterile filter (Swinnex filter holders, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The filters with the collected bacteria were than washed with PBS (10 mM, pH 7.2) and fixed with a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Deutschland). The fixed specimens were gradually dehydrated by increasing ethanol solutions (10% to 100%) and sputtered with gold (Q150R ES Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Sussex, UK) prior to examination with a scanning electron microscope (FlexSEM 1000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of bacterial cultures as well as abiotic controls (not inoculated with Lysinibacillus sp. TchIII 20n38 cells) were filtered through a 0.2 μm GTTP isopore polycarbonate filters using a Swinnex filter holder (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Filters were then air-dried, mounted on aluminum supports with carbon tape, and coated with carbon (7–8 nm thickness), gold (7 nm thickness), or platinum (5 nm thickness). SEM observations were performed using two different instruments; a Hitachi SU 3500 SEM installed at the electron microscopy platform of the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), and a Zeiss Ultra 55 field emission gun SEM equipped with a Brucker EDS QUANTAX detector (Brucker Corporation, Houston, TX, United States) installed at IMPMC (Sorbonne Université, Paris, France). For observations using the Hitachi SU 3500 instrument observations were made in secondary electron mode with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. SEM-FEG images were acquired in secondary electron mode using with the Zeiss Ultra 55 instrument with an in column detector (InLens) at 2 to 5 kV and a working distance of 3 mm. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were performed at 15 kV and a working distance of 7.5 mm after calibration with reference copper.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SEM Observation of Filtered Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM observations, about 100 µL of suspension of each sample were filtered through a 0.2 µm GTTP polycarbonate filter in a Swinnex filter holder (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Dried filters were carbon coated and analyzed using the Zeiss Ultra 55 SEM operating at IMPMC (Paris, France) and equipped with a field emission gun and a Brucker EDS QUANTAX detector (Brucker Corporation, Houston, TX, USA). Imaging was performed in secondary electron mode (In Lens detector) at 5 kV and a working distance of 3 mm. Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDXS) analyses and mapping were performed at 15 kV and a working distance of 7.5 mm after calibration with reference copper.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!