The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

559 protocols using lsrii cytometer

1

Bone Marrow and Spleen Cell Isolation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions from bone marrow or spleen were prepared by passing the tissues through 70 μm cell strainers (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and red blood cells were lysed in RBC lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA). One million cells from each sample were then labeled with the following, anti-CD41-FITC (BD Pharmingen) or anti-TER119-APC-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen) for 30 minutes on ice. Labeled cells were washed in autoMACS Rinsing Solution (Miltenyi Biotec, Aubum, CA) with the addition of 0.5% BSA, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight and then analyzed on a LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). For analysis of Lineage-Sca1+c-Kit+ (LSK) cell and myeloid progenitor cells, ten million bone marrow cells were lineage depleted by using the Lineage Cell Depletion Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's protocol with the addition of the anti-IL-7R-biotin antibody (BD Pharmingen). After magnetic separation of the lineage cells through the MACS MS column, the lineage negative cells were incubated with streptavidin-PE-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), anti-Sca1-PE-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen), anti-c-Kit-APC (BD Pharmingen), anti-FcγR-PE (BD Pharmingen) and anti-CD34-FITC (BD Pharmingen) on ice for 30 minutes and analyzed on a LSRII cytometer after washing and fixation as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody Staining of Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody staining of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) or single-cell suspensions from spleen was performed as previously described (16 (link)). Briefly, cells were pre-incubated with Fc-block (anti-CD16/32) 10 min at 4C to prevent unspecific binding, followed by incubations with surface mAbs for 20 min at 4C. Cells were then washed with staining buffer (PBS supplemented with 2% FBS). For transcription factors, the Foxp3/transcription factor staining buffer set was used following manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher). Stained cells were analyzed with an LSRII cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Fluorescence minus one (FMO) or biological comparison controls were used for cell analysis. See Supplementary Table 1 for a detailed description of antibodies used. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Expression of T Cell Co-Stimulatory Molecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh live PBMCs were isolated over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and stained with anti-CD4 allophycocyanin cyanine (APC-Cy7), anti-ICOS allophycocyanin (APC), anti-CD28 peridinin chlorophyll protein cyanine (PerCP-Cy5.5), anti-CD45RO fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), and anti-PD1 phycoerythrin (PE) conjugated antibodies (Biolegend, eBiosciences) to determine the expression of co-stimulatory molecules on the CD4 T cell surface. Cells were analyzed on a LSR-II cytometer (Becton-Dickinson). Prior to each run, laser voltages were adjusted with Ultra Rainbow Calibration Particles (Spherotech) to ensure run-to-run consistency of the cytometer over the duration of this study. Data was analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Penile Lymphocyte Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were resuspended in PBS-2% FBS, transferred to a 96 round-bottom well plate (106 cells/well) and labeled with indicated combinations of antibodies (Table S1 in Supplementary Material) or matched isotype control antibodies (Table S2 in Supplementary Material) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed twice in PBS-2% FBS and fixed with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) for 15 min at room temperature.
Data were acquired, with an LSRII cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Cochin CYBIO platform) and analyzed with Kaluza Software (Beckman-Coulter). As shown on Figure 1, penile lymphocytes were identified based on their forward and side scatter, after a cell-doublet exclusion step. Next, lymphocytes were identified as CD45+ cells, and immune cell populations were defined according to their phenotypic characteristics, namely, CD3CD19+ for B cells, CD3+CD4+ for CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ for CD8+ T cells, and CD3CD56+ or CD3+CD56+ for NK and NKT cells, respectively. Finally, phenotypes, activation status, as wells as functions, were evaluated for each population as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunophenotyping and Proliferation of Mouse BMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 2-week culture in α-MEM plus 10% FBS, mouse BMSCs were trypsinized, pelleted and then resuspended in PBS containing 2% FBS to a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml. Freshly isolated bone marrow cells were resuspended to a concentration no more than 1 × 107 cells/ml. Cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, 45-0451-80), anti-mouse/rat CD29 PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, 25-0291-80), anti-mouse CD105 (Endoglin) PE (eBioscience, 12-1051-81), and anti-mouse Ly-6A/E (Sca-1) APC (eBioscience, 17-5981-81), and analyzed with an LSRII cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). For BrdU Incorporation, the mice were intraperitoneally labeled twice (a 16-h interval) with 1 mg/mouse/injection BrdU and euthanized 2 h after the second injection. Freshly harvested bone marrow was treated with 1× RBC Lysis Buffer (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The remaining cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-mouse/rat CD29 PE-Cy7, anti-mouse CD105 (Endoglin) PE, and anti-mouse Ly-6A/E (Sca-1) Alexa Fluor 700 (eBioscience, 56-5981-82) before permeabilization, DNase treatment and staining with anti-BrdU APC according to the instruction of APC BrdU Flow Kits (BD Pharmagen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The percentage of BrdU-positive fractions was assessed using FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Murine Blood and Spleen Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior sacrifice, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (1%), and blood was collected via retro-orbital puncture. One-hundred microliter of blood were subjected to automated blood parameter analysis using a VetScan hematology device (Abaxis, USA). Also, 100 µl of blood were incubated with TruStain FX (BioLegend, USA) to block Fc-receptors, and stained with ten different monoclonal antibodies (clone) directed against surface molecules of major leukocyte subpopulations: Ly6C FITC (HK1.4), NK-1.1 PE (PK136), CD11b PE-Dazzle (M1/70), CD8a PerCPCy5.5 (536.7), CD3 PECy7 (17A2), CD43 APC (S11), CD4 AlexaFluor700 (RM45), B220 APCCy7 (RA36B2), CD115 BV421 (AFS98), Ly6G BV510 (1A8); all BioLegend. Red blood cells were lysed using an ammonium chloride-based buffer (BioLegend), and pellets washed with FACS buffer. Samples were acquired on a three-laser, ten-color Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, USA). Data analysis was performed using Kaluza 1.5 software (Beckman-Coulter). For cytokine analyses, blood plasma was obtained by centrifugation, and stored at −80 °C until analysis using cytometric bead array (Becton-Dickinson, USA) which was acquired on a LSRII cytometer (Becton-Dickinson). Also, splenocytes were recovered from sacrificed mice and incubated in vitro overnight. Supernatants were taken off and analyzed using cytometric bead array.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cell Viability and Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell viability was determined by crystal violet staining (0.2% w/v in 2% ethanol) and Trypan blue or propidium iodide exclusion (GIBCO-Invitrogen, CA). For cell cycle analysis, MEFs were fixed in ice in 70% ethanol, washed with 1% BSA-PBS, incubated with 1 mg/mL RNase A for 10 min at 37°C, and then resuspended in PBS containing 0.1 mg/mL propidium iodide. Acquisition and analysis of DNA content was by flow cytometry using an LSR II cytometer (Becton Dickinson, NJ) and FlowJo software (Tree Star, OR). Apoptotic cell populations were determined by TUNEL assay (Roche, IN) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations with minor changes: cells were first trypsinized to make a single cell population, which was then fixed, permeabilized and labeled with dUTP-conjugated to FITC. The percentage of TUNEL positive apoptotic cells was determined by flow cytometry enumeration of fluorescent cells (FITC-A: 570–620 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained for 10 minutes at room temperature with a HLA-A*1101/SSC pentamer (5μg/ml; ProImmune, Oxford, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then washed and stained on ice for 30 minutes with Pro5 Fluorotag (APC or R-PE-labelled; ProImmune) and saturating concentrations of anti-CD3 (PE-conjugated), anti-CD4 (FITC-conjugated) (Pharmingen) and anti-CD8 (tricolor- or ECD-conjugated) (Caltag) antibodies. For intracellular cytokine staining T cells were stimulated for two hours with T2-A11 cells pre-pulsed with or without SSC peptide (5μg/ml). Brefeldin A (10μg/ml, Sigma) was then added and cells cultured for another 5 hours. Cells were then stained with pentamer and antibodies to surface markers (CD4-FITC, CD8-ECD, BD Pharmingen) as described above. After treatment with fixation and permeabilisation buffers (E-bioscience, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, cells were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with anti-cytokine antibodies (IL2-PE, IFNγ-PECy7 and TNFα-APC) or an isotype- and concentration-matched control antibody (BD Pharmingen), then washed twice in PBS. Cells were analysed using an LSRII cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Cycle Analysis by BrdU Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The APC BrdU Flow Kit (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used for flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After the respective treatment (either cytokines, drugs, or controls), BrdU solution was added for another 3 h into the medium of the cells (10 µL of 1 mM BrdU per mL culture medium). Then, both the adherent as well as the detached cells in the supernatant were collected and counted. A total of 5 × 105 cells/well were placed into a 96-deep-well plate, fixed, permeablized, and stained according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Flow cytometric measurements were performed on an LSRII cytometer in combination with the FACSDiva software V. 9.0, and the derived data were analyzed using the FlowJo software V. 10.8.0 (all from Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotypic Characterization of Murine and Human Hematopoietic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was done using an LSRII cytometer or FACS Caliber (Becton Dickenson, San Diego, CA) and chromophore-conjugated antibodies used for mouse BM cell phenotyping (Mantel et al., 2010 (link); 2012 (link)). See also Figure S1C. Antibodies used for human phenotyping (Notta et al., 2011 (link)) were anti-lineage cocktail, CD34, CD38, CD45RA, CD90, and CD49f (BD Biosciences). For mitochondrial mass, membrane potential, and ROS analysis (Mantel et al., 2010 (link); 2012 (link)), we used Mitotracker Green FM, JC-1, and Mitotracker Orange CMTMRos respectively (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies; Grand Island, NY). CXCR4 antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Phenotyping for mouse transplant chimerism/engraftment analysis was as noted (Mantel et al., 2012 (link); Broxmeyer et al., 2012 ). Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis was assessed by activated caspase-3 (Mantel, et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!