The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using lc 20ab hplc system

1

HPLC Analysis of MPT in Rabbit Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MPTs are UV-active chemicals because they contain benzene rings and conjugated groups in their structures. Maximum absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 200 nm. The reference standard of MPT was run with a concentration of 10 µg/mL to detect the wavelength. A Shimadzu LC 20AB HPLC system (Tokyo, Japan) with a 1000 pump and UV-VIS detector was used in this analysis. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and sodium acetate buffer with a pH of 3.2. The stationary phase consisted of an Agela C18 column that was 250 millimeters by 4.6 millimeters and had a particle size of 5 micrometers. The injection volume for HPLC analysis was kept at 20 µL, along with the 1.0 mL/min flow rate, and the UV detector was set to a wavelength of 200 nm. The acquired chromatograms were compared with the reference standard of MPT, and the drug loading efficiency was calculated in triplicate. The proposed technique was effectively used to investigate drugs in plasma samples [37 (link)]. We carried out this assay in rabbit plasma under identical conditions, and the outcomes demonstrated its validity as a technique. According to USP and ICH guidelines, the analytical process was carried out, and numerous parameters, including precision, accuracy, specificity, and linearity, as well as the limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD), were determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomics of EA.hy926 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins were extracted from EA.hy926 cells using the Lysis buffer (7 mol/L Urea, 2 mol/L Thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 40 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.5) containing protease inhibitors PMSF (1 mmol/L) and EDTA (2 mmol/L). The protein concentrations were determined using BCA kits (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). After trypsin digestion and peptide measurement, iTRAQ labeling was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol for 8-plex iTRAQ reagent (Applied Biosystems). The labeled samples were mixed and divided into 20 fractions, via strong cation exchange chromatography, using an LC-20AB HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). After desalting in a Strata X C18 column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), each fraction’s supernatant was loaded on an LC-20AD nanoHPLC system (Shimadzu). Mass spectrometry (MS) using a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, Canada) was performed after HPLC.
The Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.3.02) was applied to analyze the MS data for protein identification. The proteins that possessed at least two unique spectra were considered for further analysis. p < 0.05 and fold change >1.2 denoted significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Quantification of MSN-FP Drug Loading

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each 100 mg of MSN-FP was measured with an analytical balance. MSN-FP was separately combined with 100 mL of methanol while being gently stirred for an hour. A validated HPLC method was used to quantify the filtrate after the combination had been filtered. The Shimadzu LC 20AB HPLC system had a UV-VIS detector and a 1000-pressure pump (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan). Ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 7.6), methanol, and acetonitrile were employed as the mobile phase in a ratio of 10:50:40 (%v/v) on an Agela C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µ) as the stationary phase. The UV detector was set at a wavelength of 254 nm, the injection volume was 20 µL, and the mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Drug loading efficiencies were computed in triplicate and compared with the resulting chromatograms to standards. The nasal spray stability and FP leakage from MSN within the nasal spray were both determined using the same process.
Entrapment efficiency (%)=Drug addedFree drugDrug added×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were equally mixed, and the mixture
was diluted in mobile
phase A (5% ACN, pH 9.8) and injected onto a Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC
system. A Gemini high pH C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm)
was used for liquid-phase separation of samples. Gradient elution
was applied with conditions described as follows: flow rate of 1 mL/min:
5% mobile phase B (95% ACN, pH 9.8) for 10 min, 5–35% mobile
phase B for 40 min, 35–95% mobile phase B for 1 min, flow phase
B lasted 3 min, and 5% mobile phase B equilibrated for 10 min. The
elution peaks were monitored at a wavelength of 214 nm, and the fractions
were collected every minute. Finally, the peptide components were
combined into a total of 10 fractions, which were then freeze-dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solubility Determination of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A variation of a previously reported method was employed to determine the compounds’ solubility in buffer at pH 7.4.61Briefly, 10 mM DMSO stock solutions of compounds were diluted to 400 μM in buffer (200 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). The mixture was stirred for 1 hr, filtered, and then injected onto a Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC system (Solvent system: gradient from 15% MeCN/85% H2O to 95% MeCN/5% H2O (+0.1% formic acid) over 13 minutes; Column: Shimadzu C18, 50 μm, 50 × 4.6 mm; (UV, 254 nm). A 10 mM stock solution was prepared by completely dissolving test compound in DMSO. This solution was diluted to six known concentration solutions (1200 μM, 400 μM, 120 μM, 40 μM, 12 μM, and 4 μM) in MeCN. Each solution was analyzed by HPLC, and a calibration curve was plotted using the peak areas from the standard concentrations. The equilibrium solubility of test compounds was determined by quantifying the concentration of test solutions against the calibration curve. (SI Figure S10). Experiments were run in triplicate and results were tabulated and reported as mean ± standard deviation (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Lipid Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total lipid was extracted from 2 × 107 cells, using a modified method of Bligh and Dyer. An internal standard cocktail (Avanti Lipids Polar) was added at an amount of 10 μl to each sample according to 1 mg of extracted tissue protein during lipid extraction. Lipid extracts were subjected to triple-quadrupole MS (QTRAP 4000 and 6500; SCIEX, Framingham, MA). Both negative and positive electrospray ionization modes were used, and precursor ion scans and neutral loss scans were run in each mode. Lipid identification was based on MS data and assisted by the bioinformatics tool Lipid MS Predict (http://www.lipidmaps.org/). Quantitation was done by one internal standard per lipid class. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Lipid compositions were separated on the Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC system (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Leaf Proteome Profiling Under Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf proteins were extracted using a phenol-based method (Wu et al. 2014 (link)). After reduction and alkylation, 100 μg proteins were digested overnight at 37 °C with 0.5 µg sequencing-grade trypsin (Niu et al. 2019b (link)). The resultant peptides were desalted, vacuum-dried, redissolved in mobile phase A (5% acetonitrile, pH 9.8), and separated on a Gemini high-pH C18 column using a Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC system. Next, the peptides were reconstituted in mobile phase A (2% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) and separated using a Thermo UltiMate 3000 UHPLC. After enrichment and desalting, the samples were placed on a tandem self-packed C18 column and separated using mobile phase B (98% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid). The separated peptides were ionized using a nanoESI source and passed through an Oritrap Exploris 480 tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode detection. The DDA data were identified using the Andromeda search engine against UniProtKB (January 27, 2022). DAPs were identified based on |log2FC| ≥ 1 (q ≤ 0.05) for significant difference by MSstats in R (Choi et al. 2014 (link)). Finally, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of DAPs were used to identify stress-related metabolic pathways. The proteome data were deposited in the ProteomeX Change Consortium (accession no. PXD037099).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High pH Reverse Phase Peptide Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptide mixture was resolved in buffer A (20 mM ammonium formate in pure water, pH 10.0) and fractionated by high pH reverse phase separation using LC-20AB HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan), with a 4.6 mm × 150 mm, Gemini-NX 5u C18 110A column (Phenomenex, Guangzhou, China) and a linear gradient starting from 5% buffer B to 80% buffer B in 30 min (buffer B: 20 mM ammonium formate in 100% acetonitrile, pH 10.0). The peptide fractions were then collected and dried in a vacuum concentrator (Christ RVC 2-25, Christ, Germany) for downstream analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Peptide Fractionation and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After labeling and quenching, the samples of roots and leaves were combined and lyophilized, respectively. The peptide mixture was dissolved in 4 mL strong cation exchange (SCX) buffer A (25% v/v acetonitrile, 25 mMNaH2PO4, pH 2.7). The peptides were fractionated on a Shimadzu LC-20ABHPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using an Ultremex SCX column (4.6 × 250 mm). Peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with elution buffer B (25% v/v acetonitrile, 25 mM NaH2PO4, 1 M KCl, pH 2.7). The absorbance at 214 nm was monitored and 20 fractions were collected. Samples of each fraction were dried and desalted before LC-ESI MS/MS analysis [33 (link),34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation of pooled samples was performed on a LC-20AB HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan). Eluted peptides were collected into 20 fractions. Supernatant peptides were loaded onto a LC-20AD nanoHPLC (Shimadzu, Japan) using an autosampler and a 2cm C18 trap column. Then, peptides were eluted onto a 15cm analytical C18 column, which was packed in-house. The injection volume was 10μl, and the flow rate was 300nl/min. Peptide acquisition was performed with a Triple TOF 5600 System (AB Sciex, USA) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB Sciex) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, USA). MS/MS scans were performed in high sensitivity mode, as described previously [50 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!