The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quorum q150r s sputter coater

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Quorum Q150R S sputter coater is a laboratory equipment designed for thin film deposition. It uses a sputtering process to coat samples with a thin layer of material, such as metals or other conductive materials. The core function of the Q150R S is to provide a controlled environment for the sputtering process, allowing for the deposition of uniform and consistent thin films onto a variety of substrates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using quorum q150r s sputter coater

1

Nano Spray-Dried Powder Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Samples of selected nano spray-dried powder materials were coated with gold using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, UK) at 20 mA for 90 s. The samples were then visualized using a ZEISS EVO LS 10 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were captured using the ZEISS SmartSEM version 5.05 software and analyzed using the JMicroVision version 1.3.4 software (Roduit, N., Geneva, Switzerland). For each of the selected nano spray-dried powder materials, the maximum Feret’s diameters of 300–900 particles, which were randomly selected from 2–3 images, were determined. Grubbs’s test was used at a significance level of 0.001 to determine outliers. After removing outliers, the number-weighted ( DN ) and the volume-weighted ( DV ) particle size distributions were constructed. The mean diameter ( Dmean ), the 10th percentile ( D10 ) of the cumulative undersize particle diameter distribution, the median diameter ( D50 ), the 90th percentile ( D90 ) of the cumulative undersize particle diameter distribution, and the Span  ( Span=D90D10/D50 ) were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were directly sprayed onto aluminium foil. A small square (~1 × 1 cm) was cut from the foil and mounted onto an aluminium stub (TAAB Laboratories, Aldermaston, UK) with carbon-coated double-side adhesive tape, prior to sputter coating with gold for 60 s (10 nm gold layer) using a Quorum Q150RS sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK). The coated samples were then analysed using a Phenom Benchtop SEM (ThermoFisher, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with applied voltage of 10 kV. The size of the particles was determined using the Image J software version 1.53c (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each formulation the size of 100 particles from three different frames each was determined. The size distributions were plotted using Prism version 8.4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Particle Morphology Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle shape was studied by scanning electron microscopy using a ZEISS EVO LS 10 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). For this purpose, the particles were coated with gold using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, United Kingdom) at 20 mA for 90 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Surface Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM observations were carried out using Phenom Pro X and Phenom XL Desktop SEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were observed with gold coating and at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The samples were coated with gold using Quorum Q150R S Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Cochlea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were euthanized and excised inner ears were fixed overnight in 2.5 % gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Fixed ears were decalcified for 48 hours in 4.3 % EDTA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Fine dissection was performed to reveal the organ of Corti, before osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific)–thiocarbohydrazide (Fluka) processing (adapted from Hunter-Duvar [18 (link)]) was carried out. The inner ears were then dehydrated through increasing strength ethanol solutions (Fisher Scientific) and critical point dried using an Emitech K850 (EM Technologies Ltd). The specimens were then mounted on stubs using silver paint (Agar Scientific) and sputter coated with platinum using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies). Prepared cochlea were visualised with a JEOL LSM-6010 (Jeol Ltd) scanning electron microscope. Hair cell stereocilia bundle counts were performed by counting the number of adjacent inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) to ten pillar cells. For the analysis the cochlea was divided into three separate regions (turns), apical (<180° from apex), mid (180–450° from apex), and basal (450–630° from apex). Four ears (one ear per mouse) were analysed for each genotype at each region.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cryo-Fractured Membrane Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cross-section morphology of the cryo-fractured membranes was studied using scanning electron microscopy. The samples were coated with gold using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, UK) at 20 mA for 90s. The samples were then visualized using a ZEISS EVO LS 10 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were captured using the ZEISS SmartSEM version 5.05 software (Roduit, N., Geneva, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Inner Ear

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were culled by cervical dislocation and inner ears were removed and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 4 hours at 4°C. Following decalcification in 4.3% EDTA, cochleae were dissected to expose the organ of Corti, and subjected to ‘OTO’ processing (1 hour incubation in 1% osmium tetroxide (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.), 30 minute incubation in 1% thiocarbohydrazide (Sigma), 1 hour incubation in 1% osmium tetroxide), before dehydration in increasing concentrations of ethanol (25%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 95%, 2 x 100%) at 4°C. Samples were critical point dried with liquid CO2 using an Emitech K850 (EM Technologies Ltd), then mounted on stubs using silver paint (Agar Scientific) and sputter coated with platinum using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies). Samples were examined using a JEOL JSM-6010LV Scanning Electron Microscope. Hair cell bundle counts were performed by counting the number of OHC and IHC bundles adjacent to ten pillar cells in the apical (<180° from apex), mid (180 – 450° from apex) and basal (> 450° from apex) regions of the cochlea. At least three ears (one ear per mouse) were analysed for each genotype at each time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analysis of Healthcare Surface Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition and morphology of the PMMA, “rough” steel and ceramic healthcare surfaces were analysed in the sterile state and after wiping with biocide or water (dH2O) impregnated wipe samples. Wiping was performed as described by Edwards et al. [19 (link),26 (link)], with 10 replicates per sample. The healthcare surfaces were gold coated using a Quorum Q150RS sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd.; Lewes, East Sussex, UK). A JEOL JSM-6610 LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan) was then used to image the samples, with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV, a working distance of 8 mm and a typical magnification of 750×. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was carried out using an Oxford Instruments INCA Xmax80 EDS Spectrometer (Oxford Instruments PLC; Abingdon, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Carbon Fiber Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of carbon fibres post-coating with Au through sputtering was examined using the SEM 1 (Model JSM-6360A, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Additionally, the cross-sectional morphology of the cryo-fractured PBT/rPET/CF composites was investigated using another SEM 2. Gold coating was applied to the samples using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, UK) at 20 mA for 90 s. Visualization was conducted with a ZEISS EVO LS 10 SEM (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) at an accelerating voltage of 20.0 kV. Image capture was facilitated by the ZEISS SmartSEM version 5.05 software (Roduit, N., Geneva, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Inner Ear

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were culled by cervical dislocation and inner ears were removed and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 4 hours at 4°C. Following decalcification in 4.3% EDTA, cochleae were dissected to expose the organ of Corti, and subjected to ‘OTO’ processing (1 hour incubation in 1% osmium tetroxide (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.), 30 minute incubation in 1% thiocarbohydrazide (Sigma), 1 hour incubation in 1% osmium tetroxide), before dehydration in increasing concentrations of ethanol (25%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 95%, 2 x 100%) at 4°C. Samples were critical point dried with liquid CO2 using an Emitech K850 (EM Technologies Ltd), then mounted on stubs using silver paint (Agar Scientific) and sputter coated with platinum using a Quorum Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies). Samples were examined using a JEOL JSM-6010LV Scanning Electron Microscope. Hair cell bundle counts were performed by counting the number of OHC and IHC bundles adjacent to ten pillar cells in the apical (<180° from apex), mid (180 – 450° from apex) and basal (> 450° from apex) regions of the cochlea. At least three ears (one ear per mouse) were analysed for each genotype at each time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!