The injected animals were sacrificed 21 days after MSCs injection and the ovaries were collected in formalin or normal saline. In the first 5 injected animals, routine hematoxylin and eosin staining of 4–5 µm sections was done to evaluate the morphologic changes of the ovary after MSCs injection. The number of atretic primordial, primary, and preantral follicles was then determined. Immature follicles were scored as atretic if the oocytes were degenerating (convoluted, condensed) or fragmented. Grossly atretic immature follicles lacking oocyte remnants were not included in the analyses. In the 5 animals injected with labeled MSCs, testing for the homing of MSCs in the ovaries was done by staining of the ovarian sections with Prussian blue for iron oxide labeling of the newly formed oocytes.
Iron oxide
Iron oxide is a chemical compound composed of iron and oxygen. It is a common material used in various laboratory applications. Iron oxide serves as a core functional component in laboratory equipment and experiments, providing essential properties and capabilities.
Lab products found in correlation
5 protocols using iron oxide
Restoring Ovarian Function with Labeled MSCs
The injected animals were sacrificed 21 days after MSCs injection and the ovaries were collected in formalin or normal saline. In the first 5 injected animals, routine hematoxylin and eosin staining of 4–5 µm sections was done to evaluate the morphologic changes of the ovary after MSCs injection. The number of atretic primordial, primary, and preantral follicles was then determined. Immature follicles were scored as atretic if the oocytes were degenerating (convoluted, condensed) or fragmented. Grossly atretic immature follicles lacking oocyte remnants were not included in the analyses. In the 5 animals injected with labeled MSCs, testing for the homing of MSCs in the ovaries was done by staining of the ovarian sections with Prussian blue for iron oxide labeling of the newly formed oocytes.
Fly Ash Catalyzed Esterification Reactions
(methanol, isopropyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, octanol) and carboxylic
acid feedstock (adipic acid, stearic acid, and ptathalic anhydride)
were purchased from commercial vendors. GC analytical standards were
purchased from Sigma. Individual oxides, viz., silica (SiO2 100–200 mesh size), alumina (C504-type), and iron oxide were
purchased from Sigma-Merck. Reactants were used without purification.
Various fly ash samples were collected from different industries;
those collected from the steel manufacturing industry were named as
FS-1, with FP-1 for those from the thermal power industry and FC-1
for those from the alkali chemical industry. All fly ash catalysts
were used without modification. During the reuse experiments, the
fly ash was calcined at 500 °C for 1 h. For the control esterification
reaction, the mixture of oxides was prepared through physical mixing,
and the percentage of individual oxides in the mixture was kept as
per the composition of the FS-1 fly ash catalyst.
Synthesis of Conductive Polymer Composites
Tetrahydrozoline Hydrochloride Electroanalytical Assay
hydrochloride authentic sample (THZ, C13H17ClN2, 236.74 g mol–1, purity 100.80 ± 0.92)
was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (CAS Number 522-48-5). The fresh THZ
solution was prepared on a daily basis by dissolving the authentic
THZ sample in deionized water. The disposable screen-printed carbon
working electrodes were constructed as described in detail elsewhere61 (link) using the commercial printing carbon ink (Electrodag
421 SS, Acheson, UK). Different metallic oxide nanopowders were tested
as electrode modifiers including copper oxide (<50 nm particle,
544868 Sigma-Aldrich), iron oxide (Sigma-Aldrich), and zinc oxide
(Sigma-Aldrich) in addition to Zeolite Y (NISTRM8850, Sigma-Aldrich).
The standard drug-free biological samples were purchased from VACSERA
(Giza, Egypt). Universal buffer (4.0 × 10–2 mol L–1) was prepared by mixing a calculated amount
of boric acid, phosphoric acid, and acetic acid in bidistilled water,
and the required pH value was adjusted with NaOH.
Effect of Nanoparticles on Salt-Stressed Plants
We treated plant samples with NaCl (Merck-Germany), iron oxide, and zinc oxide nanoparticles (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom), according to Table 1. We prepare salinity by adding sodium chloride solutions to pots containing 6-leafed plants. We applied the nanoparticles weekly after salinity induction by leaf spraying.
Although nanoparticles were purchased from a reputable company, they were tested with X-ray diffraction (XRD) for greater reliability. We determined the crystal phase of these nanoparticles by XRD using CuKα as a radiation source (40 kV, step size 0.05). The reference code for iron oxide nanoparticles was 00-005-0637, and those for ZnO nanoparticles were 01-079-2205. The Williamson-Hall method was used to estimate nanoparticles size (Prabhu et al., 2014) (link).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!