The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Detection system

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, China

The Detection system is a versatile laboratory instrument designed to facilitate the analysis and identification of various biomolecules. It is capable of detecting and quantifying a wide range of analytes, including proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules. The system employs advanced detection technologies to provide accurate and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

46 protocols using detection system

1

Western Blot for Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated from harvested cells by RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The protein extract concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to the polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% nonfat milk at room temperature for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The next day, the membrane was incubated with the suitable secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The protein signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence with ECL detection reagents on a Bio-Rad Detection System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Antioxidant Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from immortalized hepatocyte cells using a TRIzol kit (Life Technologies) by following the manufacturer's recommendations. The concentration of RNA samples was measured by a Nanodrop ND‐1000 (Therrmo Fisher Scientific). For real‐time analysis, cDNA was transcribed from a total of 100 ng of DNase I‐treated RNA using a SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Therrmo Fisher Scientific) and Oligo DT (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Real‐time quantitative PCR amplification reactions were carried out in a Detection system from Bio‐Rad (CA) in a 20 μl volume. To determine relative mRNA expression, the housekeeping gene (GAPDH) and antioxidant marker gene with SYBR green (Dyne Bio) were used. Gene expression was analyzed by performing PCR amplification of cDNA with the specific primers: NRF2 (forward), 5′‐ACA CGG TCC ACA GCT CAT C‐3′ and (reverse), 5′‐TGT CAAA TCA AAT CCA TGT CCT G‐3′; GCL (forward), 5′‐TTG CCT CCT GCT GTG TGA TG‐3′ and (reverse), 5′‐ATC ATT GRG AGT CAA CAG CTG TAT GTC‐3′; GAPDH (forward), 5′‐TGC ACC ACC AAC TGC TTA GC‐3′ and (reverse), 5′‐GGC ATG GAC TGT GGT CAT GAG‐3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Dental Stem Cell Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total protein of hDPSCs was collected and a BCA protein assay (Cwbio, Cambridge, MA, USA) was performed to measure the concentration. An amount of 20 μg of proteins was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: FBXO32 (1:1000; 67172-1-Ig, Proteintech, Wuhan, China), anti-DSPP antibody (1:1000; sc-73632, Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-DMP1 antibody (1:1000; NBP 1-45525, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA), anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1000; AF0006, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and anti-β-actin antibody (1:1000; AF0003, Beyotime). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:2000, Beyotime). The immunoreactive bands were detected using chemiluminescence detection reagents (Millipore) and visualized by a detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The intensities of each sample were quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated with TRI Reagent (Sigma Aldrich), and total RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's procedure. For real-time PCR, 500 ng total RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamer primers, deoxynucleoside triphosphates, MultiScribe reverse transcriptase, and RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). cDNA samples were diluted 1:10, and aliquots of 2 μl of the sample cDNA were mixed with SYBR Green JumpStart Taq ReadyMix (Sigma Aldrich), prevalidated primers, and diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water and were measured in duplicate for each sample. Primers used were fatty acid synthase (FAS), SREBP-1c, sterol-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1), PPARγ, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (Pck1). For sequences, see supplementary Table VIII. Expression analysis was performed using the BioRad detection system. Data were normalized to the housekeeping gene 18S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of LUCAT1 and KRAS Expressions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extracted from cells and tissues using the RNAPure Tissue & Cell Kit (DNase I) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (CWBIO, Beijing, China). Then, a total of 1 μg RNA was submitted to the reverse transcription of miRNA and mRNA using stem-loop primers and random primers with TaKaRa system (Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, the RT-PCR was carried out using a TaqMan Universal Master Mix II kit on a Bio-Rad detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). GAPDH and U6 expression levels are served as internal references to normalize mRNA and miRNA expressions, respectively. Primers were listed as follows.
LUCAT1: forward- (F-) 5′-CCTCACAAGAAGCTCACCCA-3′, reverse- (R-) 5′-CAGCATGTAGCCCATGGTAGA-3′; KRAS: F-5′-TAGGCAAGAGTGCCTTGACG-3′, R-5′-CCCTCCCCAGTCCTCATGTA-3′; and GAPDH: F-5′-CCACTAGGCGCTCACTGTTCTC-3′, R-5′-ACTCCGACCTTCACCTTCCC-3′. If the expression was lower than the median value, miR-181c-5p was considered as the low expression and vice versa. Similarly, LUCAT1 was considered to express at a high level when its expression was higher than the median value and vice versa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Quantification in RAW264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the protein expression, RAW264.7 cells were seeded at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells/plate in a 60π plate, and then subjected to pre-treatment for 1 h at 37 °C with and without LPS (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) and PUG treatment with 4 and 6 μM for 24 h. After this, RIPA buffer (iNtRON Biotechnology, Incheon, Korea) was added to the cells to lyse and harvest the protein. Then the concentration of protein was estimated by the Pierce™ BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). To separate the proteins, an equal concentration of protein (10 μg) was loaded in SDS-PAGE. Then the gel was transferred to PVDF membranes via a Semi-Dry Transfer unit (Atto Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The transferred membrane was then blocked for 1–2 h at room temperature with 5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and followed by incubation at 4 °C overnight with diluted (1:1000) primary antibodies. The membranes were washed with 1X TBST solution and probed with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) anti-mouse (cell signaling; cat. No. A90-116P) for β-actin and anti-rabbit (cell signaling; cat. No. A120-101P) to the rest of the proteins at room temperature for 2 h and washed again. Finally, the blots were detected under detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratory), after developing the ECL solution. Protein densitometry was evaluated using the ImageJ software program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Shrimp Transcriptional Response to WSSV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After shrimp tissues were collected at the 12 and 24 hpi time points, total RNA was extracted and subjected to cDNA synthesis by using Superscriptase II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and Anchor-dTv primer (Table 1). The cDNA samples were used to quantify the mRNA expression of the target genes by using real-time PCR with KAPA SYBR1 FAST Master Mix (KAPA) and the Bio-Rad detection system. The gene expression levels measured in this study were for the two GLS isoforms (GLS1 and GLS2), IDH1, IDH2, α-KGDH, the WSSV major structural gene VP28 and EF1α. The specific primer sets for each target gene are listed in Table 1. Data values were normalized to EF1α cDNA (internal control) and calculated by the 2−ΔCT method. Statistically significant differences between groups were analyzed by Student's t-test as described in Tseng et al. (19 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression in NP Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from human NP cells according to the protocol of TRIzol reagent (15596026, Invitrogen, USA) and RNA was reverse-transcribed using SuperScript cDNA synthesis kit (18080300, Invitrogen, USA). Forward and reverse primer sequences of MMP-3, 13, ADAMTS-4, 5, TNF-α, IL-6, AGG, and Col II are listed in Table 1. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was carried out in a Bio-Rad detection system (185-5196, Bio-Rad, China) with SYBR dye-based master mix (AB1220A, Thermo Scientific, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95˚C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 90 seconds and at 60°C for 45 seconds, and extended at 72°C for 90 seconds. GADPH served as endogenous control for the data and 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the expressions of target genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Real-Time PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First-strand cDNA was synthesized by using aliquots of 1 µg of total RNA from cortex and basal ganglia, reverse transcriptase and random primers [7] (link). Specific genes were quantified by real-time PCR using i-Cycler MYIQ system (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON). cDNA prepared from total RNA of cultured cells was diluted 1∶1 with sterile water and 5 µl were thereafter used per RT-PCR reaction. Semi-quantitative analysis was performed by monitoring in real time the increase of fluorescence of the SYBR Green dye on a Bio-Rad detection system, as previously reported [57] (link) and expressed as relative fold change (RFC) compared to control. Oligonucleotide primers are provided in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In vitro Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relevant protein levels of TGF-β1, Smad3, P-Smad3, Smad7, α-SMA and collagen-1 in vitro were measured by western blot. Cells incubated and treated in 6-well plates were lysed by 200 μL RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor (PMSF, 1 mM) and phosphatase inhibitor (TIANDZ 80809-1, 1%) on ice-bath for 30 min. And the lysate was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and the proteins were quantified by BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (anti-TGF-β1, 1:1000, Abcam, ab64715; anti-Smad3, 1:1000, Abcam, ab40854; anti-P-Smad3, 1:400, Bioss, BS-3425R; anti-Smad7, 1:400, Boster, BA1399; anti-α-SMA, 1:400, Boster, BM0002; anti-collagen1, 1:400, Boster, BA0325) overnight at 4 °C and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (1:500, Sinipept, 41302M) was used for loading control. After that HRP-goat-anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, World Biotech, WH-004) was incubated with membranes of TGF-β1, α-SMA and β-actin for 1 h at room temperature; HRP-goat-anti-rabbit antibody (1:1000, CW-biotech, cw-0103) with Smad3, P-Smad3, Smad7 and collagen-1 respectively. Immunoblot were visualized with Bio-Rad and recorded by Bio-Rad detection system, and gray density analysis was completed with the Image J program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!