The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lunar prodigy dxa scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner is a diagnostic imaging device used for the assessment of bone mineral density. It utilizes dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology to measure the amount of bone mineral content in various regions of the body, providing clinicians with information about bone health and the potential risk of osteoporosis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using lunar prodigy dxa scanner

1

DXA Reliability for Bone Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DXA measurements were performed using the Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner (GE Healthcare Inc, Madison USA) and analysed using the GE Encore software (version 1.6). The DXA machine was calibrated at the start of each testing day using a quality assurance block and a spine phantom. The DXA scanner exhibited high reliability for the assessment of lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC; CV = 0.6%), lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD; CV = 0.4%), and TBS (CV = 1.4%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bone Health Assessment in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the SWS, the child’s height (without shoes), using a stadiometer (Seca, Birmingham, UK), and weight (without shoes and wearing light clothing), using calibrated digital scales (Seca, Birmingham, UK), were measured. Similar measurements were taken in ALSPAC, using a stadiometer and a Tanita body fat analyser (Tanita Europe BV). The child’s age at the time of DXA assessment was also recorded. A Hologic Discovery DXA scanner was used in the SWS children (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), while a Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner was used in the ALSPAC (GE Healthcare, UK). Whole-body scans were obtained, generating data on bone indices. Coefficients of variation for whole body BMD were 0.75% and 0.84% in the SWS and ALSPAC, respectively. DXA scans were reviewed and those with excessive movement or clothing artefacts were omitted from the analysis. In the SWS, 1024 children underwent DXA assessment at 9 years, with 990 having useable images for analysis. In ALSPAC, 7722 children underwent 9-year DXA assessment, with 7333 having useable images for analysis. Bone outcomes of interest obtained directly from the DXA assessment were whole-body bone area (BA), whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) and whole-body areal bone mineral density (aBMD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Biometrics Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1cm using a Harpenden Stadiometer and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg using a Tanita TBF 305 scales. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by height (in meters squared). Total fat and lean body mass were determined by a DEXA scanner (Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner; GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Non-fasted blood was drawn and biochemistry analysis of glucose and cholesterol was undertaken following locally established procedures. A maturity offset was calculated based on the Mirwald equation26 (link) to assess maturation. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assigned based on paternal occupation in eight classes (1, higher managerial and professional through to 8, never worked and long-term unemployed)27 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner (GE Healthcare Inc., Wisconsin, USA) was used to measure aBMD (g/cm2), fat mass (g) and lean mass (g) at specific regions of the body. Four scans were performed to obtain data for the whole body, LS (L1–L4) and dual hip scans. All DXA scans and subsequent in-software analyses were completed by the same researcher, using the same DXA scanner and the enCORE software version 14.10.022 (GE Healthcare Inc., Wisconsin, USA). Despite the coefficient of variation was not determined in the present study, precision studies in paediatric population have shown DXA’s coefficient of variations of 0.74% for total body less head (TBLH) aBMD and 0.64% for LS aBMD in 14–16 years late teens [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were done in the morning (before 10 am). Participants were asked to fast for at least 8 h prior to measurements and to avoid any intentional physical activity at the morning of the examination.
DSMF-BIA: Measurements were obtained using a InBody 770 body composition analyzer (Cerritos, CA, USA) in the standing position. Thirty bioimpedance measurements were based on six different frequencies (1 kH, 5 kHz, 50 kHz, 250 kHz, 500 kHz, 1000 kHz) at each body segment (right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, and left leg).
DXA: DXA scan was performed using a Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). Regional lean mass (kg), total-body fat (kg), and total-body fat percentage (%) were calculated using enCORE 2010 software platform version 13.31.016. Scan modes (thick, standard, or thin) were automatically set by the software. Scan times lasted approximately 5–10 min. All scan analyses were performed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines by the same technician (blinded to allocation) using standard analysis modules. In addition to total-body composition, regional estimates were made for the arms, legs, and trunk. This was accomplished by manually adjusting cut positions for each region of interest (ROI).
Appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI) was calculated as the sum of the lean mass in the arms and legs divided by height squared (kg/m2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Anthropometric and Biochemical Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured unshod to nearest 0.1 cm using a Harpenden Stadiometer and weight was measured in light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg using a Tanita TBF 305 scales. Body mass index was calculated as weight (in kg)/height (in meters)2. Estimates of total fat and lean body mass were made by DEXA scanner (Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner; GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Blood draw following overnight fasting or a minimum of 6 h for afternoon/evening appointments, and biochemistry analysis of glucose and cholesterol including triglycerides, HDL, and LDL (not directly measured but calculated from total, HDL and triglycerides) cholesterol was undertaken following locally established procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DXA was performed when subjects were fasting (> 2 h), without shoes and jewellery and resting in a supine position using the LUNAR Prodigy DXA-Scanner (GE Medical Systems, Version 6.70.021; Prodigy en Core2002, 726 Heartland Trail, USA) at 38 keV and 70 keV [26 (link)] to determine total mass, fat-free mass (FFM) and FM by the EnCore2002 software according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Growth, Body Composition, and Picky Eating

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Growth data were collected by standardised routine measurements in annual clinics from ages 7 to 17 years (except ages 14 and 16 years). Age in months at clinic attendance was recorded.
Standing height was measured to the last complete millimetre using the Harpenden Stadiometer (Holtain Ltd, Crymych, UK) and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using the Tanita Body Fat Analyser (Model TBF 305, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Total body fat mass and total body lean mass was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) at ages 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 years. Scans with anomalies (movement artefacts, artefacts caused by jewellery) were excluded. Within the three groups of picky children (not picky, somewhat picky, very picky) at each age, the children were categorised into BMI groups (thin (underweight)/normal/overweight/obese) using age- and sex-specific cut-offs [27 (link), 28 (link)]. The three thinness (underweight) categories (grades 1–3) were elided to form a single category for thinness; the overweight and obese categories were also elided to form a single category.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Bone Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lumbar spine BMD (anterior-posterior; L2-L4) and femoral neck BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar Prodigy DXA scanner; GE Medical Systems, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and expressed in grams per square centimeter. Participant positioning and scan analysis procedures were standardized for all scans with CV < 0.01.
BMD was not measured in the hip fracture group (n = 92), a subgroup of the osteoporosis group, because the presence of hip fragility fracture met primary osteoporosis diagnostic criteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Longitudinal Bone Density Monitoring After TKA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DXA scans of the periprosthetic bone were performed within the first postoperative week (baseline), and at 1 and 2 years, and cross-sectionally at 5 to 7 years using a Lunar Prodigy DXA Scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). The patients were positioned supine with the leg in a foam frame to keep the knee semi-flexed by approximately 25° and the lower leg in neutral rotation (Stilling et al. 2010 (link)). Rice was applied around the knee as tissue-equivalent material and scans were performed with the “spine” mode. Analysis was performed in 3 regions of interest (ROI) (Figure 3) with a precision range from 1.8% to 3.7% for the anteroposterior scans, and from 3.4% to 6.2% for the lateral scans (Stilling et al. 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!