The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5d mark 4

Manufactured by Canon
Sourced in Japan

The Canon 5D Mark IV is a high-performance digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. It features a 30.4-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor, DIGIC 6+ image processor, and an autofocus system with 61 autofocus points. The camera is capable of capturing 4K video at 30 frames per second and can shoot at a maximum continuous shooting rate of 7 frames per second.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 5d mark 4

1

Vitrectomy Aerosol Evaluation in Cadaveric Eye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study adhered to the tenants of the Declaration of Helsinki. A fresh human cadaveric corneoscleral rim was obtained from the NHS Blood and Transplant for research purposes. The rim was fitted on a Coronet™ artificial anterior chamber (AAC) (Network Medical, Ripon, UK) and was mounted within a model head used for cataract training (Phillips Studio, Bristol, UK). A Constellation vitreoretinal surgery platform (Alcon, Camberley, UK) was set up for vitrectomy surgery. Three 25-gauge valved 4 mm cannulas were placed 2 mm behind the limbus, just anterior to the junction of the scleral rim and AAC (Fig. 1). Aerosol generation was assessed using high-speed 4K camera (Canon 5D mark IV, 100 mm prime macro lens; Canon, Tokyo, Japan, with a Hoya Pro1 Digital +3 Close-up lens; Kenko Tokina Co., Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a tripod and fixed lighting sources (Rotolight Neo II; Rotolight, Iver Heath, UK). Vitrectomy was performed at 7500 cuts per minute (cpm), a vacuum of 550 mmHg and an infusion pressure of 30 mmHg under the following experimental settings.Photograph showing the corneoscleral rim mounted on the anterior artificial chamber.

This is sited within a model head used for cataract training. A standard 25 g 3-port pars plana vitrectomy set up is used.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flap Necrosis Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 1, 3 and 7 days post-operation, photographs of the flaps were taken and analyzed with a digital camera (Canon 5D Mark IV, Japan). The necrotic areas were evaluated through the color, temperature, capillary reaction and elasticity of the flap using standard methods, evaluated individually by two dermatologic pathologists using a double-blind method.11 , 44 (link), 52 (link) The percentage of skin necrosis was calculated through dividing the necrotic area by the round area. Blood perfusion of the flap was measured with the infrared thermal imager (Ti450, Fluke, China) after 3 and 7 days post-operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Antennal Morphology of Insect Pests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photographs of the morphological characteristics of the antennae in the adults and nymphs were acquired using a Canon camera (5D Mark IV, Oitaken, Japan) equipped with a Canon EF 100 mm F/2.8L IS USM Macro Lens, with Godox MF12 Twin Flash used as a light source. Antennae were individually photographed under an ultra-depth-of-field 3D microscope (Keyence 1000, Osaka, Japan), and the pest parameters of each instar were determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Nerve Vasculature via Micro-CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preserved vasculature in the nerve segments was quantified using a SkyScan 1276 micro computed tomography (micro CT, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) to calculate the vascular volume (three dimensional) and a Canon 5D Mark IV camera, (Manual Mode, ISO 200, 1/200th of a sec, f/16), a Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens and a Canon MT-26-RT Twin Lite Macro strobe light source for calculating the vascular surface area (two dimensional), according to protocol19 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Taxonomic Diversity of Lucanus Beetles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens of Lucanus were netted or light-trap collected for this study and store in ethanol, including 54 samples of the ingroup (21 L.wuyishanensis collected from Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangxi province; 17 L.liuyei from Guangxi, Guizhou, Hunan province; five L.swinhoei from Taiwan; 11 L.continentalis from Fujian and Zhejiang province), and 10 samples of the outgroup (one each of L.parryi Boileau, 1899, L simithii Parry, 1862, L.fryi Boileau, 1911, L.klapperichi Bomans, 1989, and six L.fujianensis Schenk, 2008). Voucher specimens and their extracted genomic DNA are deposited in the research collection at the Museum of Anhui University, China. (Suppl. material 1).
The map with collection localities was generated using ArcGIS v. 10.3 (http://www.esri.com/sofware/arcgis) based on the geospatial data from the National Geomatics Center of China (Fig. 3). Photographs of the habitus was taken in .jpg format using a Canon 5D Mark IV with Canon 100 mm f/2.8 macro lens and a twin flash (Figs 1, 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Measurements of Alycaeid Shells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photographs of the shells and the habitats were taken using a Canon 5D Mark IV camera. The shells were measured with digital vernier calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. Whorls were counted as described by Kerney and Cameron (1979) . The terminology to describe alycaeid shells (Regions 1–3) follows Páll-Gergely et al. (2017) (link).
Abbreviations: a.s.l. – above sea level; D – shell breadth; H – shell height; HBUMM – mollusc collection of the Museum of Hebei University, Baoding, China; MNHNMuséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; R1 (Region 1) – from the beginning of the teleoconch to the beginning of the differently ribbed region along the suture; R2 (Region 2) – the differently ribbed area before the constriction; R3 (Region 3) – from the constriction to the peristome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nocturnal Moth Sampling with Light Traps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Moths were sampled using a 1000 W metal halide full-spectrum light and an ultraviolet 15 W blacklight next to a white canvas tarp. Specimens were not collected, but were photo-sampled. At each sampling event, lights were run for a single night in the summer during the peak flight period, June 25 to August 15. Lights were kept on from dusk until 2 a.m. Surveys were not conducted on nights when it rained >0.5” during the day, as previous experience had shown that this reduced nocturnal moth activity.
To facilitate identifications, high-quality photos were taken of moths at rest on the white canvas sheet using a Canon 5D Mark IV camera, with a 100 mm macro EF L series lens. Moths were photographed both dorsally and laterally when possible. All moths were identified to a species or species group using photo vouchers, either during the sampling event or at a later time. Identifications were performed by non-specialists using Beadle and Leckie [66 ] and Moth Photographer’s Group: (https://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/ accessed on 25 June 2015–27 July 2020). The time spent in species identifications (post-sampling) ranged from 2–4 h per site. All moth data can be found in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacillus subtilis Growth and Coculture Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B. subtilis cells grown in 5 ml LB broth were diluted to an OD600 of 0.08. When grown to an OD600 of 1.0, 1.5 μL of B. subtilis cells were spotted on the GYM7 plate with or without 1 μM chloramphenicol. Pictures were taken with Nikon D60 digital camera. For the luciferase reporter assays, images were captured with an Amersham imager 600, or Canon 5D Mark IV (Brake et al., 2021 (link)). For the coculture assay, 2.5 μL of Streptomyces venezuelae spores (107 spores/mL) and 1.5 μL of B. subtilis (OD600=1.0, equal to 108 cells/mL) cells were spotted in a cross pattern with a distance of 1 cm between spots for each species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!