The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using rabbit anti il 10

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 μm-thick FFPE tissue sections as previously indicated1 (link),39 (link). Tissues were stained with combinations of primary antibodies including polyclonal rabbit anti-IFNγ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit anti-TNF (Bioss Antibodies, Boston, MA), rabbit anti-IL-4 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-10 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CD3 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), mouse anti-calprotectin (clone: MAC378, ThermoFisher), mouse anti-CD163 (clone: 1D6, ThermoFisher), and mouse anti-human alveolar macrophage antibody (HAM56, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Tissues were subsequently stained with appropriate anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 hr at room temp, and coverslips were mounted with DAPI-containing Prolong Gold mounting medium (ThermoFisher). Cells were imaged on an Olympus confocal microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA) running FlowView 1000 software maintained by the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, or a Nikon e1000 epifluorescence microscope running Nikon Elements (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY). Images were annotated with Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and projections of z-stacks were made with the FIJI build of ImageJ42 (link). Quantitative image analysis was performed with CellProfiler43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exosome Uptake and Cytokine Expression in Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect macrophages that had incorporated exosomes, RAW264.7 cells were co-cultured with PKH67- (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck-KGaA) labeled exosomes for 12 h at 37°C, and subsequently fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min at 37°C and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X. Cells were imaged using a confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH; magnification, ×100) after counter-staining cells with DAPI (1 mg/ml) at room temperature for 5 min.
To detect the expression levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in CD68-positive cells, the sections were prepared as described for immunohistochemistry and incubated at 4°C overnight with mouse anti-CD68 (1:200; cat. no. ab955; Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-10 (1:200; cat. no. ab34843; Abcam;) or rabbit anti-IL-6 (1:200; cat. no. ab9324; Abcam) and goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) unconjugated or goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) unconjugated secondary antibodies (1:5,000; cat. nos. BS13271 and BS12471; Biogot Technology Co., Ltd.) for 2 h at 37°C. Cells were counter-stained with DAPI (100 ng/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. Co-localization of CD68 with IL-6 or IL-10 was determined using an Olympus fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the mice were sacrificed under deep anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium (1% in NS, 50 mg/kg, i.p.), the lumbar spinal cord segments were quickly extracted and stored in liquid nitrogen. The collected tissue samples were weighed, homogenized in lysis buffer, and centrifuged. Then the supernatant was collected. Protein samples were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto the polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 2 h at room temperature and incubated with the primary antibodies: rabbit anti-iNOS (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-arginase I (1:600, Santa Cruz, CA), rabbit anti-IL-1β (1:700, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and rabbit anti-IL-10 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then washed with TBST and incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature with peroxidase affinipure goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:10000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc, West Grove, USA). Then, the membranes were visualized using a chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore Corporation, MA, USA) in an automated chemiluminescence system (Tanon, Shanghai, China). β-actin was used as a loading control for total protein, and ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the gray value of each band.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lumbar spinal cords were immediately harvested after extensive perfusion on day 19 p.i., fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and cut into 5-μm-slices for immunofluorescence assay. Briefly, non-specific binding was blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Serotec, United Kingdom) and permeated with 0.3% Triton X-100 in 1% BSA-PBS for 30 min. Slides were then incubated with primary antibodies-mouse anti-CD4, mouse anti-CD11b (both IgG; Proteintech, Wuhan, China), rabbit anti-IFN-β, rabbit anti-IL-10 and rabbit anti-IL-27 (all IgG; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in blocking solution overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with corresponding secondary antibodies-goat anti-rabbit Cy3 conjugate (IgG; Proteintech, Wuhan, China) and donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (IgG; Jackson ImmunoResearch, PA, United States) for 2 h at room temperature. After three additional washes with PBS, samples were counterstained with DAPI for 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), washed with PBS and mounted. Images were captured by confocal microscope (Olympus FluoView FV1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 μm-thick FFPE tissue sections as previously indicated1 (link),39 (link). Tissues were stained with combinations of primary antibodies including polyclonal rabbit anti-IFNγ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit anti-TNF (Bioss Antibodies, Boston, MA), rabbit anti-IL-4 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-10 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CD3 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), mouse anti-calprotectin (clone: MAC378, ThermoFisher), mouse anti-CD163 (clone: 1D6, ThermoFisher), and mouse anti-human alveolar macrophage antibody (HAM56, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Tissues were subsequently stained with appropriate anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 hr at room temp, and coverslips were mounted with DAPI-containing Prolong Gold mounting medium (ThermoFisher). Cells were imaged on an Olympus confocal microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA) running FlowView 1000 software maintained by the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, or a Nikon e1000 epifluorescence microscope running Nikon Elements (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY). Images were annotated with Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and projections of z-stacks were made with the FIJI build of ImageJ42 (link). Quantitative image analysis was performed with CellProfiler43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemistry Markers for Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit anti-Iba1 was from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Mouse anti-CD11c, rabbit anti-CX3CR1, rabbit anti-CCR2, rabbit anti-iNOS, rabbit anti-CD86, rabbit anti-macrophage scavenger receptor I (SCAR1), rabbit anti-IFN-γ, rabbit anti-GM-CSF, rabbit anti-IL-4, rabbit anti-IL-10, goat anti-liver arginase (Arg1), and mouse anti-rat endothelial cell antigen (RECA) antibodies were from Abcam (MA, USA). Anti-CD163 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody was from Thermo Scientific (MA, USA). Anti-VEGFR2 antibody was from Cell Signaling Technology (MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!