The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Miseq dna

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The MiSeq is a desktop DNA sequencing system designed for targeted resequencing, metagenomics, and small genome studies. It provides rapid, high-quality sequencing data for a range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using miseq dna

1

Gut Microbiome Profiling by 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gut microbiota in the cecal content was analyzed as described in our previous report (4 (link)). Briefly, primers specific for 16S rRNA V4-V5 region (Forward: 515F: 5’-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA - 3’ and Reverse: 806R: 5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’) that contained Illumina 3’ adapter sequences, as well as a 12-bp barcode were used. Sequences were generated by an Illumina MiSeq DNA platform at Argonne National Laboratory and analyzed by the program Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) (24 (link)). Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were picked at 97% sequence identity using open reference OTU picking against the Greengenes database (25 (link)). Representative sequences were aligned via PyNAST, taxonomy assigned using the RDP Classifier, and a phylogenetic tree was built using FastTree.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Eukaryotic 18S rDNA Pyrosequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tag pyrosequencing of 18S rDNA was performed using PCR amplification of the V2 and V3 region and by using the two eukaryotic primers 18S-82F (5′-GAAACTGCGAATGGCTC-3′) (Lopez-Garcia et al., 2003 (link)) and Euk-516r (5′-ACCAGACTTGCCCTCC-3′) (Amann et al., 1990 (link)). These primers were designed to amplify 470–480 bp in the region. Furthermore, cDNA (representing RNA) was amplified using the same primer pair targeting the same region. PCR reactions and barcode amplicon sequencing process described by Dowd et al. (2008) (link) was performed by the Mr. DNA Company (Shallowater, TX, United States)1. Briefly, PCR conditions included a denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of amplification that were performed at 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min. A final extension step was performed for 7 min at 72°C. Subsequently, PCR products were purified using calibrated Ampure XP beads and the purified products were used to prepare the DNA libraries by following the Illumina MiSeq DNA high-throughput library preparation protocol. DNA library preparation and sequencing was performed at Mr. DNA (Shallowater, TX, United States)2 on a MiSeq following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Sequences were submitted to GenBank-SRA under the accession number SRX3222420.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Bacterial Communities via 16S rRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess bacterial community structure, primers specific for 16S rRNA V4-V5 region (forward: 338F: 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′ and reverse: 806R: 5′-GGAC-TACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) that contained Illumina 3′ adapter sequences, as well as a 12-bp barcode were used. Sequences were generated by an Illumina MiSeq DNA platform at Argonne National Laboratory and analyzed by the program Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME).25 (link) Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were picked at 97% sequence identity using open reference OTU picking against the Greengenes database (May 2013 release).26 (link) OTUs were quality-filtered based on default parameters set in the open-reference OTU command in QIIME and sequences were rarified to an equal sampling depth of 30,000 reads per sample for all saline control samples. We were unable to assess 16S taxonomic structure in antibiotic samples due to low abundance 16S rRNA. Representative sequences were aligned via PyNAST,25 (link) taxonomy assigned using the RDP Classifier,27 (link) and a phylogenetic tree was built using FastTree.28 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gut Microbiome Profiling by 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gut microbiota in the cecal content was analyzed as described in our previous report (4 (link)). Briefly, primers specific for 16S rRNA V4-V5 region (Forward: 515F: 5’-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA - 3’ and Reverse: 806R: 5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’) that contained Illumina 3’ adapter sequences, as well as a 12-bp barcode were used. Sequences were generated by an Illumina MiSeq DNA platform at Argonne National Laboratory and analyzed by the program Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) (24 (link)). Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were picked at 97% sequence identity using open reference OTU picking against the Greengenes database (25 (link)). Representative sequences were aligned via PyNAST, taxonomy assigned using the RDP Classifier, and a phylogenetic tree was built using FastTree.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole-genome sequencing and MLST of Campylobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A library from the isolated chromosomal DNA was prepared with a Nextera XT (Illumina, USA) kit and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq DNA sequencer using an Illumina V3 (600 cycles) kit. The average coverage was 861x. Assembly occurred with the MyPro pipeline [60 (link)] and the contigs were further assembled with Geneious 8 software (Geneious, Auckland, New Zealand). Validity of the assembled larger contigs were tested by remapping the reads. The accession number of the deposited genome is under the Bioproject PRJNA385384, with AMN06888245 NEWH00000000; Biosample SAMN06888245. For multilocus sequence typing (MLST), sequences of the seven housekeeping genes (aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, and uncA) were uploaded to https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_campylobacter_seqdef&page=sequenceQuery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!