The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Trace 1300

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Italy, Belgium, United Kingdom, Austria, Germany

The Thermo Scientific Trace 1300 Gas Chromatograph is a high-performance analytical instrument designed for gas chromatography applications. It features a compact design and advanced technology to provide accurate and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

145 protocols using trace 1300

1

Biogas Composition and Isotope Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the effluent samples, DAN was determined using an auto discrete analyzer (AQ2, SEAL Analytical, UK). DOC was analyzed on a total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-V CPH, Shimadzu, Japan). VFAs (including acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate) were determined using a gas chromatograph (TRACE 1300; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector. The FAN concentration was calculated using equation 1 (44 (link)):
FAN=(TAN ×10pH)/(exp{6,334273+T}+10pH) The volume of biogas collected was measured with a gas flowmeter (SQB-0.5; Yibin Mechatronics Research Institute, China), and the composition (CH4, CO2, and H2) was analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Trace1300; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a thermal conductivity detector. The stable carbon isotope (13C) signatures of methane (δ13CH4) and carbon dioxide (δ13CO2) in biogas samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Trace Ultra GC; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) coupled with a stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). αC was calculated by using equation 2 (45 (link)):
αC=(δ13CO2+1,000)/(δ13CH4+1,000)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rumen Fluid Analysis in Lambs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lambs were weighted on two consecutive days after they were reared in individual units for 50 days. Then, ruminal fluid was collected from each lamb by use of an orogastric tube 2–4 h after morning feeding. The ruminal fluid was mixed thoroughly and filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth.
The ruminal fluid pH was immediately determined using a pH meter. An 8 mL aliquot of ruminal fluid was preserved with adding 1 mL of metaphosphoric acid (25% wt/vol) to determine volatile fatty acid (VFA) content. The rest of the samples were stored at -20°C for bacteria DNA extraction. For VFA determination, thawed samples of the rumen fluid were centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 × g at 4°C. Two milliliters of the supernatant were then mixed with 200 μL crotonic acid (1% wt/vol), and the solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. The ruminal VFAs were separated and quantified by using a gas chromatograph (Trace 1300, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) as described by Li et al. (2014) (link), using a 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.33 μm fused silica column (DB-FFAP, Agilent Technologies, United States). Lactate concentrations in the ruminal fluid were determined using commercially available lactate assay kits (A019-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Cecal Volatile Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VFA was analyzed as previously described [14 (link)]. Briefly, 200 mg of cecal content was weighed in the Eppendorf tube. Then the final volume of 1,500 μL was created by adding deionized water (1,100 μL), trimethyl acetic acid (100 μL), and metaphosphoric acid (100 μL). Following homogenization with a vortex, materials were centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 r/min at 4 °C. A Gas Chromatography system (TRACE 1300; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and supernatants (1,000 μL) were used to analyze VFA in the samples. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a 15.5 mL/min rate. Each sample's run duration was 17.5 min, with an injection volume of 0.5 μL. The initial temperature regimen was 120 °C for 4 min, followed by a 4 °C/min increase to 160 °C. 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mmol/L of the standard stock solution mixture containing formic, acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, valeric, isocaproic, hexanoic, and n-caproic acids were used. The software Chromeleon™ 7.2 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for data management and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Headspace GC-TCD Analysis of Gases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gas samples from four biological replicates were collected from the headspace culture bottles using 10 mL gas tight syringes at different interval times. At each time point, the sample was injected into a gas chromatograph TRACE 1300 (Thermo Scientific, Paisley, UK) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) and a 250 μL of sample was injected into the column. Separation was achieved using a precolumn Haysep Q (60–80) column with 2 m × 1/16 SS packing connected with Molsieve 5A (60–80) column with 2 m × 1/16 SS packing. Argon was used as carrier at 36.25 psi pressure. Each GC run was performed for 13 min using a temperature gradient (with a hold at 50 °C for 2.5 min, followed by a ramp at a rate of 20 °C/min to 70 °C for 45 s, then hold at 70 °C for next 8.35 min and finally ramp of 1 min up to 150 °C). The detector and valve oven temperatures were 150 and 80 °C, respectively. The GC was controlled and automated by the Chromeleon software (Dionex, Version 7). The instrument was calibrated using hydrogen gas standards of 10, 30 and 40 % (v/v) from BOC (Guildford, Surrey, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fatty Acid Profile Analysis by GC-FID

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acids were determined by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID) using a chromatograph (Thermo Scientific TRACE 1300, Milano, Italy) and a fused silica capillary column (TG-POLAR, Thermo Scientific, 60 m, 0.25 mm and 0.2 μm). Hydrogen was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 3 mL/min. To perform the analysis, 50 mg of oil was mixed with 4 mL of hexane, to which 150 μL of KOH solution (2 M in methanol) was added. The mixture was shaken for 10 min at ambient conditions and the upper layer was transferred to the GC vials. A volume of 1 μL was injected into the column through a split injector (1 of 10 μL) heated at 260 °C. Once injected, the sample passed through a column with the following temperature gradient: 50 °C for 1 min, 175 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min and 250 °C at 1 °C/min. The fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) of the samples were identified by comparing their retention times with standards (SUPELCO FAMEs Mix GLC-30; Sigma Aldrich, Milano, Italy). The determination was performed by measuring the area, expressed as percentage of normalized areas of the total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GC-MS/MS Analysis of O. vulgare Essential Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The O. vulgare essential oil (O-EO) was diluted with dichloromethane, and 1 μL of the sample was analyzed using a GC-MS/MS, Thermo Scientific (GC: model Trace 1300 and MS: model TSQ8000Evo) operating in EI mode at 70 eV, equipped with a splitless injector (250 °C). The transfer line temperature was 250 °C. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a rate of 1.2 mL/min, and the capillary column used was a Rtx-5 ms (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm). The temperature program was 40 °C (5 min) to 300 °C (5 min) at a rate of 5 °C/min. The chemical composition of the oil was identified by comparing its spectra with an NIST14 library and confirmed by contrasting the retention indices with data published in other studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fatty Acid Profiling by Gas Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acids were esterified with a mixture of 2 M KOH in methanol. Methyl esters of fatty acids were analyzed in a gas chromatograph (TRACE™ 1300, Thermo Scientific) equipped with a flame ionization detector. The separation process was carried out on a capillary column RTX-2330 (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 μm, Restek). The oven temperature was set at 50 °C (3 min); the temperature increase rate was 3 °C/min up to 250 °C (5 min). Nitrogen (1.6 mL/min) was the carrier gas. The temperatures of the injector and detector were set at 230 °C and 260 °C, respectively. The fatty acids were identified on the basis of standard retention time (Nu-Chek Prep, Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photocatalytic water-splitting experiments were performed in a 10 mL quartz test tube equipped with a rubber stopper. A 350 W xenon lamp with a 400 nm optical filter was regarded as a light source at a distance of 10 cm away from the photocatalytic reactor. In a typical photocatalytic experiment, 10 mg catalyst was dispersed in 5 mL aqueous solution containing 0.5 mL triethanolamine as a sacrificial agent. Additionally, 0.5 mL potassium tetrachloroplatinate (II) (K2PtCl4) was added into the hybrid solution with 1 wt % of Pt cocatalyst to photocatalyst. To provide an anaerobic environment, the reaction system was adequately removed from the dissolved oxygen by discharging Ar for 30 min and then sealing with paraffin. In order to keep the sample in suspension status, the photocatalyst was stirred continuously by a magnetic stirrer during the whole experiment. The reaction was monitored for 4 h, and 0.2ml of gas was sampled at intervals of an hour through the septum to analyze by gas chromatography (TRACE 1300, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, TCD, 5Å molecular sieve column).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Ethylene Production in Mangoes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The production of ethylene was determined following the procedures described by Chen et al. with minor modifications (Chen et al., 2022 (link)). Three mango fruit were weighed and sealed in a 12 l airtight jar for 2 h at 25°C. Three 1 ml gas samples were collected from each vessel by syringe and injected into a gas chromatograph (Agilent 5,181–1,267, Palo Alto, CA, United States) equipped with a flame ionization detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, TRACE 1300, United States). The peaks were compared to the standard gas sample of ethylene. Ethylene production was calculated and expressed as μL g−1 h−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Analysis of Chemical Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were analyzed using a Thermo-Scientific Trace 1300 gas chromatography
instrument attached with Thermo-Scientific ISQ QD single quadrupole mass spectrophotometer
following a previously standardized method.17 20 (no links found) The gas chromatography system was equipped with TG-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm ×
0.25 μm). The inlet temperature was maintained at 250°C. The initial temperature was set
at 60°C (solvent delay 5 minutes) with a hold of 4 minutes, followed by a ramp of 5°C/min
to 290°C with a hold of 10 minutes (60-minute program). Samples (1 μL) were injected in a
splitless mode (split flow 50 mL/min) with splitless time of 0.80 minutes, using a
Thermo-Scientific AI-1310 auto-sampler. The carrier gas was helium (99.99%), with a
constant flow of 1 mL/min, passed through hydrocarbon and dehydrating columns. Mass
spectrometry transfer line temperature was set at 290°C with an ion source temperature of
230°C (electron ionization). The individual samples were analyzed at electron energy 70 eV
(vacuum pressure = 2.21e-0.5 Torr). The mass analyzer range was set to 50 to 650 atomic
mass unit (amu). All samples were analyzed thrice for confirmation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!