The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nextseq 500 550 high output kit v2.5 300 cycles

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles) is a laboratory equipment product from Illumina. It is designed to be used with the NextSeq 500 and NextSeq 550 sequencing systems. The kit provides the necessary reagents and consumables to perform 300 sequencing cycles on the respective instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using nextseq 500 550 high output kit v2.5 300 cycles

1

Evaluating CUTseq for Exome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test whether CUTseq can be used for exome sequencing, we extracted gDNA from SKBR3 cells and two FFPE breast samples (TRN16 and TRN17, see Supplementary Table 2). For SKBR3 cell sample, we prepared two CUTseq libraries as well as two reference libraries using the SureSelect XT HS Kit (Agilent Technologies, catalog number G9704A). For the two FFPE breast samples, we prepared one CUTseq library and one reference library for each. The amount of gDNA input was 50 ng in all the cases. We then performed exome capture using the SureSelect XT HS Target Enrichment kit and SureSelect Human All Exon v6 baits (Agilent Technologies, catalog number G9704K) on all libraries following the manufacturer’s protocol. We analyzed all the captured libraries on Bioanalyzer and sequenced them using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output v2.5 kit 300 cycles (Illumina, catalog number 20024908).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic Response to Potato Blight Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three biological replicates were used for each cultivar analyzed, and the leaf samples were taken before and 24 h after inoculation with P. infestans. Total RNA was extracted with an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
The quality of the RNA samples was evaluated using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All samples had RIN 7.8 or higher. RNAseq library preparations were carried out with 1.5 µg of total RNA fraction using TruSeq ® Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions for barcoded libraries with small modifications (4 min RNA fragmentation time and 12 PCR cycles were used). Final libraries quantification was performed with a Bioanalyzer 2100 and a DNA High Sensitivity Kit (Agilent). After normalization, barcoded libraries were pooled and sequenced on a NextSeq 550 sequencer 2 × 150 bp using NextSeq ® 500/550 High Output v2.5 Kit 300 cycles (Illumina).
Raw sequencing data were deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (PRJNA765923).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic Analysis of Campylobacter Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular analysis, whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics were performed as described by Tedersoo et al. [25 (link)]. In brief, the sequencing was carried out on an Illumina NextSeq500 System (Illumina, Inc.; San Diego, CA, USA) using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles) in paired-end 2 × 151 bp mode. All genome sequences were submitted to the C. jejuni/C. coli multilocus sequence typing (MLST) database [27 (link)].
Antimicrobial resistance genes and point mutations of C. jejuni (n = 27) and C. coli (n = 8) isolates previously assigned as resistant with the MIC test were detected in the subset of isolates. MIC-sensitive campylobacters were not included in the analysis and only genotypic resistance mechanisms corresponding to phenotypic AMR were identified and reported in present study. AMRFinderPlus v3.10.23 with database v2021-12-21.1 (downloaded 3 March 2022) was used according to the default settings, except for the organism “Campylobacter” and the “plus” options [28 (link),29 (link)]. Genes with coverage of less than 80% were not included in the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

TP53 Gene Mutation NGS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TP53 gene mutation analysis was performed using a KAPA HyperChoice customized Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel (Roche Diagnostic Spa, Monza, Italy).
Samples libraries were prepared from 300 ng of DNA input using the KAPA HyperCap FFPET DNA workflow v1.1 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Diagnostic Spa, Monza, Italy). The quantity and quality of the libraries were checked with a QuBit dsDNA HS Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy) and a High Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape Assay kit (Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy), respectively. Enriched libraries were pooled and sequenced with NextSeqTM 550 using a NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 cycles) (Illumina, Milan, Italy).
Reads obtained were aligned to the reference genome and sequencing data were validated with JuliaOmixTM software v2.21.0 (GenomeUp, Rome, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Shotgun Sequencing of Captured Libraries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA of the captured libraries was quantifed and quality verified for sequencing by QuantiFluor® dsDNA System (Promega Madison (Wis), USA) and Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Analysis System (Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara (CA), USA), respectively. Shotgun sequencing of the captured libraries was performed using a Nextseq 500 Illumina platform (Illumina Inc. San Diego (CA), USA) and ran with a NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles), paired-end: R1:150; R2:150.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metatranscriptome Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total nucleic acids were extracted using a phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol protocol [40 (link)]. The extracts were subsequently treated with DNase to remove DNA (DNase I, Zymo Research, Freiburg, Germany). RNA concentrations were measured with the Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit (Qubit3.0 Fluorometer, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA.). RNA extracts were cleaned with the MEGAclear kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); the quality of the RNA was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and bioanalyzer (2100 Bioanalyzer, Agilent, Santa Clara CA, USA). We enriched the mRNA fraction and diluted inhibitory substances in the RNA extracts using the MessageAmp II-Bacteria RNA Amplification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA, input: 12.5 ng RNA). This method was previously validated for the preparation of metatranscriptomes [55 (link)]. Sequencing libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA; input 60 ng). Manufacturer’s instructions were followed except for Step 4, where fragmentation time was adjusted to 3 min and a size selection step with HighPrep PCR beads (MagBio Genomics Inc., Gaithersburg, USA) was introduced (desired insert size 250 bp). Libraries were paired-end sequenced with a NextSeq 550 System using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Oncology Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Pooled Amplicon Libraries from 8 DNA and 8 RNA libraries were loaded on a NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles) and paired-end (2 × 101 bp) sequenced on a NextSeq500 instrument (Illumina). Data were analyzed with the TSO500 Local App v2.0 (Illumina) according to the user guide (TruSight Oncology 500 v2.0 Local App User Guide (1000000095997) (illumina.com; accessed on 5 May 2022)). It is important to note that deduplication is performed based on UMIs to remove all duplicate reads. Therefore, the indicated coverages are based on the unique reads only. DNA and RNA degradation was checked by calculating the mean amplicon insert size and deamination by analysis of the frequency of C > T; G > A changes. TMB was calculated as the total number of somatic non-hotspot variants with VAF > 5% per Mb of interrogated sequence. For MSI analysis, at least 40 MSI sites need to be interrogated. All passed-filter data including TMB, MSI, gene amplifications, splice variants, fusions, and small variants (SNVs and indels) are provided in the CombinedVariantOutput.tsv file of each sample. Only these data were considered for validation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!