The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti il 9

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of Colonic Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryosections of colonic tissue were stained with H&E [haematoxylin [DAKO] and eosin [Sigma-Aldrich]]. For immunofluorescence staining, tissue sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS or methanol, followed by Protein Block [DAKO]. For intracellular markers, sections were permeabilised with perm buffer [Ebioscience] for 20 min at 18°C. Staining was performed with the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: anti-CD3 [Ebioscience, 1:50], anti-IL-9R [Acris, 1:50], anti-Ki67 [DAKO, 1:50], anti-PU.1 [ThermoScientific, 1:50], anti-IL-9 [Biolegend, 1:50], anti-CD4 [Biolegend, 1:200], anti-IL-6 [Biolegend, 1:50], anti-claudin2 [1:200, Invitrogen], anti-claudin3 [1:100, Invitrogen], anti-SOCS3 [Invitrogen, 1:50], and anti-pSTAT3 [Cell Signaling, 1:50]. For staining of human cryosections the following antibodies were used: anti-CD3 [Ebioscience, 1.50], anti-IL-9 [BioLegend, 1:50], anti –PU.1 [ThermoScientific, 1:50], and anti-CD4 [Biolegend, 1:50]. Sections were then incubated with the secondary antibodies anti-rabbit Alexa488, anti-rabbit Alexa594, anti-rat Alexa488, or anti-rat Alexa555 [Invitrogen] and counterstained with DAPI [Vektor]. Image acquisition was performed on a confocal microscope [Leica]. Positive cells in high-power fields were counted in all samples per condition. Antibodies used are registered in Supplementary Figure 2].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric flow cytometry of T-cell subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used flow cytometry analysis to assess the production of FOXP3, Helios, GATA3, IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-10 by CXCR6+ and CD4+ T cells. Briefly, splenocytes were incubated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)/ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h in the presence of brefeldin-A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences), which prevents the transport of cytokines and transcription factors out of the cell [12 (link),33 (link),41 (link)]. Cells were washed and surface stained for CD4, and CXCR6 surface receptors (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). After permeabilization and fixation (BioLegend), the cells were stained with intracellular cytokines (anti-IL-9, anti-IL-10, and anti-IL-17A; BioLegend) and transcription factors (anti-FOXP3, anti-GATA3, and anti-Helios; BioLegend). The proportions of CXCR6+FOXP3+, CXCR6+Helios+, CD4+GATA3+, CD4+IL-9+, CXCR6+IL-10+, and CD4+IL-17A+ cells were acquired via a FC 500 flow cytometer and analyzed using CXP software (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Panel for Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used rabbit anti-ESAT-6 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), mouse anti-His6X antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MA), anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MA), HRP conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA), anti-rabbit FITC conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson-ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and anti-mouse Texas Red secondary antibody (Jackson-ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for in vitro studies. For in vivo studies, anti-CD4 (clone: GK1.5)-FITC, -PerCP-Cy5 or -APC, anti-CD8 (clone: 53–6.7)-FITC, -PerCP-Cy5 or -APC, anti-CD44 (clone: IM7)-APC, anti-Brdu (clone: Bu20a)-PE, anti-CD11b (clone: M1/70)-APC, anti-CD11c (clone: N418)-APC, 7AAD, anti-IFN-γ (clone: XMG1.2)-APC, anti-IL-17 (clone: TC11-18H10.1)-PE, anti-IL-4 (clone: 11B11)-PE, anti-IL-6 (clone: MPS-20 F3)-PE, anti-IL-12 (clone: C15.6)-PE, anti-IL-22 (clone: Poly5164)-PE, anti-IL-10 (clone: JES5-16E3)-PE, anti-IL-9 (clone: MH9A4)-PE, anti-TNF-α (clone: MP6-XT22)-PE, (all from Biolegend, USA) and anti-CD69 (clone: H1.2 F3)-PE (from eBiosciences, USA) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the following antibodies: anti-CD4 (clone: GK1.5)-FITC, -PerCP-Cy5, or -APC, anti-CD8 (clone: 53-6.7)-FITC, -PerCP-Cy5, or -APC, anti-CD44 (clone: IM7)-APC, anti-BrdU (clone: Bu20a)-PE, 7AAD, anti-IFN-γ (clone: XMG1.2)-APC, anti-IL-17 (clone: TC11-18H10.1)-PE, anti-IL-4 (clone: 11B11)-PE, anti-IL-6 (clone: MPS-20F3)-PE, anti-IL-12 (clone: C15.6)-PE, anti-IL-22 (clone: Poly5164)-PE, anti-IL-10 (clone: JES5-16E3)-PE, anti-IL-9 (clone: MH9A4)-PE, anti-TNF-α (clone: MP6-XT22)-PE (all from Biolegend, USA), anti-Active Caspase-3 (clone: C92-605)-FITC or -PE (from BD Pharmingen™, USA), and anti-CD69 (clone: H1.2F3)-PE (from eBiosciences, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Colorectal Cancer and Tumor Xenograft Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To construct the CRC model, mice (6-weeks-old) received a single intraperitoneal injection of AOM (Ray Biotech, Guangzhou, China) at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight. At 7 days after the AOM injection, mice were administered drinking water with 2% DSS (Novus, Centennial, USA) for 7 days, followed by DSS-free drinking water for 14 days. After this 21-day treatment was repeated for ve cycles, the CRC mice model were sacri ced and tumor tissues were harvested for subsequent analysis.
For the CT26 transplantation model, 1 × 10 6 CT26 cells were implanted in mice by subcutaneous injection. Five days after CT26 transplantation, anti-CD90.2 (Biolegend, CA, USA), anti-IL-9 (Biolegend), or IL-9 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, USA) were administrated to the CT26 cell-bearing mice to intervene the tumor growth through tail vein injection. The tumor length (L), diameter and width (W) were tested with a vernier calipers, and tumor volumes were calculated using the formula V = π × L × W2/6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!