The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pharmdx assay

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The PharmDx assay is a laboratory equipment product developed by Agilent Technologies. It is designed to perform quantitative analysis of specific analytes in samples. The core function of the PharmDx assay is to provide accurate and reliable measurements for various applications, but a detailed description of its intended use is not available in this context.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using pharmdx assay

1

PD-L1 Expression Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMAs were sectioned at a thickness of 4-μm and stained using the Dako pharmDx assay. Briefly, the slides were stained with anti-PD-L1 22C3 mouse monoclonal primary antibodies with the EnVision FLEX visualization system on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 instrument (Carpinteria, CA, USA), along with negative control reagents and cell line run controls, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The IHC slides were scored independently by two pathologists (H.J. Kwon and H. Kim). PD-L1 was considered positive in tumor cells only in cases of at least 100 viable tumor cells, if membranous staining alone or membranous and cytoplasmic staining together was present. Membranous staining in tumor cells directly adjacent to immune cells was not considered positive if the surface touching immune cells was the only stained part. The percentage of stained cells in the overall area of the tumor (Tumor Proportion Score) was scored regardless of intensity [6 (link)]. Cases were then classified by two different cut-off values, 1% and 50%, based on the published association of this cut-off with anti-PD-1 therapeutic response [6 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of biopsy or surgical specimens were used for IHC. The PharmDx assay (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) was utilized, using an anti-PD-L1 22C3 mouse monoclonal primary antibody and EnVision FLEX visualization system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) on an Autostainer Link 48 system (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) along with negative control reagents and cell line run controls, as per the manufacturers’ instructions23 (link),24 (link). PD-L1 staining was defined as complete or partial circumferential linear cellular membrane staining at any intensity that could be differentiated from the background as well as diffuse cytoplasmic staining23 (link),25 (link). Tonsillar tissue was used as a positive internal control23 (link). Positivity of PD-L1 status was determined based on a 1% threshold in tumor cells. A TPS was recorded as the overall percentage of PD-L1 stained tumor cells relative to the entire tumor area26 (link). A CPS was recorded based on the number of PD-L1 positive tumor and immune cells in relation to total tumor cells26 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Assessment of PD-L1 in HCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) on archive HCC tissues for 18 patients. The anti-PD-L1 28-8 antibody was used for nivolumab-treated HCC, and anti-PD-L1 22C3 antibody was applied for pembrolizumab-treated HCC [7 (link),8 (link)]. Expression levels were reported by tumor proportion score (TPS) and/or combined positive score (CPS), respectively [7 (link),8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of p-β-catenin and PD-L1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemistry experiment was carried out following the guidelines of our previous study. The primary antibody to p-β-cateninTyr654 was diluted to 1:50 (Rabbit polyclonal antibody, Catalogue ab59430; abcam Cambridge, UK). PD-L1 (anti-human PD-L1 antibody, clone 22C3; pharmDx assay Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Slides serving as positive controls were used in each experiment. A matching immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype antibody was used as a negative control to assess the specificity of the antibody. FSQ and WWY, blinded to the clinicopathological data, independently assessed the expression using 200 × magnification light microscopy. p-β-cateninTyr654 was divided into positive and negative expressions. Stainings of PD-L1 were assessed for tumor proportion score (TPS). PD-L1 expression <50% was considered low, whereas ≥50% was considered high [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!