The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Umax powerlook 1120

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in Sweden

The UMAX PowerLook 1120 is a compact and versatile lab equipment designed for high-performance scanning. It features a 1200 x 1200 dpi optical resolution and supports a wide range of media sizes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using umax powerlook 1120

1

Autophosphorylation Kinetics of DesR Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DesR autophosphorylation reactions were performed with protein concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 500 µM at 25°C and pH 8 and incubation with a mixture of 50 mM acetyl phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM Tris-HCl. The reaction volumes varied between 20 and 100 µl. Addition of acetyl phosphate was immediately followed by warming from 4 to 25°C. Autophosphorylation was stopped at 1 h, the mixture was cooled to 4°C, and SDS-PAGE sample buffer with 2.5 mM DTT was added. Protein samples (0.13 to 1.1 µM) were incubated with SDS-PAGE sample buffer at room temperature for 5 min and mixed with iodoacetamide (40 mM) for 10 min. Phos-tag SDS-PAGE was performed as previously described (57 (link)), with 50 µM Phos-tag acrylamide and 100 µM ZnCl2. Coomassie-stained gels were scanned with UMAX PowerLook 1120 and LabScan 5.0 (GE HealthCare) and analyzed by Image Quant TL v2005 software (GE HealthCare). The peak areas corresponding to phosphorylated (slower migration) and unphosphorylated species were integrated, and the degree of phosphorylation (ξP) was calculated according to the formula ξP = DesR − P peak area × (DesR − P peak area + DesR peak area)−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Differential Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After staining, we scanned gels using a calibrated UMAX PowerLook 1120 scanner running LabScan software (GE Healthcare, www.gehealthcare.com). We used Image MasterTM 2D Platinum 6.0 software (GE Healthcare, www.gehealthcare.com) to analyze the gels. We analyzed differences between corresponding spots in each set of gels (NES2Y exposed to DMSO and p,p‘-DDT 150 μM). We selected spots with an approximately twofold (or bigger) difference in expression between the cell lysate exposed to DMSO and the cell lysate exposed to 150 μM DDT as spots with a different expression. We determined the statistical significance of changes in protein expression using the student´s t-test. Spots with significantly different intensities were cut and sent for MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hypoxia-Induced Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stained gels were digitally imaged using a calibrated UMAX PowerLook 1120 scanner with LabScan software (both GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and analyzed using Image MasterTM 2D Platinum 6.0 software (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Differences between corresponding spots were analyzed in each set of gels (control vs. hypoxia 1 h and hypoxia 4 h) and selected spots with twofold (or higher) average difference in expression between control and any of the hypoxia samples, were cut and sent for mass spectrometry identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After staining, we scanned gels using a calibrated UMAX PowerLook 1120 scanner running LabScan software (both GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). We used Image Master TM 2D Platinum 6.0 software (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) to analyze gels. We analyzed differences between corresponding spots in each set of gels (NES2Y exposed to DMSO and p,p'-DDT 150 μM). We selected spots with an approximately twofold (or bigger) difference in expression between the cell lysate exposed to DMSO and the cell lysate exposed to 150 μM DDT as spots with a different expression. We determined the statistical significance of changes in protein expression using the Student´s t-test. Spots with significantly different intensities were cut and sent for MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!