The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti annexin 2

1

Western Blot Analysis of Aorta and Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates of aorta or macrophages were prepared and then separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE. Briefly, cells were homogenized and lysed with RIPA lysis buffer. 40 μg protein per lane was separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and electroblotted onto a poly (vinylidene difluoride) membrane (GE Healthcare). Following that, non‐specific binding was blocked by incubating with 5% non‐fat milk in TBST buffer at room temperature for 1 hr. The transferred proteins were incubated overnight at 4°C with various primary antibodies in Tris‐buffered saline with Tween buffer (20 mM Tris‐HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20) followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hr. Primary antibodies including anti‐tenascin‐c (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐annexin II (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐Akt (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐p‐Akt (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐p65 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐p‐p65 (1:600; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐ERK1/2 (1:800; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐p‐ERK1/2 (1:800; Santa Cruz Biotech), anti‐HIF‐1α (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech) and anti‐HIF‐2α (1:600; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) were employed. After extensive washes in Tris‐buffered saline with Tween buffer, the signals on the membrane were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of Tenascin-C and Annexin II in Aorta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of tenascin‐c and annexin II protein in mice aorta was analysed by immunohistochemical staining 28. Briefly, arterial sections (5 μm thick) were fixed in 5% formaldehyde before dehydrated with different doses of ethanol. The sections were then adhered to poly‐l‐lysine glass slides, washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS 0.01 M, pH 7.4) and then treated with hydrogen peroxide to inactivate endogenous peroxides. The samples were then blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin and incubated with anti‐tenascin‐c (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA) and anti‐annexin II (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotech) antibody for 12 hrs at 44°C. After washing with PBS for three times, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody for 10 min. at 37°C and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase labelled streptavidin solution. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used for stain, with incubation for 1–2 min. The cover slips were counterstained with haematoxylin and then examined under light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Cytoskeletal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells were grown on round glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific) in 35 mm cell culture dishes. After treatment with 1, 2, 4, or 19 for 4 h, the cells were fixed with pre-chilled methanol for 20 min. The coverslips were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min and then incubated with primary antibody (Texas Red-antiphalloidin, Life Tecnologies; antivimentin, Sigma; antiannexin II – Santa Cruz) for 1 h (see Western Blot Analyses section for discussion of antibodies). After removal, the coverslips were washed three times for 5 min washes with PBS and then incubated with a fluorescently labeled secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 647 antimouse and Alexa Fluor 555 antirabbit, Invitrogen) for another 50 min. After washing with PBS, the coverslips were mounted onto glass slides with anti-fade mounting medium (Invitrogen). Images were captured with a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope by using Slidebook 4.2.0.11 (Intelligent Imaging Innovations).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!