The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using hoechst dna stain

1

Isolation and Labeling of Gastric Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glands were isolated using a protocol adapted from Mahé et al. (29 (link)). Dissected gastric tissue was cut into 1-mm2 pieces and incubated with slight shaking in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) (Millipore) plus 5 mM EDTA at 4°C for 2 h. After this period, the tissue was transferred into ice-cold DPBS containing 1% sucrose and 1.5% sorbitol and shaken roughly by hand for 2 min. The remaining large tissue pieces were allowed to settle, and 2 ml of the solution containing the glands was removed. Glands were then transferred into a clean tube, washed two times with 2 ml DPBS each time, and labeled with 10 µg/ml Hoechst DNA stain (Life Technologies). Glands were kept on ice until examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying H. pylori infection in gastric glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated glands were labeled with 10 μg/ml Hoechst DNA stain (Life Technologies). Ten microliters of labeled glands were placed on glass slides and visualized using a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope with fluorescence filters for 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and GFP. For each time point of infection, 100 glands were imaged for the corpus and 100 for the antrum, and the number of intra-gland H. pylori was manually counted for each gland. Gland occupancy was calculated as the percentage of glands occupied per mouse. Gland load were calculated by averaging the number of bacteria in occupied glands per mouse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies and dilutions used were as follows: Rabbit anti-MOF (gift from Kuroda lab) at 1:100–1:200, Rabbit anti-H4K16ac (#8662 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:100, Mouse anti-HP1 (C1A9 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:200, Mouse anti-EcR (DDA2.7 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:100, Mouse anti-Mtor (#12F10 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:30, Chicken anti-GFP (#1020 from Aves Labs Inc.) at 1:500, Rabbit anti-H3K27me3 (#9733 from Cell Signaling) at 1:100, Rabbit anti-H3K9me3 (ab8898 from Abcam) at 1:100 and Hoechst DNA stain (H3570; ThermoFisher) at 1:1,000. Fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies were as follows: ThermoFisher Alexa Fluor conjugates of goat anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, 488 and 568 at 1:300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Detection of DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on top of poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips. After treatment, coverslips were rinsed 2× with PBS, crosslinked in 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS, washed 3× for 5 min in PBS/0.1% Triton-X. Cells were blocked with PBS/0.1% Triton-X/3% BSA for 30 min at RT. Cells were incubated with primary antibody against phospho-Histone H2A.X (1:100, Millipore Sigma) in blocking solution and washed 3× for 5 min in PBS. Secondary antibody (anti-mouse labeled with Alexa Fluor 488, 1:800 in blocking solution, ab150113, Abcam) was incubated for 1 h at RT. Cells were washed 3× for 5 min in PBS, 15 min in PBS with Hoechst DNA stain (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific), rinsed with PBS and mounted with ProlongGlass (Life Technologies) on top of a glass slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies and dilutions used were as follows: Rabbit anti-MOF (gift from Kuroda lab) at 1:100–1:200, Rabbit anti-H4K16ac (#8662 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:100, Mouse anti-HP1 (C1A9 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:200, Mouse anti-EcR (DDA2.7 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:100, Mouse anti-Mtor (#12F10 from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:30, Chicken anti-GFP (#1020 from Aves Labs Inc.) at 1:500, Rabbit anti-H3K27me3 (#9733 from Cell Signaling) at 1:100, Rabbit anti-H3K9me3 (ab8898 from Abcam) at 1:100 and Hoechst DNA stain (H3570; ThermoFisher) at 1:1,000. Fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies were as follows: ThermoFisher Alexa Fluor conjugates of goat anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, 488 and 568 at 1:300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of HeLa and 3T3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We plated HeLa and 3T3 cells on poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips. Forty-eight hours post-transfection, we rinsed the coverslips twice with PBS and fixed the cells with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After 2 washes with PBS, we permeabilized the cells with PBT (PBS, 0.1% Tween-20) for 15 min at room temperature. Next, we blocked the coverslips with 5% BSA in PBT for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated the coverslips with properly diluted primary antibody (mouse M2 monoclonal ANTI FLAG, 1:800, F1804, Sigma; rabbit polyclonal Tom20, 1:800, FL-145, Santa Cruz) in 5% BSA in PBT for 3 h at 37 °C in a humid chamber. Coverslips were washed three times for 5 min each with PBT and incubated with diluted secondary antibody (anti-mouse labeled with Alexa Fluor 488, 1:800, ab150113, Abcam; anti-rabbit labeled with Alexa Fluor 647, 1:800, 4414S, CST) in 5% BSA in PBT for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice for 5 min with PBS, once for 20 min with PBS containing Hoechst DNA stain (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific), rinsed in PBS, and then mounted on glass slides with ProLong Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria (Lm, Bs, Ec, and Sa) were grown overnight in medium, with shaking, as noted above. The bacteria were diluted to an OD600 of 0.5, and then, 500 μl of each culture was mixed together to create 2 ml of mixed bacteria. One milliliter of Msmeg expressing mCherry was grown from a single colony overnight to an OD600 of 0.5. Both cultures were pelleted by centrifugation (3300g for 3 min) and resuspended in an identical volume of LB medium. Sixty microliters of Msmeg was added to 540 μl of mix. Lastly, this final mixture of bacteria containing Msmeg and the four other non–mycomembrane- bearing bacterial species was split into two 300 μl of aliquots. To each group, 0.3 μl of Hoechst DNA stain (2 mg/ml; 62249, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to stain all the bacteria. To one of the two aliquots, 3 μl of 10 mM DMN-Tre was added, whereas no DMN-Tre was added to the other portion. The two aliquots were incubated with shaking at 37°C for 1 hour before a sample was taken out and imaged without washing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!