The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nl844

Manufactured by Digitimer
Sourced in United Kingdom

The NL844 is a laboratory device manufactured by Digitimer. It serves as a DC-coupled, high-gain, differential voltage amplifier. The core function of the NL844 is to amplify and condition low-level electrical signals for further processing and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using nl844

1

Electrophysiological Recording from Rat Somatosensory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recordings were made with silver ball electrodes (Ø 250 μm). The signal was passed through a Digitimer NL844 pre-amplifier with a low frequency cut off at 0.1 Hz and gain x1000, connected to the NL820 isolator (Neurolog system, Digitimer) with gain x5. The data were digitized at 1 kHz using CED 1401 mk2 hardware and Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design (CED), Cambridge, UK). The recorded data had a sampling time of 1 ms/1 kHz (Figures 1D and 1E). Local field potential responses evoked by the electrical stimulation of the skin of the forepaw verified that the recording electrode was correctly placed in the forepaw area of the S1. The duration of anesthesia did not exceed 8 h. Once all the recordings were performed the animal was euthanized using a lethal dose of pentobarbital.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Pelvic Floor Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants sat reclined on a plinth with knees extended and back rest at approximately 30° from vertical. US was recorded in video format with a transducer (M7C, GE Healthcare, Australia) placed in the mid-sagittal plane on the perineum. A foot switch triggered each US recording and was used to synchronise US with IAP and EMG. A naso-gastric pressure transducer (CTG-2, Gaeltec Ltd, UK) recorded IAP. PR and BC EMG was recorded with intramuscular electrodes fabricated from pairs of fine-wires (Teflon coated, stainless steel wire, diameter– 75μm). With US guidance, an experienced colorectal surgeon inserted the electrodes through the perineum into PR in a cranial direction just left of the anus, and into BC in a ventral direction at the base of the penis. SUS EMG was recorded using a transurethral surface electrode[17 (link)] which was self-inserted by the participant after detailed instruction. One participant requested assistance with catheterisation from a supervising urologist. Pelvic floor muscle EMG was amplified 2000x (NL844, Digitimer Ltd, UK), bandpass filtered between 10–2000 Hz (NL125, Digitimer Ltd, UK) and recorded at 10 KHz with a Power1401 analogue to digital converter and Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Elbow Flexion Force and EMG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were performed on the participant's dominant arm using a custom‐designed transducer. An aluminum device positioned the elbow in 90 degrees of flexion, where the participant was seated in a rigid back chair with the humerus horizontal and the forearm oriented vertically (Figure 1a). The arm was secured firmly into the device with a non‐compliant wrist strap so that a PT4000 200kg S‐Type load cell (PT Ltd., NZ) attached to the posterior side of the device could measure elbow flexion force. From this load cell data, flexion force could be converted to flexion torque based on the distance between the lateral epicondyle and the point of force application at the wrist. Torque data were sampled at 2 kHz via Spike2 (CED Ltd., UK).
Surface EMG was obtained from the biceps brachii and triceps brachii using bipolar 24 mm Ag/AgCl electrodes. Electrodes were aligned in the direction of underlying muscle fibers and had an inter‐electrode distance of 24 mm (Kendall ARBO). Surface EMG signals were differentially amplified 1,000 times (NL844, Digitimer Ltd., UK), bandpass filtered with cut‐off frequencies of 10 and 500 Hz (NL135 and NL144, Digitimer Ltd., UK), and then input into a 16‐bit Power 1,401 data acquisition interface (CED Ltd., UK). Surface EMG was sampled via the same Spike2 arrangement used to collect torque data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quadriceps Torque and Muscle Activation Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quadriceps torque was measured using a calibrated linear strain gauge (MLP 300; Transducer Techniques, Temecula, CA). Force signals were amplified (1000 times) and sampled at 2000 Hz using a 16-bit Micro 1401 mk-II and Spike 2 data collection software (Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd, Cambridgeshire, England) via custom written program scripts. Electromyogram (EMG) recordings were recorded with surface electrodes (Ag-AgCl, 10 mm diameter) placed over the muscle belly of the vastus lateralis (VL) in a bipolar configuration (centre-to-centre distance of 2 cm). EMG signals were amplified (1000 times; Neurolog Systems, Digitimer Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, England), band-pass filtered (50–1000 Hz; NL-844, Digitimer Ltd) and analog to digitally converted at a sampling rate of 2000 Hz using the CED data acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monkey Grasp Force and EMG Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We recorded grasp force in all 11 sessions of monkey B and surface electromyography (EMG) signals in 2 sessions. Grasp force of monkey S (5 sessions) was recorded online, but not stored for later analyses. Force signals were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel (σ = 10 ms, binsize = 2.5σ) to reduce noise. Surface EMG activity was recorded from the ventral and dorsal lower arm using self-adhesive electrodes and the Neurolog amplifier (NL844 and NL820; Digitimer). EMG activity originated primarily from the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle and the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle. Other muscles, including biceps and triceps, were also explored, but lower arm EMG was best in distinguishing the task conditions and therefore selected. EMG signals were band-pass filtered (25–250 Hz, 6th order Butterworth), rectified, smoothed (Gaussian, σ = 10 ms, binsize = 2.5σ), and normalized by dividing it by the activity during the Fixation epoch48 (link). Note that only trial averaged EMG signals were used for all analyses. Due to their high degree of similarity between sessions, we recorded EMG signals only from 2 sessions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intramuscular EMG Electrode Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fine‐wire intramuscular electrodes were inserted at locations according to the Seniam® (Enschede, The Netherlands) guidelines in the most bulging part the muscle belly of MG and for SOL, at 2/3 of the line between the medial condyle of the femur and the medial malleolus. Electrodes were fabricated using Teflon‐coated wires made of stainless steel, 50 μm diameter (California FineWire) with a detection region of 1 mm. One delivery needle (23‐gauge, 32 mm) containing two wires with their detection areas approximately 3–4 mm apart was inserted into each muscle under sterile conditions. The delivery needles were removed leaving the pairs of wires remaining in the muscle. The position of the electrodes was then adjusted by lightly pulling at the wires to obtain an improved signal‐to‐noise ratio during weak, brief contractions. A single Ag–AgCl surface electrode (diameter 10 mm, Tycell Healthcare Group LP, Hampshire, UK) was placed over the lateral condyle of the tibia and used as a reference electrode. All EMG signals were amplified 1000 times and band pass filtered between 50 Hz and 4 kHz (NL844 and NL105, respectively, Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK) before analogue to digital conversion at 20 kHz (Spike2 and Power 1401, Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Surface EMG Muscle Activity Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface EMG (NeuroLog System NL905, Digitimer Ltd, UK) was used to record the muscle activities of the VL, RF, VM, and biceps femoris of the right leg. After skin preparation (i.e. shaving, abrading, and swabbing the skin with antiseptic), two surface electrodes (8 mm recording diameter, Ag/AgCl, H124SG, Kendall, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA) were placed over these muscles according to SENIAM guidelines (Hermens et al., 2000 (link)) using a 2 cm inter-electrode distance. Due to the placement of the ultrasound transducer, electrodes were placed towards the distal end of VL’s mid-belly. A single reference electrode was secured over the fibular head of the left leg. EMG signals were band-pass filtered between 0.01 and 20 kHz and amplified 2000 times (NL844, Digitimer Ltd, UK), before being sampled at 2 kHz using the Spike2 data collection system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pseudomonopolar EMG Electrode Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For electromyographic (EMG) measurements, a pseudomonopolar electrode placement protocol was used where one surface electrode of a pair (Unilect, Ag/AgCl, Unomedical Ltd., Redditch, UK) was placed on the right SOL and the other over a bony surface of the tibia. A ground electrode was placed over the lateral malleolus (Hoffman et al., 2009) . The pseudomonopolar setup allowed MEPs of higher amplitude to be recorded, which in turn also decreased the intensity of the stimulus needed to evoke a detectable MEP. Prior to electrode placement, the skin was shaved, abraded and cleaned with alcohol to reduce resistance below 5 k . EMG signals were amplified (100×), band-pass filtered (10-1000 Hz) and sampled at 5 kHz (Neural Systems NL 900D and NL 844, Digitimer Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK). EMG data and reaction forces from the pedal were collected with a computer via 16-bit AD converter (CED power 1401, Cambridge Electronics Design Limited, UK) and stored for later analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!