The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 6380 microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JSM-6380 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of materials. The JSM-6380 provides a core function of capturing detailed images of samples by scanning them with a focused electron beam.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using jsm 6380 microscope

1

Seed Micromorphology Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The seeds were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and anatomically. The hard seed coat does not require any special preparation prior to SEM due to absence of any trichomes on its surface. The seed colliculae if present are the thickenings of the outer walls of the testa cells. After sputter coating the material with gold-palladium, the SEM observations were made with a JSM–6380 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan) in the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy of Moscow State University. The anatomical cross-sections of seeds were prepared using a rotary microtome Microm HM 355S (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Before sectioning, the seeds were soaked in water:alcohol:glycerin (1:1:1) solution, dehydrated in an ethanol dilution series and embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). The cross-sections were observed using a Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope and photographed with a Nikon DS-Vi1 camera (Nikon Corporation, Japan) at the Department of Higher Plants (Moscow State University).
The list of samples used for the SEM is provided in Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Nanofibrous Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of membranes was detected by employing a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using, JEOL JSM-6380 microscope. An Image J software (Image-Proplus, Media Cybrernetics) was used to determine the particle size and the size distribution of particles and nanofibers. A diffuse reflectance spectrum (DRS) of MOFs was recorded using UV-2550 (Shimadzu, Japan) UV-vis spectrophotometer. The crystallinity and surface area of synthesized MOFS were determined using X-ray diffractometer type Philips PW 1730 (Japan) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. The contact angle of membranes was investigated using a contact angle meter (CA-VP, Kyowa Interface Science Co., Ltd, Japan). The pore radius (rm) of nanofibrous membranes is calculated as follows: where η is the water viscosity (8.9 × 10−4 Pa s), Q is the volume of the permeate pure water per unit time (m3 S−1), ΔP is the operating pressure (0.2 MPa), A is the membrane effective area (m2), l is the thickness of the membrane (m) and ε is the porosity of the membrane which is defined as follows: where W1 is the weight of the wet membrane, W2 is the weight of the dry membrane and dw is the water density (0.998 g cm−3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lyophilized Fiber Microstructure Examination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the lyophilized fiber was examined using a JEOL JSM-6380 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) operated at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Before SEM analysis, the sample was sputter-coated with gold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Graft Union Formation with SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anatomical examination was conducted through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to compare the plant tissues affected by LED treatments during graft union formation. The 1 cm precisely sectioned rootstock/scion samples from different LED treatments were obtained and used for imaging experiments. The transverse section of the graft union was cut through a sharp razor blade to check the tissue affinity among all treatments over time under SEM (Fig. 9). The imaging analyses were performed on the 5th, 8th, and 11th days after grafting (DAG) to evaluate the matrixs' wound healing process. Each treatment was evaluated in three replications to ensure the results.

Illustration of the grafting procedure and preparing samples for examination with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

SEM images were obtained using the JSM-6380 microscope (JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), resolution 3.0 nm (30 kV, Working Distance WD 8 mm, SEI detection modes), accelerating voltage 0.5 to 30 kV, magnification 5× to 300,000×, stage rotation 360°. The JSM-6380 sample chamber can assess a sample of up to 6-inches in diameter. The sample diameter was ⁓ 5 mm; each tissue portion was placed on the metal disc covered by a thin adhesive layer (Fig. 9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!