The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 602 protocols using s 4800

1

Characterization of Nano-Sized Bubbles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of NBAV was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4800, HITACHI, Japan) and the images were captured by software (HITACHI S-4800, PC-SEM). During the NBAV preparation, the lipid dye DiI (5 μM) was dissolved in the lipid solution for better observation. All other procedures remained the same. The obtained NBAV were examined under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus CKX53, Japan), and images were captured (Camera: Olympus CCD DP74).
The characterization of NBAV, such as size distribution, zeta potential, polydispersity index and stability of NBAV, were measured as described below. The diluted NBAV (4.5 ± 1.0×108 bubbles/mL) solutions were kept at 4 ℃, and then the size distribution was analyzed after 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h, respectively, by a NanoPlus-3 zeta/nano particle analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument CORP, USA). Furthermore, 1mL of NBAV stock solution was diluted with a 9 mL mixture of PBS (0.01 M) and fetal bovine serum (10%, FBS, HyClone, USA), and then size was measured after 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 min at 37 ℃. The zeta potential of NBAV was also measured with this analyzer. All the experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Sample and Recycled Papers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample paper and the recycled papers were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM: Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan, operated at 10 kV and 10 µA) , X-ray diffraction (XRD: Rigaku X-ray diffractometer, RINT, Tokyo, Japan, operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu-Kα radiation) , and Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using ATR method on a Nicolet 4700 (Thermo Electron Corporation) . In addition, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were carried out on the sample paper and the recycled papers using a Horiba Model EMAX 7593-H accessory interfaced with a Hitachi S-4800 SEM instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Milled GNPs and Ni/GNPs Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milled GNPs and Ni/GNPs coating are investigated with the types of equipment as the following: Raman Spectroscopy (LabRAM HR 800, HORIBA Jobin Yvon – France) with a 532 nm laser as an excitation source is used to study GNPs structure. The microstructure of GNPs and the coatings are investigated by FESEM (Hitachi S4800, Japan), GNPs thickness is evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) (XE-100 Park Systems). The composition of the coatings is analyzed using SEM energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) (S-4800; Hitachi, Japan). The thickness of the coatings is estimated with a model Axiovert 40MAT from Carl Zeiss, Germany. The microhardness of the coatings is measured by using a microhardness tester (model Indenta Met 1106) from Buehler, USA. BET measurement is carried out on Autosorb-iQ-MP (02142-1) system (USA). Zeta-size analyzation is measured by a Malvern ZS Nano S analyzer. FTIR analysis is performed by a SHIMADZU IR Prestige21 Spectrometer. The XRD patterns of the coatings are recorded by using an ARL EQUINOX 5000 X-ray diffractometer equipped with CuKα radiation. The XRD data are analyzed by the Rietveld method using the GSAS-2 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Conductive Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) images of the conductive hydrogels were obtained using a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800). Before imaging, each hydrogel sample was frozen at 0 °C for 24 h and then freeze-dried (SCIENTZ-10N) at − 20 °C for 24 h. A small amount of freeze-dried hydrogel was placed on a jig or sample holder with conductive adhesive. The samples were subsequently coated with a 5 nm thick Pt layer using metal sputtering (K575X sputter coater, Quorum Emitech, UK) to prevent charging. Infrared spectra of the conductive hydrogels were recorded using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in the range of 400–4000 cm–1, employing the potassium bromide (KBr) tablet method. X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku Ultima(III) analysis was conducted on both GO and rGO samples using an instrument with CuK α radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). The 2θ range was set to 5–60° with a scan speed of 2°/min and a step rate of 0.02 per second. To characterize the chemical composition of GO and rGO-PDA samples, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using a photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microsphere Morphology Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsphere morphology was investigated by SEM (S-4800; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). First, the microspheres were affixed on metallic mount for coating and were coated with platinum using sputter coater (K575K; Emitech Ltd., Ashford, UK). After coating with platinum, the morphology of microspheres was observed at different zoom magnifications by SEM (S-4800; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). SEM images of microspheres after 1 and 28 days in release buffer were also measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multi-Technique Characterization of C60 Self-Assembled Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The materials obtained were characterized by using various techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM, operating at 10 kV, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM, operating at 30 kV, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan), powder X-ray diffraction (operated at 40 kV, Cu-Kα radiation (=0.1541 nm) RINT2000 diffractometer, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), Fourier transform infrared (FT–IR) spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR, Nexus 670, Tokyo, Japan), Raman scattering (NRS-3100 Raman spectrometer, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Thermo Electron Co. Karlsruhe, Germany, a monochromatic Al-Kα radiation of photon energy 15 keV). The electron microscopy samples were prepared on carbon-coated copper grids by dropping C60 self-assembled crystals (the selected ones) suspension in isopropyl alcohol (3 μL) and drying under vacuum at 70 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elemental composition and surface morphologies of the prepared materials were characterized using Hitachi S-4800 with a 15 kV accelerating voltage and a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 with KBr pellets using an AVATAR 360 spectrophotometer (Nicolet, USA). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared materials were observed using a Bruker X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation in the 2θ range from 10° to 80°. N2 adsorption–desorption was employed at 77 K on an ASAP 2020 apparatus for the analysis of specific surface area and pore-size distributions. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Philips CM120, Netherlands) was performed at 200 kV and used to study the morphologies and crystalline characteristics of the prepared materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Structural Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology, composition and structure were investigated by field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, S–4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), mapping (Mapping, S–4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Karlsruhe, Germany). Functional groups of the samples were obtained by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Bruker Vertex 70, Karlsruhe, Germany). Raman spectra were recorded using a Raman spectrometer (RAMAN, iHR550, Shanghai, China) at a wavelength of 532 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Surface Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM;HITA CHI, S-4800, Japan) to detect the surface morphology. The surface roughness was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM; MultiMode 8, Karlsruhe, Germany). The ion concentration in the sample surfaces were determined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; QX200, Brüker) and the distribution of strontium above the surfaces were monitored by EDS mapping. The hydrophilic property of samples was detected by water contact angle measurement which was conducted by the sessile-drop method at ambient temperature on a contact angle meter (SL200B, Solon). The crystal structure of different samples was detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/Max-RB, Rigaku, Japan). The coating thickness was accessed by focused ion beam (FIB; Gatan, Ilion, USA) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S-4800, Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of NiOx Nanoparticle Sensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sizes of NiOx NPs were estimated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan) images. The surface morphology of the sensor electrodes was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park System XE100, Suwon, Korea). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) analysis was conducted to investigate the elemental composition of the electrode. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Billerica, MA, USA) patterns were recorded for phase identification. The resistance was measured using a multimeter (Agilent U1251B, Santa Clara, CA, USA) while the temperature was precisely controlled by a hot plate (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). The temperature of the hot plate also was monitored by a commercial thermocouple (Type K, EA11A). The resistivity (ρ) of the electrode was calculated using the equation: ρ = R·(A/l), where R, A, and l are the resistance, cross-sectional area, and length of the electrode, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!