The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

121 protocols using total starch assay kit

1

Root Metabolite Analysis of Starch and Carotenoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At eight months after planting, samples were collected for metabolite analysis. Thirty grams of root cubes were snap frozen and lyophilized prior to analysis. Lyophilized root samples were analyzed for starch content using a Total Starch Assay kit by Megazyme (Bray, Ireland). The standard protocol, which excludes D-glucose rinsing and measurement of the resistant starch of samples, was followed. Using a glucose standard, absorbance was measured at 510 nm and starch values were calculated using the weight and the absorbance value. Carotenoid content and composition were measured for the same samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-ToF-MS) at the Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Plant Quality and Food Security, Germany. Extraction and analysis of carotenoids and chlorophyll were conducted according to Frede et al. [16] (link) using an Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity II UHPLC (Agilent Technologies Sales and Services GmbH and Co. KG, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to Agilent Technologies 6230 TOF LC/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Feed Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The second subsample of 300 g was air-dried in a cool, ventilated place, and ground using a feed mill (DF-20, Wenling Linda machinery co. LTD, Zhejiang, China) to a particle size of 1 mm for further analyses. Then, samples were analyzed for DM (method 930.15), and ash (method 942.05) using the AOAC method [13 ]. Furthermore, the starch was analyzed using a total starch assay kit (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland; method 996.11) based on the AOAC method [13 ]. The nitrogen was analyzed using the Dumas combustion method (RaPid N III, Langenselbold, Germany). In addition, the CP was calculated using a 6.25 nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor. The ether extract (EE) was obtained using an automatic extractor (ANKOM XT101, ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA). The determination of NDF, ADF, and acid detergent lignin (ADL) was performed according to the method reported by Van Soest et al. [14 (link)] and Robertson et al. [15 (link)] with heat-stable α-amylase, and performed using a fiber analyzer (ANKOM A220, ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA). The water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) was determined by anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetry [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Rice Grain Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RS content was determined using the AOAC official method 2002.02, which has been described by Ren et al. [5] (link). The contents of total starch and amylose/amylopectin were measured with total starch assay kit and amylose/amylopectin assay kit (Megazyme International, Ireland, Ltd), respectively. Other basic components were carried out by following the AOAC protocol (AOAC, 2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Starch and Amylose Analysis in Mutant Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The seeds of 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 DAF of mutant line and wild-type Gao 8901 were used to carry out starch content, amylose content and GBSS I activity analysis. Total starch and amylose contents were measured using the Total Starch Assay Kit and Amylose/Amylopectin Assay Kit (www.megazyme.com) according to manual instructions. GBSS I activity was measured using the Micro Bound Station amylosynthease Assay Kit (http://www.shkxbio.com). All tests were performed on three replicates. Student’s t-test assessed statistical differences between wild type and mutant line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determination of Total Starch in White Bean Paste

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total starch (TS) content was determined using Total Starch Assay Kit (amyloglucosidase/α–amylase method) suitable for food products (Megazyme, Ireland) according to manufacturer’s procedure [24 ], with slight modification–glucose content was determined based on DNS assay [25 (link)] using UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV 1601PC, Shimadzu Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Starch was calculated as glucose × 0.9. Results were expressed in mg per 1 g DW of white bean paste.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Methods for Feed Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dry matter (DM, 135°C for 2 h) and chemical components of the diets and refusals were determined. The ether extract, Kjeldahl N, and crude ash values were determined according to Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2000 ; methods 920.39, 990.03, and 942.05, respectively). The organic matter (OM) was calculated as weight loss during ashing. The NDF was assayed with a heat‐stable amylase and sodium sulfite, and expressed exclusive of residual ash. This and acid detergent fiber (ADF) expressed exclusive of residual ash were analyzed according to the methods of van Soest et al. (1991 (link)) and the AOAC (2000 ; method 973.18). Starch was assayed using a commercial kit (Total Starch Assay Kit; Megazyme Ltd., Wicklow, Ireland). The gross energy was determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (CA‐4PJ; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the rumen fluid were determined using a gas chromatograph (6890; Hewlett‐Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a glass column packed with 5% Thermon 1000 and 0.5% H3PO4 on 80/100 mesh Chromosorb W (Wako Pure Chemical Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Milk samples were analyzed for fat, protein, and lactose concentrations by infrared spectroscopy (Milko‐Scan 133B; N. Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Starch Content in OsSUS3-OE Endosperm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The endosperm at different development of OsSUS3-OE and wild-type plants were used to measure the content of starch. The starch were collected and assayed by total starch assay kit (Megazyme, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Starch Characterization of Rice Flour

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mature rice grains were air-dried and dehulled. Brown rice was further ground with a mortar and passed through a 0.15 mm sieve. The total starch content in the flour was determined with a total starch assay kit (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland). The amylose content was measured by using an iodine-potassium iodide colorimetric method as described previously [42 (link)]. The chain length distribution of amylopectin was analyzed using a fluorophore-assisted capillary electrophoresis (FACE) method according to the previous report [43 (link)]. The thermal properties and pasting properties of starch were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, 200-F3, Netzsch, Selb, Germany) and rapid visco analyzer (RVA, 3D, Newport Scientific, Narrabeen, Australia), respectively, following the method as described previously [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Chemical Characterization of Pasta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical composition was assessed both on raw materials and dry pasta. Moisture was measured by a thermobalance (Sartorius MA 40, Goettingen, Germany) at 120 °C and all analytical data were expressed as dry weight (dw).
Total starch (TS) content was determined according to the Official Method 996.11 [28 ], by Total Starch Assay Kit (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland). Amylose content was determined using the Megazyme Amylose/Amylopectin assay kit. Resistant starch (RS) content was determined according to the Official Method 2002.02 [29 ], using Resistant Starch Assay Kit (Megazyme). Total dietary fiber (TDF) content was measured using the enzymatic kit Bioquant (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the Official Method 991.42 [30 ]. Ash content was determined according to the Official Method 08-01.01 [31 ]. Protein content was determined by micro-Kjeldhal nitrogen analysis, according to the ICC 105-2 method [32 ], using as conversion factor N × 6.25. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was determined according to Martini et al. [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Potato Starch and Wheat Gluten Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shepody potatoes were provided by the Dingbian Science and Technology Bureau of Shaanxi Province, China. Potato starch was isolated from Shepody potatoes containing 4.24% moisture, 95.76% starch, and 1.95% ash. Wheat gluten was purchased from Tian Long Wheat Flour Co., Ltd. (Henan, China). The wheat gluten contained 7.22% moisture, 89.34% protein, 9.82% starch, and 0.82% ash. The production way of the wheat gluten was as follows: Wheat flour was mixed with water and then separated by pumping the flour paste into a series of hydrocyclone. The obtained flow was then washed and sieved to get the wet gluten. After that, a drying process was applied before packing. Moisture, protein, and ash contents were determined using AOAC official methods (Association of Analytical Chemists, 2000), and starch content was determined using a total starch assay kit (Megazyme, K‐TSTA 04/2009). All these measurements were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!