The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

85 protocols using dma 80

1

Mercury Content Analysis in Snail Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the snail samples, the determination of Hg content was carried out with a direct mercury analyser (DMA-80, Milestone S.r.l., Sorisole, Italy).
The DMA-80 analysis was performed in accordance with EPA method 7473 [15 ]. Precisely, ~100 mg of every sample was initially dried at 250 °C for 3 min and then thermally decomposed at 650 °C for 3 min. Subsequently, having previously constructed a seven-point calibration curve, it was possible to determine the Hg content by working at its typical wavelength, i.e., 253.7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Micronutrient Analysis of Plant Biomass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micronutrient analysis was requested from Chungnam National University’s Agricultural Science Research Institute, and the analysis was conducted according to the following method. The mineral contents of Na, K, Zn, Mn, Fe, and Mg were analyzed by preparing a sample using the dry painting method. Samples of 2–5 g of PBM were placed in a self-made crucible, preliminarily preheated on a hot plate, incubated at 600°C for 2 h, and then cooled. Next, quantitative filter No. 6 (Advantec Co., Tokyo, Japan) was filtered using hot water, filtered to 100 ml, and analyzed using ICP-OES (iCAP 7400, THERMO). All reagents and distilled water were used for the mineral analysis.
For analysis As and Cd of samples, put a certain amount of sample into the microwave (QWAVE 2000, Questron technologies corp.), decompose with 70% nitric acid, give a quantification to 100 ml, and use ICP-OES (iCAP 7400, THERMO) analysis was carried out. All reagents and distilled water were used for purpose of mineral analysis. Mercury (Hg) was analyzed using a Mercury analyzer (DMA-80 Milestone) and calculated using a calibration curve obtained as a standard solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Trace Element Analysis of Pita Bread

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of trace elements (As, Co, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Ni) in pita samples was performed using an Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS, Stafford House, UK) Zeeman Graphite Furnace GF95Z Thermo Electron corporation M series. Each pita sample was digested in triplicate and each digested sample was analyzed in triplicate. Mercury was analyzed by direct mercury analyzer DMA 80 Milestone (Sorisole, Italy) using 0.2 g of pita sample.
To guarantee the method reliability, a certified reference material (CRM; BCR-191) underwent the same digestion protocol and was analyzed at the same time as the pita samples. The recovery percentages obtained for the reference material were 93.2% for Hg, 110.8% for Pb, 86.3% for Ni, and 110.1% for Cd. For the other elements, As, Co, and Cr, for which reference materials were not available, bread samples were spiked by a known concentration (0.1 mg/L) of each of the above listed elements before digestion. The spiked bread was treated and digested in the same way as the bread samples and analyzed using an AAS. The recovery percentages were 103.08% for As, 101.29% for Co, and 96.37% for Cr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mercury Analysis in Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (100 mg) were analyzed for Hg concentration using an DMA-80 (Milestone, Shelton, CT, USA) by thermal decomposition (from 60 to 650 °C for about 5–6 min), in oxygen or air atmosphere according to US EPA 7473 method [28 (link)].
Prior to the analysis, the calibration curve was constructed using Hg 1000 mg/L certified standard (CZECH Metrology Institute Analytika). The calibration standard solutions were prepared in glass flasks at 5 concentration points, in the range between 0.05 and 10 mg/L. Each standard solution was injected six times. The method was validated according to the EURACHEM guidelines (EURACHEM 2014). The evaluation of the linearity was based on the determination of the coefficient of determination (r2). Good linearity was observed, achieving a r2 = 0.9996. The detection limit (LOD) and quantification limit (LOQ) were counted as 3 times and 6 times the standard deviation for blanks and were 0.29 µg/kg and 0.58 µg/kg, respectively. For seawater matrix LOD and LOQ were 0.05 and 0.16 µg/L respectively. The accuracy of the Hg analysis was tested using spearfish sample (TB 149) and coastal seawater (IRMM BCR-579) certified reference material (CRM). Recoveries were 93% and 95%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Total Mercury Analysis in Muscle Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried samples of bulk muscle tissues were analyzed for total Hg using a direct Hg analyzer (DMA-80, Milestone Inc., Monroe, CT). Quality assurance consisted of the analysis of certified reference materials (DORM-4: fish protein, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada) and duplicate samples. The recovery of total Hg from DORM-4 was 96 % (n=2) and the RPD between duplicate samples was 0.80 % (n=2). In order to compare Hg concentrations to published values, wet weight concentrations in YR muscle samples were estimated by assuming a moisture content of 80%, which is consistent with a previous study with YR (Barst et al. 2015) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mercury Analysis via Thermal Decomposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
6 Total Hg measurements were carried out using a direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80, Milestone Inc., Monroe, CT), which uses thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Method 7473 (US EPA, 2007) . Quality assurance consisted of analysis of certified reference materials MESS-3 (marine sediments; n=7) and DOLT-4 (dogfish liver; n=6), National Research Council of Canada, NRCC, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada). Mean percent recovery of total Hg from MESS-3 was 97 ± 1.4 % and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 1.5 %. Mean percent recovery of total Hg from DOLT-4 was 98 ± 3.8 % and the RSD was 3.9 %. Mass balances for Cd, Pb, As, Hg, and Se are reported in the Supplementary Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determination of Hg Species by CAAS and LC-ICPMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Hgtot concentration was determined by combustion atomic absorption
spectrometry (CAAS) using a direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80, Milestone,
RSD = 6%). The concentration of Hg(Cys)2 was determined
by LC-ICPMS (RSD = 10%).29 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Hg in Hg-FeS Solids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total Hg contents in the Hg-FeSads - and Hg-FeSppc solids were determined by direct thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrometry (Milestone DMA-80). A Fe2O3/ZnO mixture (~0.1 g per 0.05 g of Hg-FeS sample) was added to the solid prior to analysis to help quench sulfide volatilization and to prevent poisoning of the catalyst and amalgamator during decomposition of the FeS. Instrument calibrations were verified by analysis of a soil standard reference material (SRM:2709A San Joaquin sediment). The average measured value of the SRM was 0.9±0.1 mg/kg Hg (n=68), consistent with the certified value of 0.9±0.2 mg/kg Hg. Mass distribution of Hg on a Hg-FeSppc sample was assessed by synchrotron micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (see SI for details).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Total Mercury in Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total mercury concentrations in blood were analyzed by the gold amalgamation method using a direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80; Milestone Inc., Shelton, CT, USA). For the accuracy of analysis, the mercury standard solution was made stepwise by 1 to 10 mL according to the required concentrations using a 1000 mg/L standard solution (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). The mercury standard solution was diluted with a 0.001% L-cysteine solution to make 100 mL solution, which was then used for preparing the calibration curves and measuring the absorbance of mercury. A 100 μl of sample from each participant was injected into the sample container of the analyzer. The absorbance of samples was measured at 253.7 nm wavelength, and the concentration of mercury in these samples (mg/mL) was determined using a calibration curve [21 ]. For the quality control of the laboratory, we participated in German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS) of the Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen for occupational-medical and environmental medical toxicological analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Direct Mercury Analysis in Salt Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For salt samples, a determination of Hg content was also carried out with a direct mercury analyzer (DMA-80, Milestone S.r.l., Sorisole, Italy), an instrument based on the thermal decomposition amalgamation-atomic absorption spectrophotometry (TDA-AAS). The DMA-80 is a more versatile analytical instrumentation compared to ICP-MS: it permits the direct analysis of the sample without the need for pre-treatment and it is a more environmentally friendly analytical method than ICP-MS due to the use of a minimal amount of reagent for instrument cleaning and the safety of operators who are not exposed to mercury. The guidance reported by the EPA Method 7473 (SW-846) [18 ] was referred to in developing the method of analysis of DMA-80. Precisely, ~100 mg of every homogenized sample was initially dried at 230 °C for 3 min and then thermally decomposed at 650 °C for 3 min. The Hg content was determined by working at its typical wavelength, i.e., 253.7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!